GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 48 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2495 MHz
TDP 295 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A1000

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1462 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
84,379
52,078
geekbench_vulkan
137,070
49,574
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
969

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

If analyzing AMD Radeon PRO W7900 with NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000, the frame rate difference gets clearly visible. AMD Radeon PRO W7900 secures the crown in virtually most benchmark we ran. This delta is considerable enough to affect practical gaming performance. Enthusiasts should notice enhanced frame rates. The assessment is obvious.

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 has difficulty to rival AMD Radeon PRO W7900's sheer throughput. In budget buyers, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 may still deliver adequate results, but buyers wanting top-tier performance might invest toward AMD Radeon PRO W7900. The performance margin is sufficiently notable to dismiss. Heavy games particularly highlight this difference. The price gap pays rewards in capability.

This memory superiority of AMD Radeon PRO W7900 grows more critical at higher settings. High resolution scenarios needs substantial memory, and AMD Radeon PRO W7900 provides additional headroom. This leads into improved experiences in heavy titles. Modern games might only consume additional graphics memory. The benefit expands over time.

For people weighing a investment selection, AMD Radeon PRO W7900 comes out as the recommended option. Its consistent benchmark lead over NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 establishes it the wiser choice for enthusiast users. Factor in your individual needs, however the benchmarks directs toward AMD Radeon PRO W7900. Reach an wise selection. This gaming gap is real and meaningful.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO W7900
RTX A1000
Core Specs
Shading Units
6,144
2,304 -62.5%
Shaders
6,144
2,304 -62.5%
TMUs
384
72 -81.3%
ROPs
192
32 -83.3%
Compute Units
96
SM Count
18
Clocks
Base Clock
1760 MHz
727 MHz
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1462 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
48 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
49,152
8,192 -83.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
384 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
864.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
2 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
46.78 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
61.32 TFLOPS
6.737 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.916 TFLOPS (1:32)
105.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
61.32 TFLOPS (1:1)
6.737 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
96
18 -81.3%
Tensor Cores
72
Matrix Cores
192
Power
TDP
295 W
50 W
TDP (W)
295
50 -83.1%
Suggested PSU
600 W
250 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 31
GA107
Codename
Plum Bonito
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
8,700 million
Die Size
529 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
109.1M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Triple-slot
Single-slot
Length
280 mm 11 inches
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
3,999 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon PRO W7900 Details View RTX A1000 Details