AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear hierarchy between these two GPUs, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER winning 9 out of 10 recorded head-to-head tests. The only exception is Geekbench Vulkan, where the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT takes the win by 45.3%, scoring 98,089 versus 53,683. This single victory is notable because it shows the AMD card can outperform the NVIDIA card in specific API workloads, but it remains an outlier in an otherwise dominant NVIDIA showing.

The most lopsided result comes from Geekbench OpenCL, where the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER posts a score of 199,267 against the RX 6750 XT's 16,360, a delta of 1,118%. This is not a close contest by any measure; the NVIDIA card delivers more than twelve times the compute throughput in this particular test. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 5,569 versus 2,548, a 118.6% advantage. This is a strong indicator for modern DirectX 12 gaming workloads, as the test stresses current-generation rendering techniques.

In Passmark G3D, the overall graphics score, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reaches 31,811 while the RX 6750 XT manages 20,700, putting NVIDIA 53.7% ahead. The gap narrows somewhat in older DirectX tests but remains substantial: DirectX 10 shows 181 versus 125 (44.8% delta), DirectX 11 shows 278 versus 180 (54.4% delta), and DirectX 9 shows 360 versus 263 (36.9% delta). DirectX 12 in Passmark also favors NVIDIA, with 119 versus 80, a 48.8% difference.

Compute performance tells a similar story. Passmark GPU Compute gives the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 18,372 versus 9,550, a 92.4% advantage. Even the 2D graphics test, which is less about raw rendering power and more about desktop composition and memory bandwidth, goes to NVIDIA: 1,225 versus 972, a 26% delta. The average benchmark score across all tests reinforces the hierarchy: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER averages 31,087, while the RX 6750 XT averages 26,011. The percentile rankings also separate them, with NVIDIA sitting at the 76th percentile of all GPUs and AMD at the 71st.

When placed among their nearest rivals, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits within 0.4% to 1.9% of cards like the NVIDIA Quadro M5000, GRID M60-1Q, RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, and TITAN RTX. The RX 6750 XT, by contrast, sits within 0.5% to 1.1% of the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, FirePro W7100, FirePro D700, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. This shows that while both cards are competitive within their own performance tiers, the tiers themselves are far apart.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is significant. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT uses the Navi 22 chip on RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, with a density of 51.3 million per square millimeter. The process advantage is clear: NVIDIA fits nearly three times the transistors into a slightly larger die.

The compute resources differ dramatically. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8,448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. It also includes 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores. The RX 6750 XT has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 40 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. This means the NVIDIA card carries 3.3 times the shading units and 1.65 times the TMUs, which directly translates into higher fill rates: 250.6 GPixel/s versus 166.4 GPixel/s, and 689.0 GTexel/s versus 416.0 GTexel/s.

The FP32 compute rating is 44.10 TFLOPS for NVIDIA versus 13.31 TFLOPS for AMD, a ratio of about 3.3 to 1. Interestingly, the FP16 ratings diverge in direction: NVIDIA offers FP16 at the same 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while AMD offers 26.62 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. This means the NVIDIA card does not gain a throughput advantage in FP16, while the AMD card doubles its throughput, but even at double rate, AMD's FP16 is still below NVIDIA's FP32.

The memory subsystems also differ fundamentally. NVIDIA uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. AMD uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card has both more capacity and higher bandwidth. Clock speeds are closer than the compute resources would suggest: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER runs at 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost, while the RX 6750 XT runs at 2150 MHz base and 2600 MHz boost, with a game clock of 2495 MHz. The memory clock differs, with NVIDIA at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) and AMD at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins almost everywhere in the recorded benchmarks. Its strengths lie in compute-heavy workloads, as shown by the massive Geekbench OpenCL lead and the 92.4% advantage in Passmark GPU Compute. It also dominates modern DirectX 12 rendering, with the 118.6% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad and a 48.8% lead in Passmark DirectX 12. For legacy DirectX 9, 10, and 11 titles, it maintains leads between 36.9% and 54.4%. The 2D test also favors NVIDIA, which suggests better desktop composition and memory bandwidth utilization.

