AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 represent two vastly different eras of GPU design, and the benchmark data reflects a generational chasm rather than a close contest. While the Radeon Pro WX 7100 was a capable professional card in its day, the RTX 4070 Ti’s modern architecture delivers performance figures that are simply in another league. The data shows a decisive victory for the NVIDIA card across every shared benchmark, with the only remaining question being whether the older AMD card retains any niche relevance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are stark, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti winning both available comparisons by overwhelming margins. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 4070 Ti scores 176,953 against the Radeon Pro WX 7100’s 40,148, a delta of 340.8%. This is not a marginal improvement but a quadrupling of raw compute throughput, indicating that the NVIDIA card handles general-purpose GPU workloads with far greater efficiency.

The Vulkan API comparison is even more lopsided. The RTX 4070 Ti posts a score of 213,808, while the WX 7100 manages just 39,683. That equates to a 438.8% advantage for NVIDIA. Vulkan is often used in modern game engines and professional visualization tools, so this result suggests the RTX 4070 Ti will deliver a dramatically smoother experience in any application leveraging that API. The WX 7100’s score here is less than 20% of the NVIDIA card’s output, a gap that no driver optimization could hope to close.

Looking beyond the direct head-to-head, the average benchmark scores reinforce this narrative. The RTX 4070 Ti achieves an average benchmark score of 44,795, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45,152, just 0.8% higher) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45,384, 1.3% higher), showing it sits comfortably among modern high-end parts. The Radeon Pro WX 7100, by contrast, averages 40,063 and sits in the 82nd percentile, with its nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40,318, 0.6% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40,377, 0.8% higher).

The individual benchmark suite shows where each card’s strengths lie, though only the NVIDIA card has a full set of results. The RTX 4070 Ti excels in Passmark G3D with a score of 31,624, and its Passmark DirectX 11 score of 288 is notably higher than its DirectX 12 score of 116. The WX 7100 has no DirectX benchmark entries, but its Geekbench Metal score of 40,357 suggests it retains some utility in Apple-centric workflows. However, given that the RTX 4070 Ti’s OpenCL score is over four times higher, the AMD card’s Metal performance is unlikely to compensate for its overall deficit.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior GPU for virtually every workload measured. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks, holds a higher average benchmark score, and sits in a better percentile rank. Users seeking maximum compute performance, modern API support, or high-end gaming should choose the RTX 4070 Ti without hesitation. Its 438.8% lead in Vulkan and 340.8% lead in OpenCL are not incremental gains; they represent a complete generational overhaul in processing capability.

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100, however, is not without a theoretical audience. Its 130 W TDP and single-slot design make it a far more power-efficient and space-conscious option than the RTX 4070 Ti’s 285 W dual-slot footprint. For legacy systems with PCIe 3.0 slots or those requiring four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, the WX 7100 offers a specific connectivity profile that the RTX 4070 Ti (with one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a) does not match. Still, from a pure performance standpoint, the WX 7100’s 5.728 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is dwarfed by the RTX 4070 Ti’s 40.09 TFLOPS, making the older card a poor choice for any compute-intensive task.

Benchmark results indicate that the RTX 4070 Ti is the right pick for professionals running modern DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads, Vulkan-based renderers, or OpenCL compute. The WX 7100 should only be considered by users with strict power or physical constraints who prioritize its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory over the RTX 4070 Ti’s larger 12 GB GDDR6X pool. In any head-to-head scenario, the NVIDIA card wins decisively, and the data offers no scenario where the AMD card’s lower scores translate into a practical advantage.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is vast, explaining the performance gap. The RTX 4070 Ti is built on the AD104 chip using NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. This node packs 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die, yielding a density of 121.8M transistors per square millimeter. In contrast, the WX 7100 uses the Ellesmere chip based on AMD’s GCN 4.0 architecture, produced on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. That older node contains just 5,700 million transistors across a 232 mm² die, with a density of only 24.6M transistors per square millimeter.

The transistor count difference is staggering: the RTX 4070 Ti has over six times more transistors than the WX 7100, enabling features that simply do not exist on the older card. The RTX 4070 Ti includes 60 dedicated ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores, while the WX 7100 has none of either. This means the NVIDIA card can accelerate ray-traced rendering and AI-based workloads (such as DLSS) in hardware, while the AMD card must rely on brute-force shader computation. The RTX 4070 Ti also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the WX 7100 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3.

Memory architecture further separates the two. The RTX 4070 Ti uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, achieving 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The WX 7100 uses 8 GB of GDDR5 on a wider 256-bit bus but only reaches 224.0 GB/s. Despite the wider bus, the older memory type is far slower, resulting in less than half the bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti’s shading unit count of 7,680 dwarfs the WX 7100’s 2,304, and its 240 texture mapping units versus 144 further cement its compute advantage.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field, reflecting their different market positions and release eras. The RTX 4070 Ti has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, while the WX 7100 runs at 1188 MHz base and 1243 MHz boost. Even before architectural advantages, the NVIDIA card’s clocks are more than double the AMD card’s, contributing to its higher throughput.

Memory specifications show a clear divergence: the RTX 4070 Ti offers 12 GB of GDDR6X with a 192-bit bus and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the WX 7100 provides 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The effective memory clock also differs, with the RTX 4070 Ti running at 21 Gbps effective versus the WX 7100’s 7 Gbps. This bandwidth gap directly impacts texture-heavy workloads and large dataset processing.

The physical and power profiles are also distinct. The RTX 4070 Ti is a dual-slot card measuring 285 mm in length and 42 mm in width, requiring a 600 W power supply and a single 16-pin connector. Its TDP is 285 W. The WX 7100 is a single-slot card at 241 mm length and 112 mm height (width not specified), with a 130 W TDP and a single 6-pin connector, requiring a 300 W power supply. The RTX 4070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the WX 7100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which may impact bandwidth in older systems. Display outputs differ as well: the RTX 4070 Ti has one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a, while the WX 7100 offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 5.728 TFLOPS FP32, a difference of roughly seven times.

Q: Does the AMD card support ray tracing?

A: No. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 has no ray tracing cores, while the RTX 4070 Ti includes 60 dedicated RT cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti achieves 504.2 GB/s with 12 GB of GDDR6X, whereas the WX 7100 reaches 224.0 GB/s with 8 GB of GDDR5.

Q: Which card is more power-efficient?

A: The WX 7100 has a 130 W TDP compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 285 W TDP, making the AMD card more power-efficient despite its lower performance.

Q: Can the WX 7100 run modern DirectX 12 Ultimate games?

A: No. The WX 7100 supports DirectX 12 (12_0), while the RTX 4070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like ray tracing and mesh shaders.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of each card?

A: Both cards had a launch MSRP of 799 USD, though they target entirely different performance tiers.