AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon PRO W7900?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has an average benchmark score of 110,725, putting it in the 94th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any recorded benchmark results?

A: No. The database shows no benchmark entries for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, placing it in the 50th percentile.

Q: How do the memory configurations differ between the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 uses 48 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus with 864.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 delivers 61.32 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel fillrate?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has a pixel rate of 479.0 GPixel/s, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s.

Q: What PCIe interface do both cards use?

A: Both the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO use the PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip, codenamed Plum Bonito. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a different architecture called TrueGPU, based on the 7G105 chip from the 7G100 generation.

The manufacturing processes differ. The AMD card uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Lisuan Tech card uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The AMD card contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded transistor count, die size, or transistor density in the database.

Both cards feature 6,144 shading units. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has 384 texture mapping units and 192 raster operation pipelines. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs. The AMD card includes 96 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded ray tracing core count.

The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech card also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but only Vulkan 1.3. The display outputs also differ: the AMD card provides 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, while the Lisuan Tech card provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

FP16 compute shows a notable architectural divergence. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 delivers FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, both at 61.32 TFLOPS. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, achieving 49.15 TFLOPS against 24.58 TFLOPS FP32.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The wins counter shows 0 for each side. However, the AMD card has two recorded benchmark scores: 84,379 in Geekbench OpenCL and 137,070 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in any test.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900's average benchmark score of 110,725 places it in the 94th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database provide context. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega II scores 109,617, which is 1% lower. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 113,944, which is 2.8% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600X scores 107,342, which is 3.2% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB scores 114,395, which is 3.2% higher.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no nearest rivals recorded and no benchmark scores. Its percentile of 50 with an average score of 0 reflects the absence of measurement data rather than a performance verdict.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and Lisuan Tech LX PRO differ across several specification fields.

Process node: 5 nm for AMD, 6 nm for Lisuan Tech.

Transistors: 57,700 million for AMD, unknown for Lisuan Tech.

Die size: 529 mm² for AMD, unknown for Lisuan Tech.

Memory size: 48 GB for AMD, 24 GB for Lisuan Tech.

Memory bus width: 384 bit for AMD, 192 bit for Lisuan Tech.

Memory bandwidth: 864.0 GB/s for AMD, 432.0 GB/s for Lisuan Tech.

TMUs: 384 for AMD, 192 for Lisuan Tech.

ROPs: 192 for AMD, 96 for Lisuan Tech.

Ray tracing cores: 96 for AMD, none recorded for Lisuan Tech.

Pixel rate: 479.0 GPixel/s for AMD, 192.0 GPixel/s for Lisuan Tech.

Texture rate: 958.1 GTexel/s for AMD, 384.0 GTexel/s for Lisuan Tech.

FP32 compute: 61.32 TFLOPS for AMD, 24.58 TFLOPS for Lisuan Tech.

FP16 compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (1:1) for AMD, 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for Lisuan Tech.

TDP: 295 W for AMD, 225 W for Lisuan Tech.

Slot width: Triple-slot for AMD, dual-slot for Lisuan Tech.

Power connectors: 2x 8-pin for AMD, 1x 16-pin for Lisuan Tech.

Suggested PSU: 600 W for AMD, 550 W for Lisuan Tech.

Vulkan version: 1.4 for AMD, 1.3 for Lisuan Tech.

Display outputs: 3x DisplayPort 2.1 plus 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD, 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for Lisuan Tech.

Dimensions: 280 mm length, 110 mm height, 51 mm width for AMD; 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width for Lisuan Tech.

Release date: 2023-05-25 for AMD, 2026-03-16 for Lisuan Tech.

Launch MSRP: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has a launch MSRP of 3,999 USD. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded launch MSRP.

Production status: Both cards are listed as Active.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 wins on raw compute throughput in every measured category. Its FP32 figure of 61.32 TFLOPS is 2.5 times the 24.58 TFLOPS of the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The texture rate of 958.1 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 479.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s show a similar margin. The AMD card carries double the memory capacity at 48 GB versus 24 GB, double the bus width at 384 bit versus 192 bit, and double the bandwidth at 864.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

The AMD card also has 96 ray tracing cores, a feature the Lisuan Tech LX PRO does not list. The AMD card supports Vulkan 1.4, one version ahead of the Lisuan Tech's Vulkan 1.3. DisplayPort 2.1 outputs on the AMD card provide a newer display standard than the DisplayPort 1.4a on the Lisuan Tech card.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on physical efficiency and power requirements. Its TDP of 225 W is 70 W lower than the AMD card's 295 W. The suggested PSU of 550 W is lower than the 600 W suggested for the AMD card. The Lisuan Tech card uses a dual-slot cooler design versus the AMD card's triple-slot design, and its dimensions of 248 mm length and 48 mm width make it shorter and narrower than the AMD card's 280 mm length and 51 mm width. The Lisuan Tech card is taller at 118 mm versus 110 mm, but the overall footprint favors the Lisuan Tech for compact installations.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO also delivers competitive FP16 throughput. Its 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio represents 80% of the AMD card's FP16 output despite much lower FP32 performance, which may indicate a different compute priority in the TrueGPU architecture.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has benchmark data confirming its performance tier. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,379 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 137,070 place it in the 94th percentile. Its nearest rivals cluster within a narrow band: the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II at 1% lower, the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile at 2.8% higher, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600X at 3.2% lower, and the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB at 3.2% higher. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no measurement data to establish a comparable performance position.

The database shows the AMD card as the established performer with verified results. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO remains unmeasured, so its wins are limited to the physical and power characteristics recorded in its specification sheet.