GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

CORE STATE Navi 23

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2416 MHz

TDP 120 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 7 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

GPU

Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

65,800

30,607

geekbench_vulkan

77,735

28,964

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

N/A

625

passmark_g3d

N/A

5,433

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

2,157

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6650M vs Intel Arc A310

Visual performance benchmarks between the AMD RX 6650 and Intel's Arc A310 show a clear winner. the AMD RX 6650 achieves significantly better FPS over current games. The video memory edge and technical upgrades translate into clearly enhanced visual experiences. Performance numbers demonstrates this observation. Enthusiasts looking for high-end visuals would factor this in.

The memory advantage of the AMD RX 6650 grows particularly critical at elevated settings. Demanding scenarios needs substantial graphics memory, and the AMD RX 6650 delivers greater capability. The results into better performance in heavy scenarios. Next-gen software can only demand greater video memory. This edge widens over generations.

The graphics memory edge of the AMD RX 6650 becomes particularly critical at increased resolutions. High resolution workloads demands considerable memory, and the AMD RX 6650 provides greater capability. This translates into smoother performance in VRAM-hungry workloads. Future software will only demand more graphics memory. The benefit widens over generations.

To summarize, the AMD RX 6650 provides the stronger choice in this evaluation. Its benchmark superiority support examination for buyers assembling a high-performance gaming PC. While Intel's Arc A310 possesses its advantages, this test figures undeniably supports the AMD RX 6650. Reach your decision with this in mind. This performance gap is substantial enough to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 6650M

A310

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,792

768 -57.1%

Shaders

1,792

768 -57.1%

TMUs

112

32 -71.4%

ROPs

16 -75.0%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2068 MHz

1750 MHz

Boost Clock

2416 MHz

1750 MHz

Game Clock

2222 MHz

—

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

4,096 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

128 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

224.0 GB/s

124.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

2 MB

4 MB

L3 Cache

32 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

154.6 GPixel/s

28.00 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

270.6 GTexel/s

56.00 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

8.659 TFLOPS

2.688 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

541.2 GFLOPS (1:16)

672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

17.32 TFLOPS (2:1)

5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

6 -78.6%

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

120 W

30 W

TDP (W)

120

30 -75.0%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 23

DG2-128

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)

Alchemist (Arc 3)

Process Size

7 nm

6 nm

Transistors

11,060 million

7,200 million

Die Size

237 mm²

157 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

46.7M / mm²

45.9M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Single-slot

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Xe Graphics

Successor

—

Battlemage

View Radeon RX 6650M Details View Arc A310 Details