AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits the two cards into distinct roles. AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is the measured performer, with an average benchmark score of 118,976 across Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests. Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of zero, and a percentile rank of 50 versus the W7700's 95th percentile. For any workload that relies on compute throughput, the W7700 is the only one of the two with data showing it can finish the job.

The LX PRO wins on memory capacity. It carries 24 GB of GDDR6, which is 8 GB more than the W7700's 16 GB. For datasets that exceed 16 GB, the LX PRO is the only option that can hold the entire working set in video memory. The W7700 counters with a 256-bit bus and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the LX PRO uses a 192-bit bus and delivers 432.0 GB/s. The W7700 moves data 33.3% faster per second, but the LX PRO holds more of it.

Compute throughput favors the W7700 decisively. The AMD card reaches 31.95 TFLOPS FP32 and 63.90 TFLOPS FP16, while the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16. The W7700 leads by 7.37 TFLOPS in FP32 and 14.75 TFLOPS in FP16. Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern: W7700 hits 249.6 GPixel/s and 499.2 GTexel/s, versus 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX PRO.

The LX PRO does have the newer release date, listed as 2026-03-16, while the W7700 launched on 2023-11-12. The LX PRO also has an active production status, whereas the W7700 has no status listed. For buyers seeking current availability, that distinction matters. But for measured performance, the W7700 is the only card with any benchmark results in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has an average benchmark score of 118,976, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmarks and an average score of 0.

Q: How much memory does each card provide?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The W7700 delivers 576.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus. The LX PRO delivers 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus. The W7700 has a 144.0 GB/s bandwidth advantage.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The W7700 reaches 31.95 TFLOPS FP32. The LX PRO reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The W7700 leads by 7.37 TFLOPS.

Q: Do both cards support the same API versions?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The W7700 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power connector requirements?

A: The W7700 uses a single 8-pin connector with a suggested 450 W power supply. The LX PRO uses a single 16-pin connector with a suggested 550 W power supply.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two cards. The W7700 has two recorded benchmark scores: 108,245 in Geekbench OpenCL and 129,706 in Geekbench Vulkan. The LX PRO has zero recorded benchmarks in any test.

The absence of LX PRO results makes a direct comparison impossible, but the W7700's average score of 118,976 positions it against known rivals. The nearest rival is NVIDIA GB10 with an average score of 117,393, which is 1.3% behind the W7700. NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 117,088, 1.6% behind. NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB scores 114,395, 4.0% behind. NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 113,944, 4.4% behind.

The W7700's percentile rank of 95 versus all GPUs means it sits above the vast majority of recorded graphics cards. The LX PRO's percentile rank of 50 with no scores suggests it falls at the median of the database, but that rank carries no measured evidence. The data shows a clear gap: one card has verified performance, the other does not.

The biggest wins for the W7700 come from its compute rates. Its FP32 throughput of 31.95 TFLOPS exceeds the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS by 30.0%. Its FP16 throughput of 63.90 TFLOPS exceeds the LX PRO's 49.15 TFLOPS by 30.0% as well. Pixel rate favors the W7700 at 249.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a 30.0% lead. Texture rate also favors the W7700 at 499.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, again a 30.0% margin.

The LX PRO's only clear win in the recorded data is memory capacity. Its 24 GB total is 50.0% larger than the W7700's 16 GB. The LX PRO also has a higher TDP at 225 W versus 190 W, and it requires a 16-pin power connector versus the W7700's 8-pin. The LX PRO's dimensions are slightly larger: 248 mm length and 118 mm height versus 241 mm and 111 mm for the W7700. The LX PRO also adds a width dimension of 48 mm, while the W7700's width is not recorded.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification category. Memory size differs: 16 GB on the W7700 versus 24 GB on the LX PRO. Memory bus width differs: 256-bit on the W7700 versus 192-bit on the LX PRO. Memory bandwidth differs: 576.0 GB/s on the W7700 versus 432.0 GB/s on the LX PRO.

