AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the architectural generations of the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip. Both are manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Q: How much memory does each card have, and what type?

A: Both cards have 16 GB of memory. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses GDDR6, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses GDDR7. The NVIDIA memory runs at 28 Gbps effective compared to 18 Gbps effective on the AMD card.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is significantly higher than the 576.0 GB/s of the AMD Radeon PRO W7700. Both use a 256 bit bus width.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 31.95 TFLOPS for the AMD Radeon PRO W7700. The AMD card has a 2:1 FP16 ratio (63.90 TFLOPS), while the NVIDIA card has a 1:1 ratio (43.94 TFLOPS).

Q: What are the thermal and power specifications?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has a TDP of 190 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W and a single 8-pin connector. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and uses a single 16-pin connector; no suggested PSU is listed in the database.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas, and belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and is part of the GeForce 50-series. Both are fabricated at TSMC on a 5 nm process, but the transistor counts differ considerably: the AMD chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, while the NVIDIA chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The transistor density reflects this, with AMD at 81.2M per mm² and NVIDIA at 120.6M per mm².

The compute resources differ substantially. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with 48 RT cores and no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The NVIDIA card therefore carries far more general-purpose shader hardware and dedicated tensor acceleration.

The memory architecture also differs. The AMD card uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective transfer, versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective on the AMD card.

Interface and connectivity differ as well. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs on the AMD card are 4x DisplayPort 2.1; the NVIDIA card offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark data between the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is not recorded in the database, with no shared test results and zero wins recorded for either side. The two cards were measured under different benchmark suites, which complicates any direct comparison.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has two recorded benchmark scores. In Geekbench OpenCL it scores 108245, and in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 129706. Its average benchmark score is 118976, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals to the AMD card are the NVIDIA GB10 at 117393 (1.3% delta), the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation at 117088 (1.6% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB at 114395 (4% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile at 113944 (4.4% delta). The AMD card sits above all of these in average score.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a single recorded benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. Its average benchmark score is 6270, placing it in the 36th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at 6270 (0% delta), the NVIDIA Quadro K620 at 6282 (-0.2% delta), the AMD FirePro W600 at 6223 (0.8% delta), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 (-0.9% delta). The NVIDIA card sits essentially level with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, slightly behind the K620 and R7 M350, and slightly ahead of the FirePro W600.

The disparity in percentile ranking is notable. The AMD card ranks in the 95th percentile of all GPUs based on its average score, while the NVIDIA card ranks in the 36th percentile. However, the benchmarks used are not the same: the AMD results come from Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, while the NVIDIA result comes from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The database does not provide a normalized cross-test comparison between these two specific cards.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER differ across nearly every major specification field.

The AMD card uses a Navi 32 chip on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Wheat Nas, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA card uses a GB203 chip on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 generation. The AMD card was released on 2023-11-12, while the NVIDIA card has a release date of 2025-12-31. The NVIDIA card has an active production status; the AMD card has no production status listed.

The AMD card has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The AMD card has a higher boost clock, while the NVIDIA card has a higher base clock.

Memory specifications differ in type and bandwidth. The AMD card has 16 GB GDDR6 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 16 GB GDDR7 at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both have a 256 bit bus width.

Compute resources differ significantly. The AMD card has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The NVIDIA card has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The AMD card has 48 RT cores and no tensor cores listed; the NVIDIA card has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores.

Pixel and texture rates differ. The AMD card delivers 249.6 GPixel/s and 499.2 GTexel/s, while the NVIDIA card delivers 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s. The AMD card has a higher pixel rate; the NVIDIA card has a substantially higher texture rate.

FP32 and FP16 throughput differ in both magnitude and ratio. The AMD card has 31.95 TFLOPS FP32 and 63.90 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The NVIDIA card has 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 43.94 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1).

Power and physical characteristics differ. The AMD card has a TDP of 190 W, a dual-slot design, a single 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 350 W, a dual-slot design, a single 16-pin power connector, and no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card is 241 mm (9.5 inches) long and 111 mm (4.4 inches) high, with no width listed. The NVIDIA card is 304 mm (12 inches) long, 137 mm (5.4 inches) high, and 48 mm (1.9 inches) wide.

The bus interface differs: the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs differ: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 on the AMD card versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b on the NVIDIA card.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 shows advantages in several measured areas. Its boost clock of 2600 MHz is higher than the 2452 MHz of the NVIDIA card. Its pixel rate of 249.6 GPixel/s exceeds the 235.4 GPixel/s of the NVIDIA card, indicating faster rasterization throughput at the ROP level. Its FP16 performance of 63.90 TFLOPS is considerably higher than the 43.94 TFLOPS of the NVIDIA card, which can matter for workloads that use half-precision math. The AMD card also has a lower TDP of 190 W versus 350 W, and uses a single 8-pin power connector, simplifying power delivery requirements. Its smaller physical footprint, 241 mm length versus 304 mm, makes it easier to fit into compact chassis.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER shows advantages in other areas. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is roughly 37% higher than the 31.95 TFLOPS of the AMD card, based on the recorded figures. Its memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s is about 55% higher than the 576.0 GB/s of the AMD card. The NVIDIA card has 280 tensor cores, which the AMD card lacks entirely, and 70 RT cores versus 48. Its texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s is higher than the 499.2 GTexel/s of the AMD card. The NVIDIA card also uses GDDR7 memory and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, both newer than the GDDR6 and PCIe 4.0 x16 of the AMD card.

The AMD card holds the higher overall percentile ranking at 95th versus 36th for the NVIDIA card, based on their respective benchmark averages. However, the benchmark suites differ, so this percentile gap should not be read as a direct performance comparison across identical workloads.

The Verdict

The data indicates two cards designed for different priorities. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 delivers strong rasterization metrics, with a higher boost clock, higher pixel rate, and notably higher FP16 throughput. It consumes less power at 190 W, uses a standard 8-pin connector, and occupies less space. Its benchmark results place it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 118976 across Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests. This card appears oriented toward compute tasks that leverage half-precision math and toward environments where power and physical space are constrained.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers substantially higher FP32 throughput at 43.94 TFLOPS, higher memory bandwidth at 896.0 GB/s, and adds tensor cores with 280 units on top of 70 RT cores. Its texture rate is higher, and it uses newer GDDR7 memory with a PCIe 5.0 interface. The single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 places it at the 36th percentile, though this is measured under a different benchmark than the AMD results. The NVIDIA card carries a higher TDP of 350 W and requires a 16-pin power connector.

For workloads that depend on FP32 compute, memory bandwidth, or tensor acceleration, the recorded data favors the NVIDIA card. For workloads that rely on FP16 throughput, pixel fill rate, or lower power draw, the recorded data favors the AMD card. The absence of shared benchmark results means the database does not offer a single unified performance ranking between the two. The choice rests on which specification set matches the intended workload. The AMD card holds a higher launch MSRP of 999 USD, while the NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, but neither price is reflected in the benchmark data.