GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 48 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2495 MHz
TDP 295 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
84,379
22,844
geekbench_vulkan
137,070
22,237

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

For this graphics card matchup, Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 demonstrates its advantage clearly. Whether you're streaming at high resolutions, Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 reliably surpasses NVIDIA RTX A400 by substantial gaps. This benchmark margin expands even larger at higher settings. This GPU manages heavy titles with ease. Its architectural benefits are apparent.

Game performance results over various games reliably advantage Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900. From esports titles to blockbuster titles, Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 preserves its edge. This performance dependability in various workloads shows underlying engineering superiority. Enthusiasts might count on strong results irrespective of genre. The versatility is remarkable.

NVIDIA RTX A400 struggles to keep up with Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900's pure power. For cost-sensitive users, NVIDIA RTX A400 can still represent sufficient capability, however people needing top-tier experience should lean toward Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900. This performance difference is significantly substantial to ignore. Heavy workloads specifically highlight this gap. This price gap returns benefits in capability.

NVIDIA RTX A400 isn't written off entirely, yet the gaming shortfall against Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is difficult to deny. For cost-sensitive buyers, NVIDIA RTX A400 may nevertheless offer a choice if its lower cost compensates for its reduced performance. But, when peak visual throughput, Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 remains the obvious winner. The assessment is evident. Power hunters would lean toward Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO W7900
RTX A400
Core Specs
Shading Units
6,144
768 -87.5%
Shaders
6,144
768 -87.5%
TMUs
384
24 -93.8%
ROPs
192
16 -91.7%
Compute Units
96
SM Count
6
Clocks
Base Clock
1855 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
48 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
49,152
4,096 -91.7%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
384 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
864.0 GB/s
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
2 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
61.32 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.916 TFLOPS (1:32)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
122.6 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
96
6 -93.8%
Tensor Cores
24
Matrix Cores
192
Power
TDP
295 W
50 W
TDP (W)
295
50 -83.1%
Suggested PSU
600 W
250 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 31
GA107
Codename
Plum Bonito
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
8,700 million
Die Size
529 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
109.1M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Triple-slot
Single-slot
Length
280 mm 11 inches
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
3,999 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon PRO W7900 Details View RTX A400 Details