GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

CORE STATE Navi 31

VRAM 48 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2495 MHz

TDP 295 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

GPU

Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

84,379

98,554

geekbench_vulkan

137,070

85,631

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

2,612

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

181

passmark_g2d

N/A

732

passmark_g3d

N/A

12,534

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

5,368

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Arc A750

Examining the test data for the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 card from AMD and Arc A750 (Intel), an obvious story appears. the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 card from AMD reliably provides higher FPS in our testing. The benchmark superiority varies from substantial to remarkable based on the given benchmark. This reliability speaks to inherent design improvements. Consumers prioritizing rendering throughput would consider this.

When it comes to hardware ray tracing, the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 card from AMD jumps even more in front of Arc A750 (Intel). Its hardware cores execute demanding lighting calculations significantly more efficiently. Users wanting modern effects would certainly favor the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 card from AMD. The real-time ray tracing superiority is considerable. Modern games continually use real-time ray tracing features.

At the end of the day: the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 card from AMD wins this showdown convincingly. Buyers wanting gaming throughput would strongly favor the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 card from AMD over Arc A750 (Intel). The benchmark numbers demonstrates this assessment. The workloads should perform substantially faster. This is a straightforward victor in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO W7900

A750

Core Specs

Shading Units

6,144

3,584 -41.7%

Shaders

6,144

3,584 -41.7%

TMUs

384

224 -41.7%

ROPs

192

112 -41.7%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

448

Clocks

Base Clock

1855 MHz

2050 MHz

Boost Clock

2495 MHz

2400 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

48 GB

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

49,152

8,192 -83.3%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

384 bit

256 bit

Bandwidth

864.0 GB/s

512.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

6 MB

16 MB

L3 Cache

96 MB

—

L0 Cache

64 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

479.0 GPixel/s

268.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

958.1 GTexel/s

537.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

61.32 TFLOPS

17.20 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1.916 TFLOPS (1:32)

2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

122.6 TFLOPS (2:1)

34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

28 -70.8%

XMX Cores

—

448

Matrix Cores

192

—

Power

TDP

295 W

225 W

TDP (W)

295

225 -23.7%

Suggested PSU

600 W

550 W

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 31

DG2-512

Codename

Plum Bonito

—

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)

Alchemist (Arc 7)

Process Size

5 nm

6 nm

Transistors

57,700 million

21,700 million

Die Size

529 mm²

406 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

109.1M / mm²

53.4M / mm²

AMD MCM

GCD Transistors

45,400 million

—

GCD Die Size

304.35 mm²

—

MCD Transistors

2,050 million x6

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

Triple-slot

Dual-slot

Length

280 mm 11 inches

—

Height

110 mm 4.3 inches

—

Outputs

3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

3,999 USD

289 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

Xe Graphics

Successor

—

Battlemage

View Radeon PRO W7900 Details View Arc A750 Details