AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M is a mobile-first Kepler part from 2013, while the AMD Radeon RX 560 is a desktop Polaris card from 2017. Benchmark data shows the RX 560 dominates in every recorded test, with the only head-to-head result favoring AMD by 66%. However, the GTX 760M holds a higher overall percentile ranking (31st versus 26th), which reflects differences in how the database weights legacy and mobile workloads. For users, this is not a close contest: the RX 560 is the faster GPU by a wide margin, while the GTX 760M offers compatibility with older laptops and a smaller power envelope.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark suite gives the AMD Radeon RX 560 a clear win in raw compute and graphics performance. In the sole direct comparison, Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 560 scores 16,472 against the GTX 760M’s 5,604, a 66% deficit for the NVIDIA part. This is not a marginal gap; it reflects fundamentally different hardware generations. The RX 560 also posts strong results in other tests not run on the GTX 760M, such as PassMark G3D at 3,671 and PassMark GPU Compute at 1,437, suggesting balanced performance across DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 workloads.

The GTX 760M, by contrast, has no recorded wins in any benchmark. Its only two scores are Geekbench OpenCL (5,604) and Geekbench Vulkan (4,868), both far below the RX 560’s OpenCL result. Its average benchmark score is 5,236, which is actually higher than the RX 560’s average of 4,569, but that average is skewed by the RX 560’s inclusion of many lower-scoring PassMark tests. The GTX 760M’s percentile rank of 31 versus 26 for the RX 560 suggests that in the database’s full GPU population, the GTX 760M sits slightly higher relative to all other GPUs, likely because many mobile parts score lower in desktop-oriented tests.

Where the GTX 760M does “win” is in power efficiency and form factor. Its TDP is 55 W versus 75 W for the RX 560, and it uses a MXM module slot, which is designed for laptops and small-form-factor systems. The RX 560 is a dual-slot desktop card with a 250 W suggested PSU. For a user constrained by a laptop chassis or a low-wattage power supply, the GTX 760M is the only viable option, but that is a niche advantage, not a performance one.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, choose the AMD Radeon RX 560 for any task that demands modern GPU throughput. Its OpenCL score is nearly triple that of the GTX 760M, and its DirectX 12 support (version 12_0) is more robust than the GTX 760M’s partial DirectX 12 (11_0). The RX 560 also has double the memory (4 GB versus 2 GB) and memory bandwidth (112.0 GB/s versus 64.13 GB/s), which matters for texture-heavy workloads or higher resolutions.

Choose the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M only if you need a low-power, mobile GPU. Its 55 W TDP and MXM form factor make it suitable for older laptops where the RX 560 cannot physically fit. The GTX 760M also has a higher percentile rank (31st versus 26th), which may reflect its suitability for legacy applications that favor Kepler’s architecture. However, in every measurable performance test in the database, the RX 560 is faster, often by a factor of two or more. The GTX 760M’s average benchmark score of 5,236 is higher than the RX 560’s 4,569, but that average includes many low-scoring PassMark tests for the RX 560, such as DirectX 9 at 57 and G2D at 485, which are not representative of gaming or compute workloads.

For gaming, the RX 560 is the clear pick. Its PassMark DirectX 11 score of 25 and DirectX 12 score of 21, while low in absolute terms, are not comparable to the GTX 760M’s lack of such tests, but the OpenCL gap alone is decisive. For compute, the RX 560’s 2.611 TFLOPS FP32 performance dwarfs the GTX 760M’s 1,104.4 GFLOPS. The GTX 760M has no FP16 support, while the RX 560 offers FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, though the database does not record FP16 benchmarks for either card.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison in the database is Geekbench OpenCL, where the AMD Radeon RX 560 scores 16,472 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M scores 5,604. The RX 560 wins by 66%, which is a massive margin. This test measures general-purpose compute on the GPU, and the result aligns with the hardware specifications: the RX 560 has 1,024 shading units versus 768, a boost clock of 1,275 MHz versus 719 MHz, and a process node of 14 nm versus 28 nm.

The RX 560’s other benchmarks reinforce its dominance, even though they have no direct counterpart on the GTX 760M. Its PassMark G3D score of 3,671 and GPU Compute score of 1,437 indicate that it handles both rasterization and compute tasks well. The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 57 is notably high, suggesting strong legacy API performance. The GTX 760M’s Vulkan score of 4,868 is its second-best result, but Vulkan support on Kepler is limited compared to GCN 4.0, and the RX 560’s Vulkan version is 1.3 versus 1.2.175 for the GTX 760M.

