AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE are both RDNA 3.0 parts, but they target different corners of the GPU market. The PRO W7700 is a workstation card built on the larger Navi 32 die, while the RX 7650 GRE is a mainstream gaming card on the smaller Navi 33 die. The recorded data shows a significant performance gap, with the PRO W7700 holding a 95th percentile rank across all GPUs versus the RX 7650 GRE’s 83rd percentile. This analysis breaks down where each card wins, how their architectures differ, and what the benchmark numbers actually mean for a buyer.

Where Each One Wins

The PRO W7700 wins the only shared benchmark in the database, and it wins decisively. In Geekbench OpenCL, a compute-oriented test, the PRO W7700 scores 108245 against the RX 7650 GRE’s 83109. That is a 30.2% advantage, which places the PRO W7700 in a different performance class for raw compute workloads. Its average benchmark score of 118976 dwarfs the RX 7650 GRE’s 42723, though that average includes different test sets, so the direct OpenCL comparison is the cleaner metric.

The RX 7650 GRE does not win any head-to-head benchmark in the recorded data. Its strength is not in raw compute but in its positioning as a lower-power, smaller-footprint card. It runs on a 170 W TDP versus the PRO W7700’s 190 W, and it is physically shorter at 204 mm versus 241 mm. For a compact build or a system with tight power headroom, the RX 7650 GRE is the more practical choice despite losing the compute benchmarks. It also has a separate 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2336, which the PRO W7700 does not have in the database, so direct gaming performance cannot be compared from these records.

The data indicates a clear split: the PRO W7700 is for compute-heavy professional workloads, while the RX 7650 GRE is for general gaming and desktop use where its smaller size and lower power draw matter more than peak throughput.

Architecture Differences

Both cards use the RDNA 3.0 architecture, but they are built on different chips and processes. The PRO W7700 uses the Navi 32 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7650 GRE uses Navi 33, on a 6 nm process, also TSMC. The process difference explains part of the transistor gap: the PRO W7700 packs 28,100 million transistors into a 346 mm² die, while the RX 7650 GRE fits 13,300 million transistors into 204 mm². Transistor density is higher on the PRO W7700 at 81.2M per mm² versus 65.2M per mm² on the RX 7650 GRE.

The PRO W7700 has more of every execution resource. It carries 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The RX 7650 GRE has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Ray tracing cores follow the same pattern: 48 on the PRO W7700 versus 32 on the RX 7650 GRE. Neither card has tensor cores listed in the database.

Memory is another major differentiator. The PRO W7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s. That is exactly half the memory capacity and half the bandwidth. Memory clocks are identical at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, so the bandwidth difference comes entirely from the bus width.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The RX 7650 GRE has a higher boost clock at 2695 MHz versus the PRO W7700’s 2600 MHz, and it also lists a game clock of 2350 MHz. The PRO W7700’s base clock is higher at 1900 MHz versus 1720 MHz. The RX 7650 GRE’s higher boost helps it close the gap in lightly threaded or clock-sensitive tasks, but the PRO W7700’s larger resource pool wins in sustained throughput.

The interface also differs. The PRO W7700 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8. For a workstation card feeding large datasets, the full x16 connection is a meaningful advantage. Display outputs differ too: the PRO W7700 has four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the RX 7650 GRE has one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains one direct head-to-head benchmark between these two cards: Geekbench OpenCL. The PRO W7700 scores 108245, and the RX 7650 GRE scores 83109. The delta is 30.2% in favor of the PRO W7700. This is a large margin, and it reflects the PRO W7700’s 50% more shading units, 50% more TMUs, and double the memory bandwidth.

Looking at the nearest rivals adds context. The PRO W7700’s average score of 118976 puts it 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GB10 and 1.6% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. It also leads the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB by 4% and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile by 4.4%. These are all professional or workstation-class cards, which confirms the PRO W7700 sits in the upper tier of the database.

The RX 7650 GRE’s average score of 42723 places it just behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, which scores 43223 for a delta of -1.2%. It is also 1.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262, and 1.3% behind both the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000. These are small deltas, meaning the RX 7650 GRE is tightly grouped with mid-range cards in the database’s scoring.

The PRO W7700 also has a Geekbench Vulkan score of 129706, which is not matched by the RX 7650 GRE in the recorded data. That Vulkan result reinforces the PRO W7700’s strength in cross-platform compute and graphics APIs. The RX 7650 GRE’s only other benchmark is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336, which has no corresponding PRO W7700 result, so no direct comparison exists for that test.

The data shows a one-sided head-to-head, but the margin is not uniform across all workloads. The PRO W7700’s 30.2% OpenCL lead is substantial, but it comes from a test that heavily favors the PRO W7700’s compute resources. In games or lighter workloads, the RX 7650 GRE’s higher boost clock could narrow the gap, but the database does not include a gaming benchmark for both cards.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 for compute-heavy professional workloads. It wins the only shared benchmark by 30.2%, has double the memory capacity and bandwidth, and sits at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are workstation cards like the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Tesla V100 SXM2, which confirms its positioning. A buyer running OpenCL compute, large datasets, or multi-display professional setups should pick the PRO W7700 based on this data.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the choice for a compact gaming or general-purpose system. It loses the compute comparison but offers a smaller 204 mm length, a lower 170 W TDP, and the same 450 W suggested PSU as the PRO W7700. Its 83rd percentile rank and tight grouping with the RTX 4070 SUPER and Quadro M6000 show it is a solid mid-range card, just not in the PRO W7700’s class for raw throughput. The RX 7650 GRE also has an HDMI 2.1a output, which the PRO W7700 lacks, and a higher boost clock of 2695 MHz.

The launch MSRP for the PRO W7700 is 999 USD. The RX 7650 GRE has a launch MSRP of 279 USD. Neither card is a replacement for the other; they serve different buyers, and the benchmark data reflects that separation clearly.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in OpenCL compute?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 scores 108245 in Geekbench OpenCL versus 83109 for the RX 7650 GRE, a 30.2% advantage.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The PRO W7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The PRO W7700 uses a 5 nm TSMC process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The RX 7650 GRE uses a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

Q: Does the RX 7650 GRE have a higher boost clock?

A: Yes, the RX 7650 GRE boosts to 2695 MHz, while the PRO W7700 boosts to 2600 MHz. The PRO W7700 has a higher base clock at 1900 MHz versus 1720 MHz.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each card?

A: The PRO W7700 is 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GB10 and 1.6% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. The RX 7650 GRE is 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and 1.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB.

Q: What display outputs does each card have?

A: The PRO W7700 has four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The RX 7650 GRE has one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7700 | AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 32 | Navi 33 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | 13,300 million |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 81.2M / mm² | 65.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 1720 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 2695 MHz |

| Game Clock | Not listed | 2350 MHz |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3072 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 192 | 128 |

| ROPs | 96 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 32 |

| FP32 | 31.95 TFLOPS | 22.08 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 63.90 TFLOPS (2:1) | 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 249.6 GPixel/s | 172.5 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 499.2 GTexel/s | 345.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 190 W | 170 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Length | 241 mm | 204 mm |

| Height | 111 mm | 115 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-11-12 | 2025-02-06 |

| Launch MSRP | 999 USD | 279 USD |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 95 | 83 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 118976 | 42723 |