AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 are two very different GPUs that land within 1.4% of each other in average benchmark score, making this a close contest between a modern RDNA 2.0 gaming card and a workstation-oriented GCN 5.0 behemoth. The RX 6600 LE edges ahead with an average benchmark score of 70,829 versus 69,870 for the Pro WX 8200, a 1.4% margin that places the RX 6600 LE at the 91st percentile of all GPUs while the Pro WX 8200 sits at the 90th. In head-to-head testing, each card claims one victory: the Pro WX 8200 wins Geekbench OpenCL by 0.8%, while the RX 6600 LE dominates Geekbench Vulkan by 4.9%. The choice between these two depends entirely on which API and workload profile matters more, as their architectural philosophies diverge sharply.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE leads with an average benchmark score of 70,829, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 69,870. This gives the RX 6600 LE a 1.4% advantage overall.

Q: How do the two cards compare in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 wins Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 69,774 versus 69,229 for the RX 6600 LE, a 0.8% margin. The Pro WX 8200 also posts a Geekbench Metal score of 70,759, which the RX 6600 LE does not have a recorded result for.

Q: Which GPU performs better in Vulkan workloads?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE is the clear winner in Geekbench Vulkan, scoring 72,428 against 69,076 for the Pro WX 8200. This represents a 4.9% advantage for the RX 6600 LE.

Q: What are the architectural differences between these two GPUs?

A: The RX 6600 LE uses the Navi 23 chip built on RDNA 2.0 architecture at a 7 nm process node, while the Pro WX 8200 uses the Vega 10 chip based on GCN 5.0 architecture at a 14 nm node. The RX 6600 LE has 28 ray tracing cores, whereas the Pro WX 8200 has none.

Q: How do their memory subsystems differ?

A: The RX 6600 LE features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Pro WX 8200 has 8 GB of HBM2 memory on a 2048-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Pro WX 8200's memory bandwidth is more than double that of the RX 6600 LE.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE is listed as Active production with a release date of December 7, 2023. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 is End-of-life, having been released on August 12, 2018.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE wins in Vulkan-based workloads. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 72,428 exceeds the Pro WX 8200's 69,076 by 4.9%, the largest performance gap between the two cards in any shared benchmark. This advantage likely stems from the RX 6600 LE's modern RDNA 2.0 architecture, which supports Vulkan 1.4 compared to Vulkan 1.3 on the Pro WX 8200, and its DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support versus the Pro WX 8200's DirectX 12 (12_1). The RX 6600 LE also carries hardware ray tracing cores — 28 of them — which the Pro WX 8200 lacks entirely, making it the better choice for any ray-traced or next-generation graphics API workload.

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 wins in OpenCL compute. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 69,774 tops the RX 6600 LE's 69,229 by 0.8%, a modest but consistent margin. The Pro WX 8200 also has a Geekbench Metal score of 70,759, a test the RX 6600 LE does not appear in, suggesting broader API coverage for Apple ecosystem workflows. The Pro WX 8200's massive 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, delivered via HBM2 on a 2048-bit bus, gives it a theoretical advantage in memory-bound compute tasks, even if its raw OpenCL score only slightly edges out the newer card. For legacy OpenCL compute pipelines or Metal-based applications, the Pro WX 8200 is the stronger option.

Architecture Differences

The RX 6600 LE is built on RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 23 chip, fabricated by TSMC at a 7 nm process node. This modern design packs 11,060 million transistors into a 237 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 46.7 million per mm². The Pro WX 8200, by contrast, uses GCN 5.0 architecture with the Vega 10 chip, manufactured by GlobalFoundries at a 14 nm node. It contains 12,500 million transistors spread across a much larger 495 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of just 25.3 million per mm². The RX 6600 LE's smaller, denser design reflects its newer manufacturing process and more efficient architecture.

The RX 6600 LE features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Pro WX 8200 doubles the shading units to 3,584 and TMUs to 224, while matching the RX 6600 LE with 64 ROPs. However, the Pro WX 8200 has no ray tracing cores. In terms of raw compute throughput, the Pro WX 8200 delivers 10.75 TFLOPS FP32 and 21.50 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), while the RX 6600 LE produces 8.942 TFLOPS FP32 and 17.88 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). Despite the Pro WX 8200's higher theoretical peak, the RX 6600 LE achieves higher pixel rate at 159.7 GPixel/s versus 96.00 GPixel/s, though the Pro WX 8200 leads in texture rate at 336.0 GTexel/s versus 279.4 GTexel/s.

