GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6800M

CORE STATE Navi 22

VRAM 12 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2390 MHz

TDP 145 W

BUS WIDTH 192 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 7 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

Intel

GPU

Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

2,238

N/A

geekbench_metal

113,721

N/A

geekbench_opencl

87,621

30,607

geekbench_vulkan

94,766

28,964

passmark_directx_10

101

passmark_directx_11

127

passmark_directx_12

passmark_directx_9

147

passmark_g2d

538

625

passmark_g3d

13,261

5,433

passmark_gpu_compute

5,032

2,157

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6800M vs Intel Arc A310

Visual performance benchmarks between AMD's RX 6800 graphics and the Intel Arc A310 reveal a clear winner. AMD's RX 6800 graphics provides substantially stronger FPS throughout contemporary games. The graphics memory benefit and technical upgrades lead into visibly improved rendering experiences. Score results demonstrates this assessment. Users seeking premium visuals will consider this.

This VRAM edge of AMD's RX 6800 graphics gets particularly significant at increased resolutions. 4K workloads demands significant graphics memory, and AMD's RX 6800 graphics has extra capability. The converts into smoother gameplay in demanding workloads. Modern games should progressively require extra video memory. The advantage expands over time.

All things considered, AMD's RX 6800 graphics delivers the more capable choice in this evaluation. The performance leads warrant attention for buyers building a demanding visual rig. While the Intel Arc A310 offers its merits, this test figures obviously supports AMD's RX 6800 graphics. Base your conclusion based on this. This performance margin is significant enough to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 6800M

A310

Core Specs

Shading Units

2,560

768 -70.0%

Shaders

2,560

768 -70.0%

TMUs

160

32 -80.0%

ROPs

16 -75.0%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2116 MHz

1750 MHz

Boost Clock

2390 MHz

1750 MHz

Game Clock

2300 MHz

—

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

12 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

12,288

4,096 -66.7%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

192 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

384.0 GB/s

124.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

3 MB

4 MB

L3 Cache

96 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

153.0 GPixel/s

28.00 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

382.4 GTexel/s

56.00 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

12.24 TFLOPS

2.688 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

764.8 GFLOPS (1:16)

672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

24.47 TFLOPS (2:1)

5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

6 -85.0%

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

145 W

30 W

TDP (W)

145

30 -79.3%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 22

DG2-128

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)

Alchemist (Arc 3)

Process Size

7 nm

6 nm

Transistors

17,200 million

7,200 million

Die Size

335 mm²

157 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

51.3M / mm²

45.9M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Single-slot

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Xe Graphics

Successor

—

Battlemage

View Radeon RX 6800M Details View Arc A310 Details