AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

CORE STATE Navi 14
VRAM 3 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1445 MHz
TDP 85 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 1.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2019
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
36,529
212,363
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
6,604
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
225,122
passmark_directx_10
N/A
192
passmark_directx_11
N/A
300
passmark_directx_12
N/A
127
passmark_directx_9
N/A
351
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,332
passmark_g3d
N/A
32,974
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
20,203

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark recorded in the database for both GPUs is Geekbench OpenCL. In this test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 points, while the AMD Radeon RX 5300M manages 36,529 points. That is a delta of 481.4% in favor of the NVIDIA part, making it more than five times faster in raw compute throughput. This is the sole head-to-head data point, so the overall win count stands at one for NVIDIA and zero for AMD.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the RTX 5070 Ti's average benchmark score is 49,957 across ten recorded tests, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50,001 (a negligible 0.1% deficit), the Intel Arc A550M at 49,737 (a 0.4% lead for NVIDIA), the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT at 50,951 (a 2% gap), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at 48,477 (a 3.1% advantage). These numbers show the RTX 5070 Ti sitting in a tight cluster of high-end desktop cards, where differences of a few percent are common.

The RX 5300M, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 36,529 from a single Geekbench OpenCL run, placing it in the 80th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X at 36,530 (essentially tied), the NVIDIA T1000 at 36,289 (0.7% faster), the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 at 37,157 (1.7% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro Duo at 35,860 (1.9% ahead). The RX 5300M is therefore competitive with older desktop flagships and professional workstation cards, but it operates in a completely different performance tier than the RTX 5070 Ti.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti wins decisively in every measurable category. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 212,363 versus 36,529 for the RX 5300M represents a 481.4% advantage, which translates to roughly 5.8 times the compute performance. In the database's recorded wins tally, NVIDIA takes the only head-to-head victory.

For the RTX 5070 Ti, the strengths are spread across its benchmark suite. Its Passmark G3D score of 32,974 and Passmark GPU Compute score of 20,203 indicate strong general 3D rendering and compute workloads. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 225,122 further confirms its capability in cross-platform graphics APIs. Its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 127 and DirectX 11 score of 300 are modest, but these are relative to the card's own internal test suite, not direct comparisons with the RX 5300M.

The RX 5300M's only recorded benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL at 36,529, which places it near the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X (36,530) and ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35,860) by 1.9%. This suggests that for mobile users, the RX 5300M delivers performance comparable to a high-end desktop GPU from several generations ago, but it cannot approach the RTX 5070 Ti's absolute performance level. The data does not record any benchmark where the RX 5300M wins outright, so its utility is limited to lower-power, portable scenarios rather than raw performance.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different eras and design philosophies. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process, with 45,600 million transistors packed into a 378 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The AMD Radeon RX 5300M uses the Navi 14 chip on TSMC's 7 nm node, with 6,400 million transistors on a 158 mm² die, giving a density of 40.5 million per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti thus has roughly 7.1 times more transistors and a die that is 2.4 times larger, while using a more advanced manufacturing process.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The RTX 5070 Ti comes with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 5300M has 3 GB of GDDR6 on a 96 bit bus, with 168.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a 5.3 times difference in memory capacity and a 5.3 times difference in bandwidth, closely mirroring the compute gap.

The compute resources are heavily skewed toward NVIDIA. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. Its FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The RX 5300M has 1,408 shading units, 88 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no RT cores or tensor cores listed. Its FP32 is 4.069 TFLOPS and FP16 is 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1), meaning half-rate FP16. The RTX 5070 Ti delivers 10.8 times the FP32 throughput of the RX 5300M.

Clock speeds also differ. The RTX 5070 Ti has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2452 MHz, while the RX 5300M runs at a 1000 MHz base, 1445 MHz boost, and 1181 MHz game clock. Despite lower clocks, the RX 5300M's power draw is far lower at 85 W versus 300 W for the RTX 5070 Ti, which is expected given the mobile orientation of the AMD part.

Other differences include the RTX 5070 Ti's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface versus the RX 5300M's PCIe 4.0 x8, and the NVIDIA card's display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b) versus the AMD card's "Portable Device Dependent" outputs. The RTX 5070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the RX 5300M supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4. Both support OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot design with a 16-pin power connector and a suggested 700 W PSU, while the RX 5300M has no external power connector, consistent with a mobile implementation.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 5300M by 481.4% in the only shared benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL. That places them in entirely separate performance leagues. The RTX 5070 Ti sits at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, trading nearly even with the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and RX 6900 XT, while the RX 5300M sits at the 80th percentile, matching the GeForce GTX TITAN X.

For users who need maximum compute performance, the RTX 5070 Ti is the clear choice. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, 896 GB/s bandwidth, and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 make it suitable for demanding gaming, rendering, and compute workloads. It also brings RT cores and tensor cores, which the RX 5300M lacks entirely. The RTX 5070 Ti is an active product, launched in February 2025, with a launch MSRP of 749 USD.

The RX 5300M, being an end-of-life mobile part from late 2019, offers a fundamentally different value proposition. Its 85 W power envelope and lack of external power connectors make it suitable for thin-and-light laptops, but its 3 GB GDDR6 memory and 168 GB/s bandwidth will limit it to less demanding titles and workloads. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 36,529 is competitive with desktop GPUs from the GTX TITAN X era, but that is not a modern performance baseline.

The verdict from the recorded data: the RTX 5070 Ti is for users who prioritize performance above all else, while the RX 5300M serves a niche where power efficiency and portability matter more than raw throughput. There is no scenario in the benchmark data where the RX 5300M wins, so anyone choosing it would be making a trade-off for mobility, not performance.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti than the AMD Radeon RX 5300M in the shared benchmark?

A: In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 versus 36,529 for the RX 5300M, a 481.4% difference in favor of NVIDIA.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the RX 5300M has 3 GB of GDDR6 on a 96 bit bus with 168.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 5300M support ray tracing?

A: No. The database records no RT cores for the RX 5300M, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP with a suggested 700 W PSU and a 16-pin connector. The RX 5300M has an 85 W TDP and no external power connectors.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each GPU in the database?

A: For the RTX 5070 Ti, the closest is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50,001 (0.1% lower). For the RX 5300M, the closest is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X at 36,530 (essentially tied).

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti is listed as Active, released in February 2025. The RX 5300M is End-of-life, released in November 2019.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 5300M
RTX 5070 Ti
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,408
8,960 +536.4%
Shaders
1,408
8,960 +536.4%
TMUs
88
280 +218.2%
ROPs
32
96 +200.0%
Compute Units
22
—
SM Count
—
70
Clocks
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
1445 MHz
2452 MHz
Game Clock
1181 MHz
—
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
3 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
3,072
16,384 +433.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
96 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
168.0 GB/s
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
—
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.24 GPixel/s
235.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
127.2 GTexel/s
686.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.069 TFLOPS
43.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
—
70
Tensor Cores
—
280
Power
TDP
85 W
300 W
TDP (W)
85
300 +252.9%
Suggested PSU
—
700 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Navi 14
GB203
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 5000M)
GeForce 50
Process Size
7 nm
5 nm
Transistors
6,400 million
45,600 million
Die Size
158 mm²
378 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
40.5M / mm²
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
—
Dual-slot
Length
—
304 mm 12 inches
Height
—
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
749 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
GeForce 40
Successor
—
GeForce 60
View Radeon RX 5300M Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Details