AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7800

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2525 MHz
TDP 260 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1447 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
154,366
143,870
geekbench_vulkan
175,422
139,213
passmark_directx_10
N/A
151
passmark_directx_11
N/A
237
passmark_directx_12
N/A
102
passmark_directx_9
N/A
259
passmark_g2d
N/A
981
passmark_g3d
N/A
24,004
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
10,101

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear advantage for the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 across the shared benchmark suite. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the W7800 scores 154366 against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 143870, a 7.3% lead. The gap widens considerably in Geekbench Vulkan, where the W7800 posts 175422 versus 139213 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, a 26% advantage. These are the only two tests where both cards have directly comparable results, and the AMD part wins both.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile brings additional benchmark data that the W7800 lacks, including Passmark tests. Its Passmark G3D score is 24004, its GPU compute score is 10101, and its DirectX 11 score is 237. The DirectX 10 score is 151, DirectX 9 is 259, DirectX 12 is 102, and the G2D score is 981. These results cannot be compared directly to the W7800, as no corresponding Passmark scores exist for the AMD card in this database.

The average benchmark scores paint a different picture depending on which tests are included. The W7800 has an average benchmark score of 164894, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile averages 35435. This massive difference is driven by the fact that the AMD card's average is based solely on its two Geekbench results, while the NVIDIA mobile part's average includes its nine Passmark scores, which are weighted toward lower-value tests. The percentile rankings reflect the same divergence: the W7800 sits at the 97th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits at the 80th percentile.

Rival comparisons reinforce the W7800's standing. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A5500 with an average score of 165217 and a delta of -0.2%, the NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation at 166094 (-0.7%), the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB at 162504 (1.5%), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X at 168574 (-2.2%). The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 at 35520 (-0.2%), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo at 35860 (-1.2%), the NVIDIA A2 at 34690 (2.1%), and the NVIDIA T1000 at 36289 (-2.4%). These groupings show the two cards competing in entirely different performance tiers.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 uses the Navi 31 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Plum Bonito. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture and belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. Both chips are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, but the transistor counts differ substantially. The W7800 packs 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, with a higher density of 118.3M per mm².

The memory subsystems are entirely different. The W7800 uses 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192 bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s. Despite having less than half the memory capacity and a narrower bus, the mobile NVIDIA part achieves higher memory bandwidth thanks to its faster 28 Gbps effective memory clock versus 18 Gbps effective on the AMD card.

Compute resources also diverge sharply. The W7800 has 4480 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 128 ROPs, and 70 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The AMD card has no tensor cores listed, while the NVIDIA part dedicates a large block to them. The FP32 throughput reflects the AMD card's workstation focus: 45.25 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 90.50 TFLOPS on the W7800 with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile manages 17.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Clock speeds tell the opposite story. The W7800 runs at a base clock of 1895 MHz and boosts to 2525 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base of 847 MHz and a boost of 1447 MHz, far lower clocks but with a much lower power envelope. The pixel rate is 323.2 GPixel/s on the W7800 versus 115.8 GPixel/s on the mobile part. Texture rate is 707.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 averages 164894, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile averages 35435. The W7800 sits at the 97th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the 80th percentile for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

Q: How much faster is the W7800 in Geekbench Vulkan?

A: The W7800 scores 175422 versus 139213 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, a 26% advantage. This is the largest recorded performance gap between the two in any shared test.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile have any benchmark wins over the W7800?

A: No. In the two shared benchmarks, Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan, the W7800 wins both. The win count is 2 for the AMD card and 0 for the NVIDIA card.

Q: What memory does each card use?

A: The W7800 uses 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192 bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power and cooling requirements for each?

A: The W7800 has a TDP of 260 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, and suggests a 600 W power supply. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W, is an integrated graphics package with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, while the W7800 has 4480. Despite fewer shading units, the W7800 delivers higher FP32 throughput at 45.25 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every major specification category. The W7800 uses the Navi 31 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Plum Bonito codename. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses GB205 with Blackwell 2.0 architecture and no codename listed. Both are on a 5 nm TSMC process, but the W7800 has 57,700 million transistors versus 31,100 million for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Die size is 529 mm² versus 263 mm², with transistor densities of 109.1M and 118.3M per mm² respectively.

Memory capacity is 32 GB of GDDR6 for the W7800 versus 12 GB of GDDR7 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Bus widths are 256 bit and 192 bit. Bandwidth favors the mobile part at 672.0 GB/s versus 576.0 GB/s. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the AMD card and 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the NVIDIA card.

