AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A Comparison

# AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 and NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A occupy different corners of the GPU landscape, with the former being a workstation-oriented card from 2016 and the latter a mobile-focused chip from 2021. Benchmark data shows the AMD card winning both head-to-head tests, but the story is more nuanced when examining their respective positions within the broader GPU hierarchy. The WX 7100 achieves an average benchmark score of 40063, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, while the MX570 A scores 38691 on average, sitting in the 81st percentile. These are remarkably close overall positions, yet the specific workloads and contexts reveal meaningful distinctions.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 wins in both available benchmark comparisons, but the margin varies significantly by test. In OpenCL, the WX 7100 scores 40148 against the MX570 A's 39780, a narrow 0.9% advantage. The Vulkan test shows a more decisive gap, with the WX 7100 posting 39683 versus 37601 for the MX570 A, a 5.5% lead. This pattern suggests that the AMD card's advantage grows in API environments where it can more fully utilize its hardware resources.

However, the MX570 A is not without its own competitive positioning. Its average score of 38691 places it within 0.9% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38349) and exactly tied with the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (38706). The WX 7100, by comparison, sits 1.3% above the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39568) and AMD Radeon Pro 575 (39555), while being 0.8% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40377). The MX570 A's nearest rival list includes the standard GeForce MX570 at 38299, just 1% lower, indicating the "A" variant offers a modest but real performance uplift.

For use-case analysis, the WX 7100's 8 GB GDDR5 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth position it for larger workloads, while the MX570 A's 2 GB GDDR6 with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth suggests lighter tasks. The AMD card's 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs indicate multi-display professional setups, whereas the MX570 A's "Portable Device Dependent" outputs point to laptop integration. The data supports the WX 7100 for compute-heavy, multi-monitor workstation scenarios, while the MX570 A fits mobile, power-constrained environments.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 leads with an average score of 40063, compared to 38691 for the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A. This places the WX 7100 in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs versus the 81st percentile for the MX570 A.

Q: How large is the performance gap in OpenCL?

A: The WX 7100 scores 40148 in OpenCL, while the MX570 A scores 39780. This translates to a 0.9% advantage for the AMD card, which is a very narrow margin.

Q: What about Vulkan performance?

A: In Vulkan, the WX 7100 posts 39683 against 37601 for the MX570 A. The 5.5% delta is the largest head-to-head difference between the two cards.

Q: How does each card compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The WX 7100 is 1.3% faster than both the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39568) and AMD Radeon Pro 575 (39555), while the MX570 A matches the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (38706) exactly and sits 1% above the standard GeForce MX570 (38299).

Q: Which card has better memory specifications?

A: The WX 7100 offers 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth, providing less than half the bandwidth.

Q: Are both cards still in production?

A: No. Both the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 and NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A are listed as end-of-life products.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head comparison includes two tests: Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 wins both, but the margins tell different stories. In OpenCL, the WX 7100's 40148 score edges out the MX570 A's 39780 by just 0.9%. This near-tie suggests that in general-purpose compute workloads, the two cards are essentially equivalent despite their architectural and generational differences. The MX570 A's Ampere architecture and tensor cores (64) and ray tracing cores (16) do not provide an advantage in this particular OpenCL test.

The Vulkan result is more decisive. The WX 7100 scores 39683, which is 5.5% higher than the MX570 A's 37601. This 2082-point gap indicates that the AMD card's GCN 4.0 architecture handles Vulkan workloads more efficiently. The WX 7100's higher texture rate of 179.0 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s for the MX570 A likely contributes to this advantage, as does the AMD card's 2304 shading units compared to 2048 for NVIDIA. The MX570 A's lower pixel rate of 36.96 GPixel/s versus 39.78 GPixel/s for the WX 7100 further explains the Vulkan deficit.

Looking at the broader context, both cards perform near their rival clusters. The WX 7100's 40063 average sits between the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40318, -0.6%) and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39568, +1.3%). The MX570 A's 38691 average aligns closely with the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (38706, 0% delta) and the GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38349, +0.9%). These positions suggest that while the WX 7100 wins the direct comparison, both cards are competitive within their respective performance tiers.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ substantially across nearly every specification category. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses a 14 nm process from GlobalFoundries, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A uses an 8 nm process from Samsung. The WX 7100's chip, Ellesmere, contains 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 24.6M per mm². The MX570 A's GA107SB chip packs 8,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die, achieving 43.5M per mm² density.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The WX 7100 runs at 1188 MHz base and 1243 MHz boost, while the MX570 A operates at 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost. Memory clocks also diverge: the AMD card uses 1750 MHz (7 Gbps effective) GDDR5, whereas the NVIDIA card uses 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) GDDR6. The WX 7100's memory configuration of 8 GB on a 256-bit bus yields 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, versus 2 GB on a 64-bit bus for 96.00 GB/s on the MX570 A.

