GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7800

CORE STATE Navi 31

VRAM 32 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2525 MHz

TDP 260 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

T400

CORE STATE TU117

VRAM 2 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Turing

PROCESS 12 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

154,366

17,039

geekbench_vulkan

175,422

15,976

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA T400

In this graphics card matchup, GeForce AMD Radeon PRO W7800 establishes its leadership obviously. Whether you're creating content at 1080p, GeForce AMD Radeon PRO W7800 consistently beats Radeon NVIDIA T400 by considerable gaps. The performance margin expands particularly larger at higher settings. This graphics card processes heavy workloads with ease. The technical improvements are obvious.

Radeon NVIDIA T400 cannot be written off completely, though its gaming gap compared to GeForce AMD Radeon PRO W7800 is tough to dismiss. For cost-sensitive builders, Radeon NVIDIA T400 may nevertheless offer an option provided its smaller price makes up for the reduced performance. However, for peak gaming power, GeForce AMD Radeon PRO W7800 represents the undisputed champion. This assessment is straightforward. Performance hunters should lean toward GeForce AMD Radeon PRO W7800.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO W7800

T400

Core Specs

Shading Units

4,480

384 -91.4%

Shaders

4,480

384 -91.4%

TMUs

280

24 -91.4%

ROPs

128

16 -87.5%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1895 MHz

420 MHz

Boost Clock

2525 MHz

1425 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

32 GB

2 GB

VRAM (MB)

32,768

2,048 -93.8%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

256 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

80.00 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

64 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

6 MB

1024 KB

L3 Cache

64 MB

—

L0 Cache

64 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

323.2 GPixel/s

22.80 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

707.0 GTexel/s

34.20 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

45.25 TFLOPS

1,094.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1,414.0 GFLOPS (1:32)

34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

90.50 TFLOPS (2:1)

2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Matrix Cores

140

—

Power

TDP

260 W

30 W

TDP (W)

260

30 -88.5%

Suggested PSU

600 W

200 W

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

None

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Turing

GPU Name

Navi 31

TU117

Codename

Plum Bonito

—

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)

Quadro Turing (Tx000)

Process Size

5 nm

12 nm

Transistors

57,700 million

4,700 million

Die Size

529 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

109.1M / mm²

23.5M / mm²

AMD MCM

GCD Transistors

45,400 million

—

GCD Die Size

304.35 mm²

—

MCD Transistors

2,050 million x6

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

CUDA

—

7.5

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Single-slot

Length

280 mm 11 inches

—

Height

110 mm 4.3 inches

—

Outputs

3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

2,499 USD

—

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

Quadro Volta

Successor

—

Workstation Ampere

View Radeon PRO W7800 Details View T400 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7800

T400

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA T400

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons