AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single benchmark comparison set for the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and none for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The AMD card posts an average benchmark score of 87,108, derived from its Geekbench OpenCL result of 81,528 and its Geekbench Vulkan result of 92,688. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its average at zero and its performance percentile at 50, compared to the AMD card’s 93rd percentile among all GPUs. This absence of direct head-to-head measurements means the comparison relies entirely on the AMD card’s nearest rivals to establish a performance context.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 sits within a tight cluster of competing workstation and compute cards. Its average score of 87,108 is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, which averages 87,445. It is 1.7% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 40HX, which scores 85,637. The gap widens against the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile, where the W7600 trails by 4.4% (91,134 vs. 87,108), and against the desktop NVIDIA RTX A4500, where the deficit reaches 5% (91,671 vs. 87,108). These deltas place the W7600 in a competitive position among mid-tier professional GPUs, slightly below the higher-end RTX A4500 variants but clearly above the CMP 40HX.

For the Lisuan Tech LX PRO, the lack of benchmark entries in the database prevents any numerical comparison. Its 50th percentile ranking, combined with an average score of zero, indicates that the database has no measured performance data for this card. The head-to-head benchmark section therefore contains no wins for either product, as the LX PRO has no recorded scores to compare against the AMD card’s results. Any assessment of the LX PRO must rely on its architectural specifications alone, which are discussed in the following sections.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation (Navi III Series). The Lisuan Tech LX PRO employs the 7G105 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation, with no codename listed. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process, so the fabrication node is identical, but the transistor counts and die sizes differ significantly. The AMD card integrates 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The LX PRO lists unknown transistor count and die size, making density calculations impossible.

Memory configurations present a notable split. The W7600 carries 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO offers 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Both use the same memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate, but the wider bus on the LX PRO provides substantially higher total bandwidth. The AMD card’s memory is sufficient for standard professional workloads, while the LX PRO’s larger pool and higher bandwidth target memory-intensive applications.

Compute resources also differ sharply. The W7600 has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores are listed. This gives the LX PRO three times the shading units, 1.5 times the TMUs, and 1.5 times the ROPs of the AMD card. The resulting peak rates reflect this: the W7600 reaches 156.2 GPixel/s pixel fill and 312.3 GTexel/s texture fill, while the LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance follows the same pattern. The W7600 delivers 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.98 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), whereas the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The LX PRO holds a 23% advantage in FP32 and a similar margin in FP16.

Power and physical characteristics diverge as well. The W7600 has a 130 W TDP, a single-slot design, a single 6-pin power connector, and a suggested 300 W power supply. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot design, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply. The AMD card measures 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Bus interfaces differ: the W7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16, giving the latter double the interface bandwidth.

Display outputs and API support show additional differences. The W7600 provides four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the LX PRO provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The W7600 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The AMD card’s newer DisplayPort standard and higher Vulkan version give it an edge in modern display connectivity and API compatibility.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in areas tied to its established benchmark presence and connectivity. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 92,688 indicates strong graphics API performance, which is relevant for workloads that leverage Vulkan rendering. Its 93rd percentile ranking among all GPUs places it above the majority of graphics cards in the database. The card’s DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support higher display bandwidth than the LX PRO’s DisplayPort 1.4a, which matters for multi-monitor setups or high-resolution displays. Its single-slot design and 130 W TDP make it a more compact and power-efficient option, suitable for systems where space and thermal headroom are limited. The 6-pin power connector and 300 W suggested PSU also reduce system power requirements compared to the LX PRO’s 16-pin connector and 550 W suggestion.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins clearly in raw compute capacity and memory volume. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 is three times the W7600’s 8 GB, and its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is 50% higher than the AMD card’s 288.0 GB/s. For workloads that load large datasets into VRAM, such as machine learning training, large-scale rendering, or scientific simulation, the LX PRO’s memory advantage is decisive. Its 6,144 shading units and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 exceed the W7600’s 2,048 units and 19.99 TFLOPS, giving it a lead in compute-heavy parallel tasks. The 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs provide higher texture and pixel throughput, which helps in rendering and image processing. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface doubles the data transfer bandwidth between the card and the host system, reducing bottlenecks for data-intensive workloads.

The AMD card counters with ray tracing support. Its 32 ray tracing cores are absent from the LX PRO entirely, so any workload involving hardware-accelerated ray tracing will favor the W7600. This includes realistic rendering in DCC applications and certain game development tasks. The W7600 also carries a Vulkan 1.4 implementation versus the LX PRO’s Vulkan 1.3, which may enable newer extension usage in compatible applications.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split by workload type. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the appropriate choice for users who prioritize established benchmark-proven performance, ray tracing capability, compact physical design, and modern display outputs. Its recorded scores against NVIDIA rivals show it holds its own in the mid-tier professional segment, sitting just below the RTX A4500 and RTX A4500 Mobile while outperforming the CMP 40HX. Its 8 GB memory is adequate for standard professional tasks, and its 130 W TDP makes it easier to integrate into smaller workstations.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the appropriate choice for users who need maximum memory capacity and raw compute throughput. Its 24 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth outperform the W7600 by wide margins, and its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 gives it a 23% compute advantage. The absence of benchmark data means its real-world performance is unverified in the database, but the architectural specifications indicate a formidable compute-oriented card. The lack of ray tracing cores and the older DisplayPort 1.4a standard limit its appeal for ray-traced rendering and the latest display connectivity, but for memory-bound and compute-heavy workloads, the LX PRO is the stronger specification on paper.

Users should note that the LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, so its percentile ranking of 50 is a placeholder rather than a measured result. The W7600’s 93rd percentile is based on actual test results. Choosing between the two therefore depends on whether verified performance and feature completeness matter more than raw specifications and memory capacity.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The W7600 averages 87,108 in benchmark scores. It is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 (87,445), 1.7% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 40HX (85,637), 4.4% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile (91,134), and 5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4500 (91,671).

Q: What are the benchmark scores for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO?

A: The database contains no benchmark entries for the LX PRO. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 50.

Q: Which card has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO support ray tracing?

A: No ray tracing cores are listed for the LX PRO. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 includes 32 ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a 130 W TDP, a single 6-pin power connector, and a suggested 300 W power supply. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card supports newer display outputs and API versions?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 provides four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and supports Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Chip | Navi 33 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Codename | Hotpink Bonefish | none |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | unknown |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | none |

| Pixel Rate | 156.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 312.3 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 19.99 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 39.98 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 130 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 248 mm (9.8 inches) |

| Height | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 118 mm (4.6 inches) |

| Width | not listed | 48 mm (1.9 inches) |

| Release Date | 2023-08-02 | 2026-03-16 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | none |