Compute resources show the AMD card with 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The MX570 A has 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The WX 7100 achieves 5.728 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1), while the MX570 A reaches 4.731 TFLOPS in both. Power consumption is dramatically different: 130 W TDP for the WX 7100 with a 300 W suggested PSU and 1x 6-pin connector, versus 25 W TDP for the MX570 A with no power connector and no suggested PSU.

The physical form factors also differ. The WX 7100 is single-slot, 241 mm (9.5 inches) long and 112 mm (4.4 inches) tall, with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The MX570 A is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with portable device-dependent outputs. Bus interfaces show the AMD card using PCIe 3.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is built on GCN 4.0 architecture, part of the Radeon Pro Polaris generation. This architecture supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A uses the Ampere architecture from the GeForce MX (5xx) generation, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The higher DirectX feature level and newer Vulkan version on the MX570 A indicate more modern API support.

The MX570 A includes 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores, features entirely absent from the WX 7100. These hardware units enable ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated workloads, though the benchmark data does not include tests that specifically leverage them. The WX 7100's FP16 performance runs at 1:1 ratio with FP32 (both 5.728 TFLOPS), while the MX570 A also offers 1:1 FP16 at 4.731 TFLOPS.

Process technology differences are stark: 14 nm versus 8 nm. This allows the MX570 A to pack 8,700 million transistors versus 5,700 million in the WX 7100, despite having a smaller die (200 mm² vs 232 mm²). The transistor density of 43.5M per mm² on the MX570 A more than doubles the 24.6M per mm² of the WX 7100. However, the WX 7100's larger memory bus and higher clock speeds compensate for the older process in raw bandwidth and compute throughput.

The release timeline shows the WX 7100 launching on November 9, 2016, with a listed launch MSRP of 799 USD. The MX570 A came later, on December 16, 2021, with no launch MSRP provided. The WX 7100 has a documented predecessor (Radeon Pro GCN) and successor (Radeon Pro Vega), while the MX570 A lists neither. Both are end-of-life products.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 in direct competition, winning both head-to-head tests with a combined 2-0 record. The Vulkan advantage of 5.5% is substantial, while the OpenCL margin of 0.9% is negligible. However, the choice between these two cards depends heavily on the intended use case and platform.

For desktop workstation users requiring multi-display output (4x DisplayPort 1.4a), large memory capacity (8 GB), high bandwidth (224.0 GB/s), and sustained compute performance (5.728 TFLOPS), the WX 7100 is the clear choice. Its 130 W TDP and single-slot design fit traditional workstation towers, and its 82nd percentile ranking places it above the MX570 A's 81st percentile. The AMD card's 3.5% average score advantage (40063 vs 38691) reflects its overall superiority in the tested workloads.

For mobile or compact systems where power efficiency is paramount, the MX570 A's 25 W TDP versus 130 W represents a 5.2x reduction in power draw. The NVIDIA card's 8 nm process, 64 tensor cores, and 16 ray tracing cores provide modern features absent from the older GCN architecture. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface offers newer connectivity, and its Vulkan 1.4 support exceeds the WX 7100's Vulkan 1.3. The MX570 A's 2 GB GDDR6 memory, while limited, operates at 12 Gbps effective, faster than the WX 7100's 7 Gbps GDDR5.

The data shows the WX 7100 winning on performance and professional features, while the MX570 A wins on efficiency and modern architectural features. The WX 7100's nearest rivals include the RTX 5070 (40377, -0.8%) and Radeon Pro 580 (40318, -0.6%), placing it in solid mid-range workstation territory. The MX570 A's rivals include the Radeon Pro 580X (38706, 0%) and RTX 5080 Mobile (38349, +0.9%), showing it performs competitively within its mobile segment. Users prioritizing raw compute and display flexibility should select the WX 7100; those needing an efficient, modern mobile GPU should consider the MX570 A.