AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

CORE STATE Navi 22
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2581 MHz
TDP 165 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
AMD
RADEON

Radeon RX 7600M

CORE STATE Navi 33
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2410 MHz
TDP 90 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,257
N/A
geekbench_metal
128,981
N/A
geekbench_opencl
85,040
63,775
geekbench_vulkan
99,483
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M

AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT and AMD Radeon RX 7600M are two very different mobile GPUs, separated by a full generation of architecture but also by their positioning within AMD’s lineup. The 6850M XT is an end-of-life flagship from the Radeon RX 6000 series, built for maximum performance, while the 7600M is an active, mainstream part from the RX 7000 series. Benchmark data confirms the 6850M XT is substantially faster, but the 7600M brings a more modern foundation to the table. The core question is whether you need raw power or the efficiency and architectural updates of a newer design.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is the clear performance winner in the one benchmark where both GPUs were tested against each other. In Geekbench OpenCL, the 6850M XT scores 85,040 points, which is 33.3% higher than the RX 7600M's 63,775 points. This is a decisive victory for the older, larger chip. The 6850M XT also has a higher overall average benchmark score of 78,940 across all recorded tests, compared to 63,775 for the 7600M, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs versus the 89th percentile for the 7600M. If you are prioritizing compute performance in OpenCL workloads, the 6850M XT is the only logical choice.

The RX 7600M does not win any head-to-head benchmark comparisons in the data. Its advantage lies not in benchmark scores but in its design parameters. As a newer part, it is built on a more advanced 6 nm process node compared to the 7 nm node of the 6850M XT, and it consumes significantly less power, with a 90 W TDP versus 165 W. This makes it a better fit for thinner, lighter laptops where thermals and battery life are more critical than absolute performance. The data shows the 7600M wins on efficiency and modern manufacturing, but the 6850M XT wins on every measured performance metric.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is a generational one. The RX 6850M XT is based on the Navi 22 chip using the RDNA 2.0 architecture, while the RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip with the newer RDNA 3.0 architecture. The 6850M XT is a larger die at 335 mm², packing 17,200 million transistors, whereas the 7600M has a smaller 204 mm² die with 13,300 million transistors. The newer 6 nm process of the 7600M allows for a higher transistor density of 65.2M per mm² compared to 51.3M per mm² on the 7 nm 6850M XT.

In terms of raw compute resources, the 6850M XT has more of everything that matters for throughput. It features 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 40 ray tracing cores. The 7600M is cut down to 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Both have the same number of raster operations units at 64. Despite having fewer physical cores, the 7600M achieves a higher theoretical FP32 performance of 17.27 TFLOPS, versus 13.21 TFLOPS for the 6850M XT, due to the architectural efficiency of RDNA 3.0. Memory configurations also differ, with the 6850M XT using 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, while the 7600M has 8 GB on a 128-bit bus.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct head-to-head benchmark available is Geekbench OpenCL, and it is not close. The RX 6850M XT scores 85,040, while the RX 7600M scores 63,775. This gives the 6850M XT a 33.3% advantage, a significant margin that will translate into visibly better performance in OpenCL-accelerated applications like certain productivity suites and compute tasks. The 6850M XT also has a much higher average benchmark score of 78,940 across all tests, compared to 63,775 for the 7600M, confirming that this lead is not isolated to a single test.

The 6850M XT also dominates in synthetic memory and rasterization throughput, which are not directly compared but are reflected in its specification sheet. It offers 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth versus 256.0 GB/s for the 7600M, and a texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s versus 269.9 GTexel/s. While the 7600M has a higher FP32 compute figure, the 6850M XT's larger memory subsystem and higher texture throughput give it the edge in real-world gaming scenarios that are often bandwidth-bound. The data clearly points to the 6850M XT being the faster GPU for any workload that is measured here.

The Verdict

The choice between these two is straightforward if you follow the benchmark data. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is the superior performer, with a 33.3% lead in the only direct head-to-head benchmark and a higher average score across all tests. Its 12 GB memory buffer and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth make it better suited for high-resolution gaming and memory-intensive tasks. The 92nd percentile ranking versus the 89th for the 7600M reinforces that it is a higher-tier part overall. If you need maximum frame rates and compute performance, the 6850M XT is the one to pick, assuming you can handle its 165 W TDP.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is for a different user. It does not win any benchmark comparisons, but it is a newer, active product built on a 6 nm process, which makes it significantly more power-efficient at 90 W. It also has a higher FP32 throughput of 17.27 TFLOPS, which suggests it may be more efficient per watt in certain compute workloads. If you prioritize battery life, lower thermals, and a more modern architecture, the 7600M is the sensible choice, but you must accept a substantial performance penalty. Strictly from the data, the 6850M XT is the faster GPU, and the 7600M is the more efficient one.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT has a significantly higher average benchmark score of 78,940, compared to 63,775 for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M.

Q: How big is the performance difference in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RX 6850M XT scores 85,040, which is 33.3% higher than the RX 7600M's score of 63,775.

Q: Which GPU is more power-efficient?

A: The RX 7600M has a lower TDP of 90 W, while the RX 6850M XT has a TDP of 165 W, making the 7600M more power-efficient.

Q: Does the RX 7600M have more memory?

A: No, the RX 6850M XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Which GPU has a higher theoretical FP32 compute performance?

A: The RX 7600M has a higher FP32 performance of 17.27 TFLOPS, compared to 13.21 TFLOPS for the RX 6850M XT.

Q: Are both GPUs based on the same architecture?

A: No, the RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, while the RX 7600M uses the newer RDNA 3.0 architecture.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | AMD Radeon RX 7600M |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |

| Chip | Navi 22 | Navi 33 |

| Die Size | 335 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Transistors | 17,200 million | 13,300 million |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 1792 |

| TMUs | 160 | 112 |

| RT Cores | 40 | 28 |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |

| Base Clock | 2321 MHz | 1500 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz | 2410 MHz |

| FP32 Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 17.27 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 165 W | 90 W |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2022-01-03 | 2023-01-03 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6850M XT
RX 7600M
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
1,792 -30.0%
Shaders
2,560
1,792 -30.0%
TMUs
160
112 -30.0%
ROPs
64
64 0.0%
Compute Units
40
28 -30.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
2321 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2581 MHz
2410 MHz
Game Clock
2463 MHz
2070 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
8,192 -33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
432.0 GB/s
256.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
3 MB
2 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
165.2 GPixel/s
154.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
413.0 GTexel/s
269.9 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
13.21 TFLOPS
17.27 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
825.9 GFLOPS (1:16)
539.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
26.43 TFLOPS (2:1)
34.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
40
28 -30.0%
Power
TDP
165 W
90 W
TDP (W)
165
90 -45.5%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.0
GPU Name
Navi 22
Navi 33
Codename
—
Hotpink Bonefish
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)
Navi Mobile (RX 7000M)
Process Size
7 nm
6 nm
Transistors
17,200 million
13,300 million
Die Size
335 mm²
204 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.3M / mm²
65.2M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
2.2
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
Polaris Mobile
View Radeon RX 6850M XT Details View Radeon RX 7600M Details