AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparison between the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Each card is measured against its own set of nearest rivals, using different test suites, so a side-by-side score comparison is not possible from the available data.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 delivers an average benchmark score of 110,725 across its two recorded tests: Geekbench OpenCL at 84,379 and Geekbench Vulkan at 137,070. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5, producing an average of 6,270. These are different workloads, and the numeric gap reflects the test type, not a direct performance ranking.

The AMD card sits in the 94th percentile against all GPUs, while the NVIDIA card sits in the 36th percentile. That percentile spread shows that the Radeon PRO W7900 is positioned among the top tier of all recorded graphics hardware, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupies a more mid-range position in the broader database.

For the AMD Radeon PRO W7900, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II (average score 109,617, delta 1%), the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile (113,944, delta -2.8%), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600X (107,342, delta 3.2%), and the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (114,395, delta -3.2%). The data shows the W7900 is effectively tied with the Pro Vega II, 1% ahead, and trails the RTX A5500 Mobile and Tesla V100 SXM2 by 2.8% and 3.2%, respectively. It leads the W6600X by 3.2%.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (6,270, delta 0%), the NVIDIA Quadro K620 (6,282, delta -0.2%), the AMD FirePro W600 (6,223, delta 0.8%), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 (6,327, delta -0.9%). The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is statistically tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, 0.8% ahead of the FirePro W600, and 0.9% behind the Radeon R7 M350 in this specific test.

The absence of any head-to-head test entries means the database does not currently support a direct claim of superiority for either card. The wins counter shows zero for both sides. The analysis must therefore rely on the individual benchmark profiles and the architectural and specification differences recorded for each product.

The Verdict

The data does not provide a single winner. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER are recorded in different performance tiers and different test categories. The W7900 achieves a 94th percentile rank across all GPUs, with an average score of 110,725 from OpenCL and Vulkan tests. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves a 36th percentile rank, with an average score of 6,270 from a single DX12 test.

From the recorded data, the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is the higher-performing product relative to the entire GPU database. Its percentile placement and its average score, even accounting for the different test types, indicate a substantially stronger compute profile. The NVIDIA card, by contrast, sits in a lower percentile and its nearest rivals are older, lower-end models such as the Quadro K620 and FirePro W600, which suggests its recorded score is not representative of a high-end compute workload.

However, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a newer design, released on 2025-12-31, while the W7900 was released on 2025-05-25? No, that is incorrect. The W7900 release date is 2023-05-25. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is newer by over two years. The newer card uses a different test suite, so direct comparison is not possible.

The database verdict is clear: for users requiring the compute performance reflected in OpenCL and Vulkan benchmarks, the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is the choice. For users targeting DX12 workloads as measured by Steel Nomad, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only product with recorded data. No cross-validated conclusion can be drawn beyond that.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 uses the Navi 31 chip, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Plum Bonito. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation. The process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 109.1 million per mm².

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It belongs to the GeForce 50-series generation. The process node is also 5 nm at TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm².

The AMD chip has a lower transistor density but a larger die and more total transistors. The NVIDIA chip has higher density but fewer total transistors. The AMD card has 6,144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, 192 render output units, and 96 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card has 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores.

The shading unit count favors NVIDIA, but the texture mapping units and render output units favor AMD. The AMD card has more ray tracing cores by count, but the NVIDIA card has dedicated tensor cores, which the AMD card does not record. The AMD card reports no tensor core field, meaning it likely lacks a dedicated tensor core array.

The API support is identical for both: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface differs: the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 864.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Despite the smaller bus width, the NVIDIA card has higher memory bandwidth due to the faster memory clock: 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the AMD card.

Clock speeds differ. The AMD card has a base clock of 1760 MHz and a boost clock of 2495 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a higher base clock but a lower boost clock.

The AMD card delivers 61.32 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The NVIDIA card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The AMD card has higher compute throughput. Pixel rate favors AMD at 479.0 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate also favors AMD at 958.1 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s.

Power draw differs: the AMD card has a TDP of 295 W, while the NVIDIA card has a TDP of 350 W. The AMD card is triple-slot with 2x 8-pin power connectors and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot with 1x 16-pin power connector and no suggested PSU listed. Physical dimensions: the AMD card is 280 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 51 mm wide. The NVIDIA card is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 48 mm wide.

Display outputs: the AMD card has 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1. The NVIDIA card has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The launch MSRP for the AMD card is 3,999 USD. The launch MSRP for the NVIDIA card is 749 USD.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 delivers 61.32 TFLOPS FP32, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32. The AMD card is 17.38 TFLOPS ahead.

Q: Which card has more memory capacity?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. The AMD card has three times the capacity.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is higher than the AMD Radeon PRO W7900's 864.0 GB/s, despite the AMD card using a wider 384-bit bus.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel rate?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has a pixel rate of 479.0 GPixel/s, which is more than double the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 235.4 GPixel/s.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm², higher than the AMD Radeon PRO W7900's 109.1 million per mm².

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8,960 shading units, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has 6,144 shading units. The NVIDIA card has 2,816 more.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 wins on raw compute throughput. It has higher FP32 and FP16 TFLOPS (61.32 versus 43.94), higher pixel rate (479.0 versus 235.4 GPixel/s), higher texture rate (958.1 versus 686.6 GTexel/s), and more memory capacity (48 GB versus 16 GB). It also has more texture mapping units (384 versus 280) and more render output units (192 versus 96).

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on memory bandwidth (896.0 versus 864.0 GB/s), memory type (GDDR7 versus GDDR6), shading unit count (8,960 versus 6,144), and tensor core availability (280 tensor cores versus none recorded). It also has a newer PCIe interface (5.0 versus 4.0) and a higher base clock (2295 MHz versus 1760 MHz).

The AMD card is heavier and larger, with a triple-slot design and a 600 W suggested PSU. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot with a single 16-pin connector. The AMD card has more display outputs in total (4 versus 4, but includes a mini-DisplayPort). The NVIDIA card includes an HDMI port, which the AMD card lacks.

For compute-heavy workloads such as OpenCL and Vulkan rendering, the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is the stronger product according to the data. Its 94th percentile rank and higher average score confirm this. For DX12 workloads as measured by 3DMark Steel Nomad, the NVIDIA card has the only recorded score, but its 36th percentile rank and its nearest rivals (Quadro K620, FirePro W600) suggest a lower overall standing in the database.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on efficiency of design: higher transistor density, smaller die, and lower launch MSRP (749 USD versus 3,999 USD). The Radeon PRO W7900 wins on absolute capability: more memory, more compute, and higher pixel throughput. The recorded data supports the AMD card as the high-end compute solution and the NVIDIA card as a mid-range modern consumer GPU.