Shading unit counts differ substantially: the W7700 has 3,072 shading units, while the LX PRO has 6,144, exactly double. Texture mapping units are identical at 192 for both. Raster operation units are also identical at 96 for both. The W7700 has 48 ray tracing cores, while the LX PRO has no ray tracing core count recorded.

Clock speeds follow a different pattern. The W7700 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded. Both cards list the same memory clock: 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Process node differs: the W7700 uses a 5 nm process, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC. Transistor count is 28,100 million for the W7700, while the LX PRO's transistor count is unknown. Die size is 346 mm² for the W7700, unknown for the LX PRO. Transistor density is 81.2M per mm² for the W7700, not recorded for the LX PRO.

Power specifications differ. The W7700 has a TDP of 190 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Display outputs differ. The W7700 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1. The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interfaces. Both are dual-slot cards.

Physical dimensions differ slightly. The W7700 measures 241 mm in length and 111 mm in height. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length and 118 mm in height, with a width of 48 mm. The W7700's width is not recorded.

Architecture Differences

The W7700 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename "Wheat Nas" and the generation label "Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)." The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip built on TrueGPU architecture, with no codename and the generation label "7G100."

The W7700 is manufactured on a 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The LX PRO is manufactured on a 6 nm process with unknown transistor count and die size. The foundry for both is TSMC.

The W7700's architecture includes 48 ray tracing cores, which the LX PRO does not list. The LX PRO doubles the shading unit count to 6,144, but this does not translate into higher recorded throughput. The W7700's FP32 rate of 31.95 TFLOPS exceeds the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS despite having half the shading units, indicating a higher per-unit efficiency in the W7700's RDNA 3.0 design.

API support differs in Vulkan version: the W7700 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The W7700's predecessor is listed as Radeon Pro Vega, and it has no successor. The LX PRO has no predecessor or successor listed. The W7700 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD, while the LX PRO has no launch MSRP recorded.

The LX PRO's production status is Active, while the W7700 has no production status listed. Release dates differ: the W7700 launched on 2023-11-12, and the LX PRO is dated 2026-03-16.

The Verdict

The data directs different users to different cards. For measured compute performance, the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is the clear choice. It has an average benchmark score of 118,976, a 95th percentile rank, and verified results in both Geekbench OpenCL (108,245) and Geekbench Vulkan (129,706). Its FP32 throughput of 31.95 TFLOPS, FP16 throughput of 63.90 TFLOPS, pixel rate of 249.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate of 499.2 GTexel/s all exceed the LX PRO's corresponding figures by 30.0%.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark results in the database. Its average score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50. Any selection based on the LX PRO must rely on its specification sheet alone, not on measured outcomes. Its 24 GB memory capacity is its strongest attribute, providing 50.0% more memory than the W7700's 16 GB. Its bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is lower, and its FP32 and FP16 rates are lower by 7.37 TFLOPS and 14.75 TFLOPS respectively.

For workloads that fit within 16 GB, the W7700 offers faster compute and faster memory bandwidth. For workloads that require more than 16 GB of video memory, the LX PRO is the only option that can accommodate them. The W7700 also uses less power at 190 W versus 225 W, and it requires a smaller power supply at 450 W versus 550 W.

The W7700's newer DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support a newer display standard than the LX PRO's DisplayPort 1.4a. The W7700's 5 nm process node is smaller than the LX PRO's 6 nm node. The W7700 has ray tracing cores, the LX PRO does not list any.

The LX PRO's active production status and later release date suggest current availability, but the database records no performance evidence for it. The W7700's launch MSRP of 999 USD places it in the professional workstation segment, and its benchmark scores confirm it performs at the 95th percentile of all recorded GPUs.

Selection depends on whether measured performance or memory capacity takes priority. The W7700 wins every recorded performance metric. The LX PRO wins memory capacity and offers an active production status. Without any benchmark data for the LX PRO, the W7700 remains the only card with verified performance in the database.