AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data separates these two GPUs into distinct performance classes. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 ranks in the 95th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits in the 80th percentile. This 15-percentile gap reflects a significant difference in raw compute output, especially in OpenCL workloads where the NVIDIA part leads by 24.8%.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins both head-to-head benchmark comparisons recorded in the database, taking Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 143870 against 108245, and Geekbench Vulkan with 139213 against 129706. The AMD card's average benchmark score of 118976 places it near rivals like the NVIDIA GB10 (117393, 1.3% ahead) and the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (117088, 1.6% ahead). The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's average score of 35435 is dragged down by its Passmark results, which are low-scoring tests, but its OpenCL and Vulkan numbers clearly exceed the AMD card.

The data suggests the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the stronger choice for compute-heavy applications that rely on OpenCL or Vulkan acceleration. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700, however, appears as a more consistent performer across a wider set of workloads, given its higher percentile ranking and higher average score when considering all benchmarks in the database. Users who prioritize a single high-performance compute API should choose the NVIDIA part; users who need a balanced professional GPU with broader driver support may favor the AMD card.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143870 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 24.8% higher than the AMD Radeon PRO W7700's 108245.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in Vulkan performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile leads in Geekbench Vulkan with 139213, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 scores 129706, a 6.8% difference in favor of NVIDIA.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 672.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus using GDDR7 memory, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 provides 576.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus using GDDR6 memory.

Q: What are the transistor counts for each chip?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses the Navi 32 chip with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die.

Q: What is the power draw specification for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has a 190 W TDP and uses a single 8-pin power connector. The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP and requires no power connectors, as it is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) for portable devices.

Q: Which GPU has the higher pixel fill rate?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 achieves 249.6 GPixel/s, which is more than double the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 115.8 GPixel/s.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, codenamed Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB205 chip and belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile series.

Both chips are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the die sizes differ substantially. The AMD chip measures 346 mm², while the NVIDIA chip is smaller at 263 mm². Despite the smaller die, the NVIDIA chip packs more transistors: 31,100 million versus 28,100 million. This results in a higher transistor density for the NVIDIA part at 118.3M per mm², compared to 81.2M per mm² for the AMD chip.

The memory subsystems differ in type and bandwidth. The AMD card uses GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus, while the NVIDIA card uses GDDR7 memory with a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA part achieves higher total bandwidth (672.0 GB/s) despite the narrower bus, due to the higher effective memory speed of 28 Gbps versus 18 Gbps for the AMD card.

Compute resources are distributed differently. The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has 3,072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 48 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed in the database. The AMD card has more ROPs and TMUs, while the NVIDIA card has nearly double the shading units and a dedicated tensor core array.

The bus interface also differs: the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The AMD card is a dual-slot add-in board with a 241 mm length and 111 mm height, requiring a 450 W suggested PSU. The NVIDIA card is an integrated graphics processor with no slot width specification and no power connectors, as it is designed for portable devices.

Specification Differences

The database records several specification fields where the two GPUs diverge. The most obvious difference is the form factor: the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is a dual-slot discrete card with a 1x 8-pin power connector, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP with no power connectors. The AMD card has a length of 241 mm (9.5 inches) and height of 111 mm (4.4 inches), while the NVIDIA card has no physical dimensions recorded.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The AMD card has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a much lower base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz. Memory clocks also differ: the AMD card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the NVIDIA card runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

Memory capacity and type differ: the AMD card has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, while the NVIDIA card has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus. The bandwidth favors the NVIDIA card at 672.0 GB/s versus 576.0 GB/s for the AMD card.

Compute throughput numbers show a mixed picture. The AMD card delivers 31.95 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 63.90 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). The NVIDIA card delivers 17.04 TFLOPS of FP32 and 17.04 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio). The AMD card has higher pixel rate (249.6 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s) and higher texture rate (499.2 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s).

