AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700M records an average benchmark score of 25,633, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 averages 21,629. The AMD part sits at the 71st percentile among all GPUs, versus the NVIDIA card at the 67th percentile.

Q: How do the two compare in DirectX 12 performance?

A: The Radeon RX 6700M wins the PassMark DirectX 12 test with a score of 65, while the Quadro RTX 5000 scores 59. That is a 10.2% advantage for the AMD card, its only head-to-head benchmark win.

Q: What is the largest margin of victory in any shared benchmark?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 wins the PassMark G2D test by 21.7%, scoring 709 versus 555 for the Radeon. It also leads by 20.5% in PassMark DirectX 9 (195 vs 155) and by 20.4% in PassMark GPU Compute (6,525 vs 5,191).

Q: Which GPU has more memory and a wider bus?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon RX 6700M has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are both cards using the same manufacturing process?

A: No. The Radeon RX 6700M is built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The Quadro RTX 5000 uses TSMC's 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a larger 545 mm² die.

Q: Which card has the higher boost clock?

A: The Radeon RX 6700M boosts to 2400 MHz, while the Quadro RTX 5000 boosts to 1815 MHz. However, the Quadro has a higher base clock at 1620 MHz versus 1489 MHz for the AMD part.

The Verdict

The data separates these two cards clearly by workload. The AMD Radeon RX 6700M wins only one of nine shared benchmarks, but that win is in DirectX 12, which points to modern gaming and forward-looking APIs. Its average score of 25,633 places it above the Quadro RTX 5000 by roughly 18.5% based on the recorded averages, and it sits at a higher percentile ranking (71 vs 67). For gamers or users prioritizing current DirectX 12 titles, the Radeon is the better pick.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 dominates the rest of the field. It wins eight of nine head-to-head tests, including all PassMark DirectX 9, DirectX 10, DirectX 11, G2D, G3D, and GPU Compute tests. It also edges out the Radeon in both Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan. With 16 GB of memory, 384 tensor cores, and a dual-slot desktop form factor, this card targets professional workstations, compute tasks, and legacy API compatibility. If the workload involves older DirectX titles, 2D-heavy applications, or compute, the Quadro is the clear choice.

For a mobile gaming laptop, the Radeon RX 6700M makes sense due to its 135 W TDP and integrated form factor. For a desktop workstation requiring maximum memory capacity and broad API support, the Quadro RTX 5000, with its 230 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU, is the more capable tool. The verdict hinges on use case: modern gaming favors AMD, while professional and legacy workloads favor NVIDIA.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Quadro RTX 5000 wins the majority of shared tests, but the margins vary widely. In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA card scores 78,999 versus 77,666 for the Radeon, a slim 1.7% lead. In Geekbench Vulkan, the Quadro scores 92,309 against 90,816, another close 1.6% margin. These near-ties suggest both cards handle compute and modern graphics APIs at similar levels.

The PassMark suite reveals a different story. The Quadro wins DirectX 10 by 18.6% (113 vs 92), DirectX 11 by 7.9% (140 vs 129), and DirectX 9 by 20.5% (195 vs 155). The 2D test shows the largest gap: 709 for the Quadro versus 555 for the Radeon, a 21.7% difference. In GPU Compute, the Quadro leads with 6,525 versus 5,191, a 20.4% margin. The G3D result also favors NVIDIA: 15,616 versus 13,536, which is a 13.3% difference.

The Radeon's only win comes in PassMark DirectX 12, where it scores 65 against 59, a 10.2% advantage. This single win is notable because DirectX 12 is the modern standard for current gaming and is the most forward-looking API in the shared test set. The overall record is 8 wins for NVIDIA and 1 for AMD, but the AMD victory occurs in the test most relevant to new game titles.

Specification Differences

The two cards diverge significantly in memory configuration. The Radeon RX 6700M offers 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Quadro RTX 5000 doubles the capacity to 16 GB, uses a 256-bit bus, and reaches 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. This gives NVIDIA a clear advantage in memory-heavy tasks like large datasets or high-resolution textures.

Clock speeds differ in both directions. The Radeon has a higher boost clock at 2400 MHz and a game clock of 2300 MHz, while the Quadro boosts to only 1815 MHz. However, the Quadro has a higher base clock at 1620 MHz versus 1489 MHz for the Radeon. The memory clock also differs: the Radeon runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), while the Quadro runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The compute resources are distinct. The Radeon packs 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 36 ray tracing cores. The Quadro has 3,072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 384 tensor cores. The FP32 throughput is nearly identical: 11.06 TFLOPS for the Radeon and 11.15 TFLOPS for the Quadro. FP16 is also close at 22.12 TFLOPS versus 22.30 TFLOPS.

Form factor and power differ substantially. The Radeon is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors and a 135 W TDP. The Quadro is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height, requiring one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, with a 230 W TDP and a 550 W suggested PSU. The bus interface also differs: PCIe 4.0 x16 for the Radeon versus PCIe 3.0 x16 for the Quadro.

Architecture Differences

The Radeon RX 6700M uses AMD's RDNA 2.0 architecture on the Navi 22 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. The die measures 335 mm² and contains 17,200 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 51.3 million per mm². The Quadro RTX 5000 uses NVIDIA's Turing architecture on the TU104 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process. Its die is larger at 545 mm² but contains fewer transistors at 13,600 million, resulting in a lower density of 25.0 million per mm².

The Radeon belongs to the Radeon RX 6000 series and the Navi Mobile (RX 6000M) generation, with a predecessor of Polaris Mobile and a release date of May 30, 2021. The Quadro belongs to the GeForce 50-series and the Quadro Turing (Tx000) generation, with a predecessor of Quadro Volta and a successor of Workstation Ampere. The Quadro launched earlier, on August 12, 2018, and carries a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD.

The Radeon has 36 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, while the Quadro has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. This tensor core count gives NVIDIA a significant advantage in AI and deep learning workloads that use TensorFlow or similar frameworks. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so the API feature set is identical. The Radeon's 7 nm process enables higher transistor density and lower power consumption at 135 W, while the Quadro's older 12 nm process requires 230 W for similar FP32 throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon RX 6700M wins in modern gaming scenarios. Its DirectX 12 victory in the head-to-head tests, combined with a higher boost clock of 2400 MHz and a game clock of 2300 MHz, points to strong performance in current titles that leverage DX12 features. The 7 nm process and lower 135 W TDP make it suitable for thin-and-light gaming laptops where power efficiency matters. Its average score of 25,633 and 71st percentile ranking suggest it sits comfortably above the Quadro in overall benchmark averages, making it the better choice for users who prioritize performance in newer APIs.

The Quadro RTX 5000 wins in professional and legacy workloads. It leads in every PassMark test except DirectX 12, including large margins in G2D (21.7%), DirectX 9 (20.5%), GPU Compute (20.4%), and DirectX 10 (18.6%). The 16 GB memory capacity and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth support large datasets and multi-monitor professional setups. The 384 tensor cores enable AI acceleration that the Radeon lacks entirely. Its dual-slot desktop form factor with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors fits workstation builds, and the 550 W suggested PSU indicates it pairs with high-end desktop systems.

For users who need broad API compatibility, the Quadro is the safer pick: it wins DirectX 9, 10, and 11, plus OpenCL and Vulkan. For users who only care about DirectX 12 performance and portability, the Radeon is the better option. The data shows a clear split: AMD for modern gaming, NVIDIA for professional compute and legacy support.