The RX 6600 LE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the Pro WX 8200 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Both use dual-slot cooling, but the RX 6600 LE is significantly more compact at 190 mm length versus 267 mm for the Pro WX 8200. The RX 6600 LE also has a much lower TDP of 132 W with a 300 W suggested PSU, compared to 230 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU for the Pro WX 8200.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |

| Process Node | 7 nm (TSMC) | 14 nm (GlobalFoundries) |

| Transistors | 11,060 million | 12,500 million |

| Die Size | 237 mm² | 495 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 46.7M / mm² | 25.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1626 MHz | 1200 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz | 1500 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2045 MHz | — |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 2048 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 3584 |

| TMUs | 112 | 224 |

| RT Cores | 28 | — |

| Pixel Rate | 159.7 GPixel/s | 96.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 279.4 GTexel/s | 336.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 8.942 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 17.88 TFLOPS (2:1) | 21.50 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 132 W | 230 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | 190 mm x 110 mm x 40 mm | 267 mm x 111 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | December 7, 2023 | August 12, 2018 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two cards split their head-to-head benchmark results exactly, with each winning one test. In Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 69,774 against 69,229 for the RX 6600 LE, a 0.8% margin that favors the older workstation card. This result is notable because the Pro WX 8200 achieves this with a much higher TDP of 230 W and a larger die, yet the efficiency-focused RX 6600 LE comes within striking distance despite its 132 W TDP. The Pro WX 8200's advantage in this test likely comes from its 3,584 shading units and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, which provide raw parallel throughput that the RX 6600 LE's 1,792 shading units and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot fully match in OpenCL's compute model.

The RX 6600 LE strikes back decisively in Geekbench Vulkan, scoring 72,428 versus 69,076 for the Pro WX 8200. This 4.9% victory is the largest performance difference between the two cards in any shared benchmark and demonstrates the RX 6600 LE's architectural superiority in modern graphics APIs. The RX 6600 LE's support for Vulkan 1.4 and DirectX 12 Ultimate, combined with its 28 ray tracing cores, gives it features the Pro WX 8200 simply cannot access. The Pro WX 8200's Vulkan 1.3 and DirectX 12 (12_1) support limits its ability to leverage newer rendering techniques, and its lack of ray tracing hardware puts it at a structural disadvantage in Vulkan workloads that utilize these features.

Looking at the broader benchmark picture, the RX 6600 LE's average benchmark score of 70,829 places it 1.4% ahead of the Pro WX 8200's 69,870. The RX 6600 LE's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile (average score 70,140, just 1% behind) and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (average score 69,986, 1.2% behind), while the AMD Radeon RX 6650M sits 1.3% ahead. The Pro WX 8200's nearest rivals are nearly identical: the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 is 0.2% ahead, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 0.4% ahead, and the NVIDIA CMP 90HX trails by 1.3%. This clustering of scores within a 1.4% band across six different GPUs indicates that both AMD cards are performing at essentially the same tier, with the RX 6600 LE holding a slight edge.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE is the better overall GPU based on average benchmark score, winning by 1.4% with a 70,829 average versus 69,870 for the Pro WX 8200. It is also the clear choice for Vulkan-based applications, where its 4.9% lead is substantial, and it brings modern features like 28 ray tracing cores, DirectX 12 Ultimate, and Vulkan 1.4 support that the Pro WX 8200 lacks entirely. The RX 6600 LE achieves this while consuming only 132 W, running on a 300 W PSU, and fitting in a 190 mm dual-slot package — a stark contrast to the Pro WX 8200's 230 W TDP, 550 W PSU requirement, and 267 mm length. Its Active production status and December 2023 release date also mean it is currently available, whereas the Pro WX 8200 is End-of-life.

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 remains relevant only for specific legacy workloads. Its 0.8% OpenCL victory over the RX 6600 LE, coupled with its 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3,584 shading units, makes it a capable option for OpenCL compute pipelines that do not leverage modern graphics APIs. Its Geekbench Metal score of 70,759 also gives it a presence in Apple-centric workflows where the RX 6600 LE has no recorded result. However, its GCN 5.0 architecture lacks ray tracing, supports only DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.3, and its end-of-life status means it is no longer in production.

For most users, the RX 6600 LE is the superior purchase: it wins the average benchmark comparison, dominates in Vulkan, uses far less power, and offers modern features. The Pro WX 8200 should only be considered by those with specific OpenCL or Metal compute requirements that cannot be met by the RX 6600 LE, and who do not need Vulkan performance or ray tracing capabilities. The data is clear — the RX 6600 LE is the more balanced and future-proof choice.