The TDP values are starkly different: the AMD card consumes 190 W, while the NVIDIA card consumes only 60 W. The AMD card has a suggested PSU of 450 W, while the NVIDIA card has no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card has 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the NVIDIA card's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

The release dates differ by over a year: the AMD card launched on 2023-11-12, while the NVIDIA card launched on 2025-02-28. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the NVIDIA card's predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile. The AMD card has a recorded launch MSRP of 999 USD, while the NVIDIA card has no launch MSRP in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records two direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these GPUs, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins both. In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA card scores 143870, which is 24.8% higher than the AMD Radeon PRO W7700's 108245. This is a substantial margin, indicating a major advantage for the NVIDIA part in OpenCL compute workloads.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the NVIDIA card scores 139213, while the AMD card scores 129706. The NVIDIA advantage here is 6.8%, a narrower margin but still a clear win. The Vulkan results show that the AMD card is more competitive in this API, but the NVIDIA part still leads.

The head-to-head tally shows 0 wins for the AMD card and 2 wins for the NVIDIA card. However, the overall benchmark picture is more complex. The AMD card's average benchmark score of 118976 places it in the 95th percentile, while the NVIDIA card's average score of 35435 places it in the 80th percentile. This discrepancy arises because the NVIDIA card has nine recorded benchmarks, including several Passmark tests with low scores, while the AMD card has only two recorded benchmarks.

The AMD card's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GB10 (117393, 1.3% behind), NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (117088, 1.6% behind), NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (114395, 4% behind), and NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile (113944, 4.4% behind). These deltas show that the AMD card is closely matched with several professional NVIDIA GPUs, all within a 4.4% range.

The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (35520, 0.2% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35860, 1.2% ahead), NVIDIA A2 (34690, 2.1% behind), and NVIDIA T1000 (36289, 2.4% ahead). These deltas show that the NVIDIA card's average score is tightly clustered with these older or lower-tier GPUs, reflecting the impact of the low Passmark scores on its average.

The FP32 compute figures reveal an interesting inversion. The AMD card delivers 31.95 TFLOPS, nearly double the NVIDIA card's 17.04 TFLOPS. Yet in real-world OpenCL benchmarks, the NVIDIA card outperforms the AMD card by 24.8%. This suggests that the NVIDIA architecture achieves higher efficiency per FP32 unit, or that the benchmark workloads are not purely FP32-bound.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in raw compute benchmark performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 143870 is 24.8% ahead of the AMD card, and its Vulkan score of 139213 is 6.8% ahead. These results indicate that the NVIDIA part is the stronger choice for applications that use OpenCL or Vulkan for general-purpose GPU compute. The card also has a much lower TDP of 60 W, making it suitable for portable devices where power consumption is a limiting factor.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 wins in several specification categories that matter for specific workloads. Its FP32 throughput of 31.95 TFLOPS is nearly double the NVIDIA card's 17.04 TFLOPS, which could benefit compute tasks that are heavily dependent on raw floating-point arithmetic. The AMD card also has higher pixel rate (249.6 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s) and higher texture rate (499.2 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s), indicating stronger rasterization capabilities for graphics rendering.

The AMD card has more memory capacity at 16 GB versus 12 GB, which matters for large datasets or high-resolution textures. It also has more ROPs (96 versus 80) and more TMUs (192 versus 184), though the NVIDIA card has more shading units (5,888 versus 3,072) and ray tracing cores (46 versus 48, but the NVIDIA card adds 184 tensor cores).

The AMD card's 95th percentile ranking versus the NVIDIA card's 80th percentile suggests that the AMD card performs more consistently across the full range of benchmarks in the database. The AMD card's nearest rivals are all professional-grade NVIDIA GPUs with scores in the 113,944 to 117,393 range, indicating that it competes in the professional workstation segment. The NVIDIA card's nearest rivals include older or lower-tier GPUs like the Quadro GV100 and T1000, reflecting its mixed benchmark profile.

For users who need a professional workstation card with DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, PCIe 4.0 x16 connectivity, and a dual-slot form factor, the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 provides a complete package. For users who need maximum compute performance in OpenCL or Vulkan, and who operate in portable or power-constrained environments, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers superior results despite its lower clock speeds and smaller memory footprint. The data does not support a single winner across all criteria; the choice depends on which workloads and form factor constraints matter most.