AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750 Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon R7 M370

CORE STATE Litho
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 960 MHz
TDP —
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE GCN 1.0
nm
PROCESS 28 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2015
VS
Intel
GPU

UHD Graphics P750

CORE STATE Rocket Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 1300 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1
nm
PROCESS 14 nm+++
LAUNCH DATE —

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
7,063
6,554
geekbench_vulkan
6,465
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750

The AMD Radeon R7 M370 and Intel UHD Graphics P750 are both end-of-life graphics solutions that land in the same performance percentile, but the data shows a clear, if narrow, winner. In the only direct benchmark available, the AMD Radeon R7 M370 outperforms the Intel UHD Graphics P750 by 7.8% in Geekbench OpenCL, posting a score of 7063 against 6554. While both GPUs sit at the 38th percentile of all GPUs, the R7 M370's average benchmark score of 6764 is 3.2% higher than the P750's 6554, establishing a consistent, albeit modest, performance advantage across the board.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head comparison is limited to a single Geekbench OpenCL test, but the result is unambiguous. The AMD Radeon R7 M370 delivers a score of 7063, which is 7.8% higher than the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 6554. This is a decisive margin in the context of these two integrated and discrete entry-level parts. A 7.8% delta in raw compute performance translates directly into faster execution of OpenCL-accelerated workloads, making the AMD part the more capable choice for any application that leverages GPU compute.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the R7 M370's average score of 6764 places it just 1% behind the AMD FirePro M5100 (6830) and 2.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M (6946). This positioning shows that the R7 M370 is competitive with a range of older discrete mobile GPUs, holding its own against parts that were considered mid-range in their day. The Intel P750, with its average score of 6554, sits in a similar tier, trailing the AMD Radeon HD 7730M by a mere 0.4% and leading the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M by 0.9%. However, the crucial distinction is that the R7 M370's nearest rivals are generally scoring higher on average, whereas the P750's rivals are clustered closer to its own lower score.

The data reveals a clear performance hierarchy. The R7 M370's 7.8% lead in the head-to-head test is not a statistical anomaly; it is reinforced by the fact that its average score is higher than the P750's peak score in the same test. The Intel part's average is dragged down by its lower OpenCL result, and it has no Vulkan score to bolster its standing, unlike the AMD part which also achieves a 6465 in Geekbench Vulkan. In summary, while both are entry-level performers, the R7 M370 is the faster GPU in every measurable way according to the FACT PACK.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon R7 M370 wins in raw compute performance. It has a decisive 7.8% advantage in Geekbench OpenCL and a higher average benchmark score (6764 vs 6554). This makes it the preferred choice for any workload that is heavily dependent on shader throughput and general-purpose GPU computing. Its dedicated 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with 57.60 GB/s of bandwidth is a significant advantage over the Intel part's system-shared memory, which has system-dependent bandwidth. This dedicated memory allocation means the R7 M370 will not contend with the CPU for memory resources, leading to more consistent performance in memory-intensive tasks.

The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has no benchmark wins in the provided data. However, it does have distinct architectural and feature-based advantages. Its Generation 12.1 architecture is newer than the GCN 1.0 architecture in the AMD part, and it supports DirectX 12 (12_1) compared to the R7 M370's DirectX 12 (11_1). This means the Intel solution is technically capable of running a newer feature level of the DirectX API, which could be relevant for certain modern games or applications that leverage those specific features. It also has a significantly higher pixel rate (41.60 GPixel/s vs 7.680 GPixel/s) and texture rate (83.20 GTexel/s vs 23.04 GTexel/s), which are metrics that can benefit fill-rate-bound scenarios, even if its overall compute is lower. Furthermore, the P750 is an integrated processor with a 15 W TDP, making it inherently more power-efficient than any discrete solution, though no TDP is listed for the R7 M370.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark?

A: The AMD Radeon R7 M370 is faster, scoring 7063 compared to the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 6554, a 7.8% advantage.

Q: How does the average benchmark score of the AMD Radeon R7 M370 compare to the Intel UHD Graphics P750?

A: The AMD Radeon R7 M370 has a higher average benchmark score of 6764, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 averages 6554.

Q: Does the Intel UHD Graphics P750 win any benchmark comparison in the provided data?

A: No. The data shows the AMD Radeon R7 M370 winning the sole head-to-head benchmark (Geekbench OpenCL) with 1 win for the R7 M370 and 0 wins for the Intel P750.

Q: What are the DirectX feature level differences between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which is a newer feature level than the DirectX 12 (11_1) supported by the AMD Radeon R7 M370.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon R7 M370 has a dedicated 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 128-bit bus and 57.60 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses System Shared memory with a System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the performance percentile for both GPUs?

