AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark recorded for both GPUs is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is decisively one-sided. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267 points, while the AMD Radeon RX 5300M manages 36,529 points. That is a delta of 81.7% in favor of the NVIDIA card, meaning the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers roughly five and a half times the OpenCL compute throughput of the RX 5300M. There are no benchmark categories where the AMD part wins; the head-to-head record stands at zero wins for the RX 5300M and one win for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.

Looking at the broader database context, the RX 5300M sits at the 80th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 36,529. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 36,530 (0% delta), the NVIDIA T1000 scores 36,289 (0.7% behind), the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37,157 (1.7% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro Duo scores 35,860 (1.9% behind). This shows the RX 5300M is a mid-pack mobile part, competitive with older desktop workstation cards but nowhere near modern high-end silicon.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 31,087 across all recorded tests, but that figure includes many different workloads. Its percentile ranking is 76th, slightly lower than the RX 5300M, but this is misleading because the RTX card runs a much wider and more demanding suite of tests. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (31,206, 0.4% ahead), the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q (31,220, 0.4% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (31,532, 1.4% ahead), and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (31,676, 1.9% ahead). The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER actually trails these rivals slightly, but that is because the average includes legacy DirectX 9 and 2D tests where modern cards do not scale as expected. In raw compute, the OpenCL result is the clearest indicator of the massive gap between the two.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide here is generational and fundamental. The AMD Radeon RX 5300M uses the Navi 14 chip built on RDNA 1.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 6,400 million transistors on a 158 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 40.5 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a 5 nm node. That die packs 45,900 million transistors into 379 mm², resulting in a density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip has over seven times the transistor count and more than double the die area, which alone explains most of the performance differential.

The RX 5300M has 1,408 shading units, 88 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. It has no dedicated ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, because RDNA 1.0 predates AMD's dedicated RT hardware. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER fields 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, which are absent entirely from the AMD part. The FP32 compute rating tells the story clearly: 4.069 TFLOPS for the RX 5300M versus 44.10 TFLOPS for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, a factor of nearly 11. For FP16, the AMD card achieves 8.138 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio, while NVIDIA hits 44.10 TFLOPS at 1:1, meaning the RTX card does not sacrifice precision for speed.

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The RX 5300M outputs 46.24 GPixel/s and 127.2 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s. Memory architecture differs as well: the AMD card uses 3 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 168.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s. The NVIDIA memory bandwidth is exactly four times higher, and the capacity is more than five times larger. The bus interface also differs: PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for NVIDIA, though in practice this matters less than the compute disparity.

Where Each One Wins

There is no benchmark category in the recorded data where the AMD Radeon RX 5300M beats the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The only head-to-head test, Geekbench OpenCL, goes entirely to NVIDIA with an 81.7% margin. The RX 5300M is competitive only within its own performance class, where it trades blows with the GeForce GTX TITAN X, T1000, Radeon PRO W6400, and Radeon Pro Duo. Those are the cards a builder should compare against the RX 5300M, not a 40-series flagship.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins across every workload that the database records. Its PassMark G3D score is 31,811, its PassMark GPU Compute score is 18,372, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,569. For legacy APIs, it scores 360 in PassMark DirectX 9, 278 in DirectX 11, 181 in DirectX 10, and 119 in DirectX 12. Its 2D performance is 1,225 in PassMark G2D. The RX 5300M has no recorded scores in any of these tests, so the only direct comparison is OpenCL, where NVIDIA dominates.

For use cases, the data suggests the RX 5300M is suited for light mobile workloads, older games, or compute tasks that do not require ray tracing or tensor acceleration. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is suited for modern gaming with ray tracing, AI workloads via tensor cores, and high-resolution texture-heavy scenarios given its 16 GB frame buffer. The RTX card also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the AMD card is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1), meaning the NVIDIA part can handle newer rendering features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading at the hardware level.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 7 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 6,400 million | 45,900 million |

| Die size | 158 mm² | 379 mm² |

| Transistor density | 40.5M / mm² | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base clock | 1000 MHz | 2340 MHz |

| Boost clock | 1445 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory clock | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) |

| Memory size | 3 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |

| Memory bus | 96 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 672.3 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1408 | 8448 |

| TMUs | 88 | 264 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT cores | None | 66 |

| Tensor cores | None | 264 |

| FP32 | 4.069 TFLOPS | 44.10 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| Pixel rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | 250.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 689.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 85 W | 285 W |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 600 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Slot width | None | Triple-slot |

| Dimensions | None | 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm |

| DirectX support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Release date | 2019-11-12 | 2024-01-23 |

| Production status | End-of-life | End-of-life |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 versus 4.069 TFLOPS for the AMD Radeon RX 5300M, a difference of roughly 11x.

Q: Can the AMD card do ray tracing?

A: No. The RX 5300M has no ray tracing cores listed in the database, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 dedicated RT cores.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each card have?

A: The AMD card has 168.0 GB/s on a 96-bit bus with 3 GB GDDR6. The NVIDIA card has 672.3 GB/s on a 256-bit bus with 16 GB GDDR6X, which is exactly four times the bandwidth.

Q: What is the head-to-head benchmark result?

A: In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267 against 36,529 for the RX 5300M, a margin of 81.7% in favor of NVIDIA.

Q: Which card requires more power?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W and requires a 600 W PSU with a 16-pin connector. The RX 5300M has a TDP of 85 W and uses no external power connectors.

Q: Are these cards still in production?

A: Both are listed as end-of-life in the database. The RX 5300M released on 2019-11-12, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER released on 2024-01-23.

The Verdict

The data makes one thing unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is in a completely different performance tier from the AMD Radeon RX 5300M. The OpenCL benchmark shows an 81.7% gap, and the architectural specifications reinforce that with a 10x difference in FP32 throughput, a 4x difference in memory bandwidth, and the presence of dedicated RT and tensor cores that the AMD part simply lacks. Anyone comparing these two for a build should not be choosing between them; the only reason to pick the RX 5300M is if the workload is extremely light, power-constrained, or limited to a mobile form factor with an 85 W budget.

For gamers and creators, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the obvious choice based on every recorded metric. Its 16 GB GDDR6X frame buffer handles large textures, its 66 RT cores enable ray tracing, and its 264 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The triple-slot cooler and 285 W TDP are the price of that performance, but the benchmark scores justify it. For users who need a low-power mobile GPU for basic compute or legacy gaming, the RX 5300M is adequate within its class, as shown by its 80th percentile ranking and close competition with the GTX TITAN X and T1000. But against the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, it is not a contest. The verdict from the database is simple: buy the NVIDIA card if you need performance, and only consider the AMD card if power and size constraints make the 4070 Ti SUPER physically impossible to install.