Shader resources are split: 4480 shading units, 280 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 70 RT cores for the W7800; 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. The W7800 has no tensor cores listed. FP32 is 45.25 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 90.50 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1).

Pixel rates are 323.2 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 707.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s. The W7800 runs at 1895 MHz base and 2525 MHz boost, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile runs at 847 MHz base and 1447 MHz boost. TDP is 260 W versus 60 W. The W7800 is a dual-slot card with 2x 8-pin connectors and a 600 W suggested PSU; the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an integrated graphics package with no connectors and no PSU suggestion. The W7800 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The W7800 has 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's display outputs are portable device dependent. The W7800 measures 280 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width; the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has no dimensions listed. The W7800 launched on 2023-04-12 with a launch MSRP of 2,499 USD. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile launched on 2025-02-28 with no launch MSRP listed. The W7800's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile. Both are active production parts.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 wins in raw compute throughput and workstation-oriented capabilities. Its FP32 performance of 45.25 TFLOPS more than doubles the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is even more lopsided: 90.50 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS. The W7800 also delivers substantially higher pixel and texture rates, 323.2 GPixel/s and 707.0 GTexel/s respectively, against 115.8 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s. The 32 GB memory capacity is more than double the mobile part's 12 GB, which matters for large datasets and high-resolution textures. The W7800 has more TMUs, more ROPs, and more RT cores than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. It also leads in both shared Geekbench tests, with a 7.3% OpenCL advantage and a 26% Vulkan advantage. The W7800 occupies the 97th percentile of all GPUs, placing it among the top tier of recorded hardware.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in efficiency and specific architectural features. Its 60 W TDP is dramatically lower than the W7800's 260 W, making it suitable for portable devices where power draw is constrained. It has more shading units at 5888 versus 4480 and includes 184 tensor cores, which the W7800 lacks entirely. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile achieves higher memory bandwidth at 672.0 GB/s despite a narrower 192 bit bus, thanks to GDDR7 memory running at 28 Gbps effective. Its transistor density is higher at 118.3M per mm² versus 109.1M per mm², and it uses PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16 on the W7800. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also has newer release timing, launching in 2025-02-28 compared to the W7800's 2023-04-12.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs built for different environments. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 is a desktop workstation card with a 260 W TDP, 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, and FP32 throughput of 45.25 TFLOPS. It wins every shared benchmark against the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, with leads of 7.3% in Geekbench OpenCL and 26% in Geekbench Vulkan. Its 97th percentile ranking and average score of 164894 place it alongside professional GPUs like the NVIDIA RTX A5500, which scores 165217, and the RTX 4500 Ada Generation at 166094. The W7800 is the choice for compute-heavy workloads that need maximum FP32 and FP16 throughput, large memory capacity, and high pixel and texture rates. Its launch MSRP of 2,499 USD reflects its workstation positioning.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a mobile part with a 60 W TDP and an integrated graphics package. It delivers 17.04 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, 12 GB of GDDR7 memory, and 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 5888 shading units and 184 tensor cores give it a different compute profile than the W7800, though its FP32 throughput is less than half. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's average score of 35435 and 80th percentile ranking place it in a lower performance class, near the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 at 35520 and the AMD Radeon Pro Duo at 35860. It suits portable systems where the 60 W power envelope is a hard constraint and where tensor core support is required. The W7800 is the stronger performer in every directly comparable metric, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only viable option for battery-powered devices.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO W7800
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,480
5,888 +31.4%
Shaders
4,480
5,888 +31.4%
TMUs
280
184 -34.3%
ROPs
128
80 -37.5%
Compute Units
70
—
SM Count
—
46
Clocks
Base Clock
1895 MHz
847 MHz
Boost Clock
2525 MHz
1447 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
32 GB
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
12,288 -62.5%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
256 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
48 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
—
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
323.2 GPixel/s
115.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
707.0 GTexel/s
266.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
45.25 TFLOPS
17.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,414.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
266.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
90.50 TFLOPS (2:1)
17.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
70
46 -34.3%
Tensor Cores
—
184
Matrix Cores
140
—
Power
TDP
260 W
60 W
TDP (W)
260
60 -76.9%
Suggested PSU
600 W
—
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Navi 31
GB205
Codename
Plum Bonito
—
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
31,100 million
Die Size
529 mm²
263 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
109.1M / mm²
118.3M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
—
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
—
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
—
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
280 mm 11 inches
—
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
—
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
2,499 USD
—
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
GeForce 40 Mobile
View Radeon PRO W7800 Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Details