AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 represent two vastly different eras of GPU design. The RTX 5090 D is a current-generation flagship built on a 5 nm process, while the WX 8200 is an end-of-life workstation card from 2018 using a 14 nm process. Benchmark data shows the RTX 5090 D leads by 345.3% in Geekbench OpenCL and 445.7% in Geekbench Vulkan, making the comparison less a contest and more a demonstration of generational progress.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200?

A: In the head-to-head benchmarks, the RTX 5090 D is 345.3% faster in Geekbench OpenCL and 445.7% faster in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 77,712 is 11.2% higher than the WX 8200's average of 69,870.

Q: Which GPU wins the overall benchmark comparison?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D wins both head-to-head tests, taking 2 wins against 0 for the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200. The RTX 5090 D also holds a higher percentile rank at 92 versus 90 for the WX 8200.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The RTX 5090 D features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The WX 8200 uses 8 GB of HBM2 on a 2048-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5090 D has four times the capacity and over three times the bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 5090 D has a TDP of 575 W and requires a 950 W suggested PSU, using a single 16-pin connector. The WX 8200 has a 230 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU, using one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector.

Q: Which card supports newer PCIe and display standards?

A: The RTX 5090 D uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and outputs include HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b. The WX 8200 is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16 and provides four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Q: Are these cards comparable in compute performance?

A: No. The RTX 5090 D delivers 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, while the WX 8200 delivers 10.75 TFLOPS FP32—a nearly tenfold difference in raw shader throughput.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is fundamental. The RTX 5090 D is built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB202 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 92,200 million transistors into a 750 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The WX 8200 uses AMD's older GCN 5.0 architecture with the Vega 10 chip, produced on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It contains 12,500 million transistors on a 495 mm² die, with a much lower density of 25.3M per mm².

The RTX 5090 D includes dedicated hardware that the WX 8200 completely lacks. It has 170 RT cores for ray tracing and 680 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The WX 8200 has no RT cores and no tensor cores, meaning it cannot accelerate ray tracing or tensor-based workloads in hardware. The RTX 5090 D also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the WX 8200 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.3.

The memory subsystems reflect different design philosophies. The RTX 5090 D uses 32 GB of GDDR7 across a 512-bit bus, reaching 1.79 TB/s. The WX 8200 uses 8 GB of HBM2 across a 2048-bit bus, which is wider but slower at 512.0 GB/s. The RTX 5090 D's process node advantage is also evident: 5 nm versus 14 nm allows nearly five times the transistor density, enabling dramatically higher core counts and clock speeds.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D wins in every measurable benchmark category. In the head-to-head Geekbench tests, it dominates OpenCL with a score of 310,674 versus 69,774, and Vulkan with 376,915 versus 69,076. Beyond those, the RTX 5090 D has a full suite of PassMark scores—DirectX 10 at 231, DirectX 11 at 371, DirectX 12 at 219, DirectX 9 at 434, G2D at 1,487, G3D at 44,065, and GPU compute at 28,396. The WX 8200 has no equivalent DirectX or PassMark scores in the data, only Geekbench Metal at 70,759, OpenCL at 69,774, and Vulkan at 69,076.

The RTX 5090 D is the clear choice for any workload requiring maximum compute throughput, ray tracing, or AI features. Its 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and identical 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) performance make it exceptionally strong for both single-precision and half-precision workloads. The WX 8200 offers 10.75 TFLOPS FP32 but doubles to 21.50 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), which is its only relative strength—though still far below the RTX 5090 D's absolute numbers.

For legacy compatibility, the WX 8200's four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs might suit older display setups, while the RTX 5090 D's HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b support modern high-bandwidth displays. The WX 8200's lower 230 W TDP and 550 W PSU requirement make it easier to integrate into power-constrained systems, but this comes with a massive performance trade-off.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |

| Transistors | 92,200 million | 12,500 million |

| Die Size | 750 mm² | 495 mm² |

| Base Clock | 2017 MHz | 1200 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 1500 MHz |

| Memory Size | 32 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | HBM2 |

| Memory Bus | 512 bit | 2048 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 1.79 TB/s | 512.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 21760 | 3584 |

| TMUs | 680 | 224 |

| ROPs | 176 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 170 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 680 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 423.6 GPixel/s | 96.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 1,636.8 GTexel/s | 336.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) | 21.50 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 575 W | 230 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 950 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-29 | 2018-08-12 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Geekbench OpenCL test shows the RTX 5090 D scoring 310,674 against the WX 8200's 69,774, a delta of 345.3%. This gap reflects the RTX 5090 D's 21760 shading units versus 3584, and its 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 versus 10.75 TFLOPS. The RTX 5090 D's 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth also feeds its compute units far more effectively than the WX 8200's 512.0 GB/s.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5090 D scores 376,915 versus 69,076, a 445.7% advantage. This is the largest margin in any shared test. The RTX 5090 D's Vulkan 1.4 support and modern architecture likely contribute to its superior performance in this API, while the WX 8200's Vulkan 1.3 and older GCN design hold it back.

The RTX 5090 D's average benchmark score of 77,712 places it near the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79,605, delta -2.4%) and Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79,396, delta -2.1%). The WX 8200's average of 69,870 sits near the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (69,986, delta -0.2%) and RTX A3000 Mobile (70,140, delta -0.4%). These rival comparisons show the RTX 5090 D competing with older data-center accelerators, while the WX 8200 aligns with mid-range professional cards.

In absolute terms, the RTX 5090 D's PassMark G3D score of 44,065 and GPU compute score of 28,396 have no WX 8200 counterpart in the data. The WX 8200's Geekbench Metal score of 70,759 is its only unique benchmark, but Metal is not available on the RTX 5090 D, so no direct comparison exists.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is the superior GPU in every shared benchmark, with margins exceeding 345% in OpenCL and 445% in Vulkan. It offers 32 GB of GDDR7 memory versus 8 GB of HBM2, 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 versus 10.75 TFLOPS, and includes RT and tensor cores that the WX 8200 lacks entirely. Anyone needing maximum compute performance, ray tracing, or AI acceleration should choose the RTX 5090 D.

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 remains relevant only for specific legacy scenarios. Its 230 W TDP and 550 W PSU requirement make it far easier to power, and its four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs may suit older multi-display workstation setups. Its FP16 performance of 21.50 TFLOPS (2:1) is double its FP32 rate, which could benefit certain half-precision workloads—but even that is a fraction of the RTX 5090 D's 104.8 TFLOPS FP16.

The RTX 5090 D is an active product with future successor (GeForce 60) already listed, while the WX 8200 is end-of-life with the Radeon Pro Vega as its successor. The RTX 5090 D's launch MSRP of 2,299 USD reflects its flagship status, while the WX 8200 launched at 999 USD. For any modern workload, the RTX 5090 D is the only rational choice. The WX 8200's sole advantages are lower power draw and older display connectivity, which do not compensate for a 345% performance deficit.