A: Both the AMD Radeon R7 M370 and the Intel UHD Graphics P750 are in the 38th percentile of all GPUs.

Specification Differences

The core specifications reveal a fundamental design split. The AMD Radeon R7 M370 is a discrete GPU with 384 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 8 ROPs. Its base clock is 875 MHz with a boost clock of 960 MHz. It features a dedicated 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 57.60 GB/s of bandwidth. Its process node is 28 nm, and it connects via a PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.

The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is an integrated GPU with a different configuration. It has 256 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Its base clock is significantly lower at 350 MHz, but it boosts to a much higher 1300 MHz. It relies on System Shared memory, meaning its bus width and bandwidth are system-dependent. It is manufactured on a 14 nm+++ process node and uses a Ring Bus interface. The P750 also has a rated TDP of 15 W and a slot width of "IGP," while the R7 M370 has no TDP or slot width listed. Their pixel and texture rates also differ greatly, with the Intel part having 41.60 GPixel/s and 83.20 GTexel/s versus the AMD's 7.680 GPixel/s and 23.04 GTexel/s.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon R7 M370 is built on the Graphics Core Next 1.0 architecture and is manufactured on a 28 nm process at TSMC. It uses 950 million transistors on a 77 mm² die, with a transistor density of 12.3M per mm². This is part of the "Gem System" generation within the R7 M300 series. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is based on Intel's Generation 12.1 architecture, built on a 14 nm+++ process at Intel. It is part of the "HD Graphics-W" generation for the Rocket Lake chip. The Intel part is an IGP, while the AMD part is a discrete chip, which is a fundamental architectural difference.

Feature support also diverges. The AMD R7 M370 supports Vulkan 1.2.170, while the Intel P750 supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer version of the API. The AMD part also has a lower DirectX feature level (11_1) compared to the Intel's 12_1. The Intel P750 is also capable of FP16 compute at 1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1), while no FP16 figure is listed for the AMD part, which only lists FP32 at 737.3 GFLOPS. This suggests the Intel architecture is more modern and feature-rich, even if its raw FP32 performance is lower.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the data, the AMD Radeon R7 M370 is the better performer for general compute and OpenCL-based tasks. Its 7.8% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and its higher average benchmark score make it the outright winner in raw speed. Users who need to run applications that use GPU acceleration for tasks like video encoding, rendering, or data processing will get measurably better performance from the AMD solution. The dedicated VRAM is another clear advantage, as it ensures memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck.

However, the Intel UHD Graphics P750 is not without its merits. Its architecture is more modern and supports a newer DirectX feature level (12_1) and Vulkan version (1.4), which could be a deciding factor for software that relies on these newer API features. Its dramatically higher pixel and texture fill rates are also notable, suggesting it could potentially be faster in certain fill-rate-dependent scenarios, even if the overall compute benchmark is lower. As an integrated part with a 15 W TDP, it is also the clear choice for power-constrained or compact systems.

The choice between them is a function of the user's priorities. If the primary goal is maximum compute performance in existing applications, the AMD Radeon R7 M370 is the winner. If the priorities are a more modern feature set, lower power consumption, and an integrated form factor, the Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the more suitable, albeit slower, option. The data shows the AMD part is the faster GPU, while the Intel part is the more modern and efficient one.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
R7 M370
UHD Graphics P750
Core Specs
Shading Units
384
256 -33.3%
Shaders
384
256 -33.3%
TMUs
24
64 +166.7%
ROPs
8
32 +300.0%
Compute Units
6
—
Execution Units
—
32
Clocks
Base Clock
875 MHz
350 MHz
Boost Clock
960 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz 3.6 Gbps effective
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
2 GB
System Shared
VRAM (MB)
2,048
—
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
128 bit
System Shared
Bandwidth
57.60 GB/s
System Dependent
Cache
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
—
L2 Cache
256 KB
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
7.680 GPixel/s
41.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
23.04 GTexel/s
83.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
737.3 GFLOPS
665.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
46.08 GFLOPS (1:16)
166.4 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
—
1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1)
Power
TDP
—
15 W
TDP (W)
—
15
Architecture
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Generation 12.1
GPU Name
Litho
Rocket Lake
Generation
Gem System (R7 M300)
HD Graphics-W (Rocket Lake)
Process Size
28 nm
14 nm+++
Transistors
950 million
—
Die Size
77 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Density
12.3M / mm²
—
API Support
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.4
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
3.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
—
IGP
Outputs
—
Motherboard Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Ring Bus
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Solar System
—
Successor
Polaris Mobile
—
View Radeon R7 M370 Details View UHD Graphics P750 Details