The RX 6750 XT wins exactly one test: Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 98,089 against 53,683. This is a 45.3% advantage and indicates that the AMD architecture handles Vulkan API workloads more efficiently in this benchmark. For users running Vulkan-based games or applications, this could translate into real performance, but the data does not show similar wins in other API tests. The RX 6750 XT also has a lower power draw at 250 W versus 285 W, and a dual-slot cooler versus the triple-slot design of the NVIDIA card, which may matter for compact builds.

The use-case split is therefore straightforward. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the choice for DirectX 12 gaming, compute tasks, and overall graphics throughput. The RX 6750 XT is the choice for Vulkan-specific workloads, and it also offers a smaller physical footprint and lower power consumption, which could make it easier to install in tighter cases or with smaller power supplies. The suggested PSU is 600 W for both cards, so that is not a differentiator.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification category. The process node is 5 nm for NVIDIA versus 7 nm for AMD. The transistor count is 45,900 million versus 17,200 million. The die size is 379 mm² versus 335 mm². Transistor density is 121.1M per mm² versus 51.3M per mm². The NVIDIA card uses the Ada Lovelace architecture, while AMD uses RDNA 2.0.

Memory capacity is 16 GB versus 12 GB, with GDDR6X versus GDDR6 and a 256-bit versus 192-bit bus. Bandwidth is 672.3 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2340 MHz versus 2150 MHz, and the boost clock is 2610 MHz versus 2600 MHz, nearly identical. The AMD card has a game clock of 2495 MHz, while the NVIDIA card has no game clock listed. Memory clock is 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Shading units are 8,448 versus 2,560, TMUs are 264 versus 160, and ROPs are 96 versus 64. Ray tracing cores are 66 versus 40. Tensor cores are 264 on NVIDIA, with none on AMD. Pixel rate is 250.6 GPixel/s versus 166.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 689.0 GTexel/s versus 416.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 44.10 TFLOPS versus 13.31 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 44.10 TFLOPS versus 26.62 TFLOPS.

Power draw is 285 W versus 250 W. The NVIDIA card is triple-slot with a single 16-pin connector, while AMD is dual-slot with a 6-pin plus 8-pin configuration. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16 and have identical display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions differ: NVIDIA is 310 mm long, 140 mm tall, and 61 mm wide, while AMD is 267 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. Release dates also differ, with NVIDIA launching on 2024-01-23 and AMD on 2022-03-02. Both are end-of-life products.

FAQ

Q: Which card wins in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins with a score of 5,569 versus 2,548, a 118.6% advantage.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the RX 6750 XT beats the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER?

A: Yes, in Geekbench Vulkan, the RX 6750 XT scores 98,089 versus 53,683, a 45.3% lead for AMD.

Q: How do the memory capacities compare?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each card?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER averages 31,087, while the RX 6750 XT averages 26,011.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8,448 shading units, while the RX 6750 XT has 2,560.

Q: Do both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the faster card in nearly every recorded benchmark. It wins 9 of 10 head-to-head tests, with leads ranging from 26% in Passmark G2D to 1,118% in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score of 31,087 places it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 6750 XT's 26,011 places it in the 71st. The NVIDIA card offers more memory, higher bandwidth, more compute units, and better DirectX 12 performance. It is the pick for anyone prioritizing raw performance, modern gaming, or compute workloads.

The RX 6750 XT is not without merit. Its Vulkan win shows a specific API advantage, and its lower power draw of 250 W versus 285 W, along with a more compact dual-slot design, makes it easier to fit into smaller builds. For users who primarily run Vulkan-based applications or who have space and cooling constraints, the RX 6750 XT is a reasonable choice. However, the benchmark results indicate that for the vast majority of workloads, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers substantially more performance. The choice comes down to whether the user needs the raw throughput of the NVIDIA card or the specific Vulkan efficiency and smaller footprint of the AMD card. The recorded data favors NVIDIA for general-purpose and gaming use, with AMD winning only in a single specialized test.