In terms of memory, the RX 560’s 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is about 75% higher than the GTX 760M’s 64.13 GB/s, and its 4 GB capacity doubles the GTX 760M’s 2 GB. Both use GDDR5 and a 128-bit bus, so the bandwidth difference comes from the RX 560’s higher memory clock (1750 MHz versus 1002 MHz). The RX 560 also has a higher pixel rate (20.40 GPixel/s versus 11.50 GPixel/s) and texture rate (81.60 GTexel/s versus 46.02 GTexel/s), which directly impacts fill-rate-bound scenarios like high-resolution rendering or heavy post-processing.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M has an average benchmark score of 5,236, while the AMD Radeon RX 560 has an average of 4,569. However, this average is misleading because the RX 560’s scores include several low PassMark results, while the GTX 760M only has two Geekbench scores.

Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 560 faster in OpenCL?

A: Yes, the RX 560 scores 16,472 in Geekbench OpenCL, compared to 5,604 for the GTX 760M, a 66% advantage for AMD.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The GTX 760M has a TDP of 55 W, while the RX 560 has a TDP of 75 W. The RX 560 also lists a suggested PSU of 250 W, while the GTX 760M has no suggested PSU field.

Q: Which card supports more modern DirectX?

A: The RX 560 supports DirectX 12 (12_0), while the GTX 760M supports DirectX 12 (11_0), which is a partial implementation. The RX 560 also supports Vulkan 1.3, while the GTX 760M supports Vulkan 1.2.175.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The GTX 760M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, while the RX 560 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory. Both use a 128-bit bus.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The GTX 760M is in the 31st percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 560 is in the 26th percentile. This ranking is based on all GPUs in the database, not just these two.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M uses the GK106S chip, based on the Kepler architecture, manufactured on a 28 nm process at TSMC. It has 2,540 million transistors on a 221 mm² die, with a transistor density of 11.5 million per mm². The AMD Radeon RX 560 uses the Polaris 21 chip, based on GCN 4.0, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It has 3,000 million transistors on a 123 mm² die, with a transistor density of 24.4 million per mm². The RX 560’s smaller die and higher density indicate a more modern manufacturing process, which contributes to its higher clock speeds and efficiency.

The GTX 760M’s Kepler architecture was designed for the GeForce 700M generation, with a base clock of 628 MHz and a boost clock of 719 MHz. It has 768 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. The RX 560’s GCN 4.0 architecture, from the Polaris generation, has a base clock of 1175 MHz and a boost clock of 1275 MHz, with 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The RX 560’s shading unit count is 33% higher, and its clock speeds are nearly double, explaining the large performance gap.

Memory architecture is similar in bus width (128-bit for both) but different in speed. The GTX 760M runs memory at 1002 MHz (4 Gbps effective), while the RX 560 runs at 1750 MHz (7 Gbps effective). Both use GDDR5, but the RX 560’s faster memory yields 112.0 GB/s versus 64.13 GB/s. The RX 560 also supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, while the GTX 760M has no FP16 capability listed. Neither card has dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in almost every specification. The GTX 760M has a base clock of 628 MHz and a boost of 719 MHz, while the RX 560 has a base of 1175 MHz and a boost of 1275 MHz. The GTX 760M has 768 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 16 ROPs; the RX 560 has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The GTX 760M’s pixel rate is 11.50 GPixel/s and texture rate is 46.02 GTexel/s, while the RX 560’s are 20.40 GPixel/s and 81.60 GTexel/s, respectively. FP32 performance is 1,104.4 GFLOPS for the GTX 760M and 2.611 TFLOPS for the RX 560.

Memory capacity is 2 GB versus 4 GB, and bandwidth is 64.13 GB/s versus 112.0 GB/s. The GTX 760M has a TDP of 55 W, while the RX 560 has a TDP of 75 W. The GTX 760M uses a MXM module slot, while the RX 560 is dual-slot with a length of 170 mm (6.7 inches). The GTX 760M has no power connectors, and the RX 560 also has none, but the RX 560 lists a suggested PSU of 250 W. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16 for the GTX 760M and PCIe 3.0 x8 for the RX 560. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent for the GTX 760M, while the RX 560 has 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, and 1x DisplayPort 1.4a. The GTX 760M supports DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.175; the RX 560 supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Release dates are May 2013 for the GTX 760M and April 2017 for the RX 560. The GTX 760M has a transistor count of 2,540 million on a 221 mm² die, while the RX 560 has 3,000 million on a 123 mm² die.