AMD Radeon RX 6550S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 6550S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

The AMD Radeon RX 6550S and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER occupy entirely different segments of the mobile and desktop GPU landscape. The RX 6550S is a low-power integrated-class part from the Radeon RX 6000 series, built for thin-and-light portable devices, while the RTX 5070 SUPER is a high-end discrete card from the GeForce 50-series aimed at demanding workloads. The recorded data shows a massive performance gulf, with the RTX 5070 SUPER delivering a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690, while the RX 6550S has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The RTX 5070 SUPER sits at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of recorded parts, whereas the RX 6550S sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating no comparable measurement exists.

Where Each One Wins

The performance split between these two parts is not competitive in any conventional sense. The RTX 5070 SUPER wins every measurable category in the database, primarily because the RX 6550S has no recorded benchmark entries. The RX 6550S is designed for a specific niche: portable devices where power consumption is the dominant constraint. Its 50 W TDP and IGP slot width confirm that it is intended for compact, battery-powered systems where discrete graphics would be impractical. The RTX 5070 SUPER, with its 275 W TDP and dual-slot form factor, is built for full-sized desktop systems where performance takes priority over energy efficiency.

In terms of raw throughput, the RTX 5070 SUPER dominates. Its FP32 compute of 32.15 TFLOPS dwarfs the RX 6550S's 4.915 TFLOPS, a difference of roughly 6.5 times. The texture rate follows the same pattern: 502.4 GTexel/s versus 153.6 GTexel/s. Pixel rate shows a similarly lopsided comparison, with 201.0 GPixel/s against 76.80 GPixel/s. The RTX 5070 SUPER also holds a decisive advantage in memory bandwidth, delivering 672.0 GB/s compared to 128.0 GB/s. Every metric in the database points to the same conclusion: the RTX 5070 SUPER is designed for high-resolution gaming, content creation, and compute-intensive tasks, while the RX 6550S is a low-power solution for basic graphics acceleration in portable devices.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and use different manufacturing processes. The RX 6550S uses the Navi 24 chip based on RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, also fabricated at TSMC but on a 5 nm process. The transistor counts reflect the scale difference: the RX 6550S contains 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, while the RTX 5070 SUPER packs 31,100 million transistors onto a 263 mm² die. Transistor density is notably higher on the newer part, at 118.3M per mm² versus 50.5M per mm².

The core configurations differ substantially. The RX 6550S has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware is present on both, but the RTX 5070 SUPER carries 50 RT cores versus 16 on the RX 6550S. The RTX 5070 SUPER additionally includes 200 tensor cores, a feature that the RX 6550S lacks entirely. This tensor core count is significant for AI-accelerated workloads, which the RDNA 2.0 part cannot accelerate through dedicated hardware.

Clock speeds also differ. The RX 6550S has a base clock of 2000 MHz, a game clock of 2170 MHz, and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The RTX 5070 SUPER runs at a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz, with no game clock listed. The memory subsystems are architecturally distinct: the RX 6550S uses GDDR6 with a 64-bit bus, while the RTX 5070 SUPER uses GDDR7 with a 192-bit bus. The memory clock details reflect this: the RX 6550S runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the RTX 5070 SUPER runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective. The FP16 performance also differs in ratio: the RX 6550S delivers 9.830 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32, while the RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, indicating a different compute architecture for half-precision operations.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only recorded benchmark in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which was run on the RTX 5070 SUPER. It scored 2690 points. The RX 6550S has no benchmark entries, so no direct head-to-head comparison is possible from the recorded data. Instead, the RTX 5070 SUPER can be placed relative to its nearest rivals in the database. It sits 1% above the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M, which averages 2664 points, and 1.1% above both the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662 points and the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660 points. It is 1.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440, which averages 2645 points.

These deltas are small, but they place the RTX 5070 SUPER in a specific performance tier. The percentile ranking of 18 means that, despite its modern architecture and high specifications, the recorded Steel Nomad score places it in the lower fifth of all GPUs in the database. This is an unusual result for a 50-series part with 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and it suggests that the benchmark result may not fully represent the card's capability in other workloads. The RX 6550S, with no recorded score, cannot be positioned relative to any GPU in the database.

The absence of head-to-head benchmarks means the comparison relies entirely on specification differences. The RTX 5070 SUPER's FP32 throughput is 6.5 times higher, its texture rate is 3.3 times higher, its pixel rate is 2.6 times higher, and its memory bandwidth is 5.25 times higher. The shading unit count is 6.25 times higher, and the RT core count is 3.1 times higher. These ratios consistently indicate that the RTX 5070 SUPER operates in a completely different performance class.

Specification Differences

The table below summarizes the key specification differences between the two GPUs, based strictly on the recorded data.

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 6550S | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 5,400 million | 31,100 million |

| Die size | 107 mm² | 263 mm² |

| Base clock | 2000 MHz | 2325 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | 2512 MHz |

| Memory size | 4 GB | 18 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus | 64 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1024 | 6400 |

| TMUs | 64 | 200 |

| ROPs | 32 | 80 |

| RT cores | 16 | 50 |

| Tensor cores | None | 200 |

| FP32 | 4.915 TFLOPS | 32.15 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 9.830 TFLOPS (2:1) | 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 50 W | 275 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 245 mm length, 115 mm height, 40 mm width |

| Release date | 2023-01-03 | 2025-12-31 |

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The RTX 5070 SUPER adds tensor cores, which the RX 6550S does not have, and uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface compared to PCIe 4.0 x4. The RX 6550S is listed as having no power connectors and an IGP slot width, confirming its integrated-class design, while the RTX 5070 SUPER requires a 16-pin connector and a dual-slot cooler. The RTX 5070 SUPER is also physically larger, with listed dimensions of 245 mm by 115 mm by 40 mm, whereas the RX 6550S has no physical dimensions recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, while the AMD Radeon RX 6550S has 1024.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 6550S support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 16 RT cores, which is fewer than the 50 RT cores on the RTX 5070 SUPER.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 672.0 GB/s over a 192-bit GDDR7 bus, while the RX 6550S delivers 128.0 GB/s over a 64-bit GDDR6 bus.

Q: Which GPU has tensor cores?

A: Only the RTX 5070 SUPER has tensor cores, with a count of 200. The RX 6550S has none listed.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The RX 6550S has a TDP of 50 W, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 2690, which is 1% above the Quadro K1100M, 1.1% above the GT 1030, and 1.7% above the GT 440.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear separation of purpose. The AMD Radeon RX 6550S is a 50 W RDNA 2.0 part with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 64-bit bus, and 1024 shading units. It is intended for portable devices where the IGP slot width and lack of power connectors are defining characteristics. Its 4.915 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth are sufficient for lightweight graphics tasks but place it far below any discrete gaming card.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a 275 W Blackwell 2.0 card with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory, a 192-bit bus, 6400 shading units, 200 tensor cores, and 50 RT cores. Its 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 672.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface position it as a high-end desktop component. The recorded Steel Nomad score of 2690 and the 18th percentile ranking indicate that, within this specific benchmark, it outperforms most recorded GPUs, though the nearest rivals are all within 1.7% of its score.

Users selecting between these two parts should base the decision on the intended system form factor and workload. The RX 6550S fits only in portable, low-power devices with integrated graphics. The RTX 5070 SUPER requires a desktop system with a dual-slot PCIe slot, a 16-pin power connector, and sufficient cooling for a 275 W TDP. No benchmark data exists for the RX 6550S, so no direct performance comparison can be made from the database, but the specification differences alone indicate that the RTX 5070 SUPER is the only option for demanding graphics workloads.