AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for these two GPUs comes from different benchmark suites, which makes direct numerical comparison difficult. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has two benchmark entries in the database: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 81528 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 92688. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 87108. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a single recorded result in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, scoring 6269.5, with an average benchmark score of 6270.

Because the benchmark workloads differ, the raw scores cannot be compared against each other as if they measured the same thing. However, the database does provide context through percentile rankings and nearest rival comparisons. The AMD card sits at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of recorded graphics processors. The NVIDIA card, by contrast, sits at the 36th percentile, which places it below most other recorded GPUs in the database.

The nearest rival analysis for the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 shows it performs within a narrow band around several NVIDIA workstation and mining cards. Against the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, the AMD card trails by 0.4 percent. Against the NVIDIA CMP 40HX, it leads by 1.7 percent. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile is 4.4 percent faster, and the desktop NVIDIA RTX A4500 is 5 percent faster. These deltas indicate the W7600 delivers performance very close to the RTX A4500 family, slightly behind those two models but ahead of the GP100 and CMP 40HX.

The nearest rival analysis for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER shows a different picture. It matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly, with a delta of 0 percent. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 is 0.2 percent faster, the AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8 percent slower, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9 percent slower. These comparisons suggest the recorded benchmark for the 5070 Ti SUPER is an outlier relative to its expected performance class, as the delta values against much older, lower-tier cards are unusually small.

The head-to-head benchmark array in the database contains no entries, meaning there is no shared workload where both cards were tested under identical conditions. The wins count for each card stands at zero. This absence of common test data means any performance comparison must rely on the separate benchmark contexts each card was measured in.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 shows its strongest results in compute-oriented workloads. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 92688 exceeds its Geekbench OpenCL score of 81528 by roughly 13.7 percent, indicating the architecture responds well to the Vulkan API path. The Vulkan result also pushes the average benchmark score upward, as the average of the two tests is 87108. The 93rd percentile ranking confirms that this card performs in the upper tier of all recorded GPUs, a position reinforced by its narrow margins against the RTX A4500 series.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, based on its single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, delivers a result that lands it at the 36th percentile. This places it below the median GPU in the database. The card matches the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly in this workload, which suggests parity with that specific configuration. The near-zero deltas against the Quadro K620, FirePro W600, and Radeon R7 M350 indicate that in this particular DX12 test, the 5070 Ti SUPER does not separate itself from those older products. That outcome is unexpected given the hardware specifications, but the database records what it records.

For use-case segmentation, the AMD card wins in raw compute throughput as measured by Geekbench, particularly in Vulkan. The NVIDIA card wins in the specific DX12 gaming workload tested by 3DMark Steel Nomad, though its percentile position suggests that result does not translate to broad superiority across the database. The AMD card also wins on percentile ranking by a wide margin: 93 versus 36. The NVIDIA card wins on memory capacity and bandwidth, as detailed later, but those advantages do not show up in its recorded benchmark performance.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The chip is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a die size of 204 mm². The transistor density works out to 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50-series generation. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 45,600 million transistors on a die size of 378 mm². The transistor density is 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter, nearly double that of the AMD chip.

The ray tracing hardware differs substantially. The AMD card has 32 ray tracing cores, while the NVIDIA card has 70. The NVIDIA card also includes 280 tensor cores, a feature the AMD card does not list. The shading unit count favors NVIDIA heavily: 8960 shading units versus 2048. Texture mapping units stand at 280 for NVIDIA and 128 for AMD. Render output units are 96 for NVIDIA and 64 for AMD.

The memory architectures are entirely different generations. The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, achieving 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock for the AMD card is listed as 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer rate. The NVIDIA memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective transfer rate.

The process node difference is small but meaningful: 6 nm for AMD versus 5 nm for NVIDIA. The transistor count difference is large: NVIDIA packs more than three times as many transistors into a die that is about 85 percent larger. The resulting density gap of 120.6M versus 65.2M per square millimeter reflects the newer process and denser design.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The process node is 6 nm for the AMD card and 5 nm for the NVIDIA card. Transistor counts are 13,300 million versus 45,600 million. Die size is 204 mm² versus 378 mm². Transistor density is 65.2M per mm² versus 120.6M per mm².

Clock speeds differ in base and boost values. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The boost clocks are close, but the base clock difference is substantial, with NVIDIA running about 33 percent higher at idle or low load.

Memory specifications show the largest gaps. The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA memory bandwidth is more than three times that of the AMD card.

Compute throughput numbers favor NVIDIA. The AMD card delivers 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.98 TFLOPS FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). The NVIDIA card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 43.94 TFLOPS FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The NVIDIA FP32 figure is more than double the AMD figure. The FP16 ratio difference means NVIDIA maintains full throughput for FP16, while AMD halves its rate.

Pixel and texture rates also favor NVIDIA. The AMD card achieves 156.2 GPixel/s and 312.3 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card achieves 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s. The texture rate for NVIDIA is more than double.

Power and physical specifications differ as well. The AMD card has a TDP of 130 W, uses a single-slot cooler, and requires a single 6-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 300 W. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 350 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, and requires a single 16-pin power connector with no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card measures 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Bus interface and display outputs differ. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and provides 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates differ: the AMD card released on 2023-08-02, while the NVIDIA card has a release date of 2025-12-31. The AMD card lists a predecessor of Radeon Pro Vega, while the NVIDIA card lists no predecessor or successor.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, which is more than double the 19.99 TFLOPS of the AMD Radeon PRO W7600.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The NVIDIA card has 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The AMD card has 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The NVIDIA bandwidth is roughly 3.1 times higher.

Q: How do the percentile rankings compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 sits at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs in the database. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile.

Q: Are there any shared benchmarks between the two cards?

A: No. The AMD card has results for Geekbench OpenCL (81528) and Geekbench Vulkan (92688). The NVIDIA card has a single result for 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (6269.5). The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins count is zero for both cards.

Q: What are the transistor counts and die sizes?

A: The AMD chip has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The NVIDIA chip has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The transistor density is 65.2M per mm² for AMD and 120.6M per mm² for NVIDIA.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 ray tracing cores. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 32 ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the TDP values?

A: The AMD card has a TDP of 130 W. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 350 W.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The NVIDIA card has a boost clock of 2452 MHz, slightly higher than the AMD card's 2440 MHz. The base clocks differ more significantly: 2295 MHz for NVIDIA versus 1720 MHz for AMD.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear split between the two cards. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 demonstrates strong compute performance in its benchmark suite, achieving the 93rd percentile and an average score of 87108. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA RTX A4500 series, which beat it by 4.4 to 5 percent, and the Quadro GP100, which it trails by only 0.4 percent. It also leads the CMP 40HX by 1.7 percent. This places the W7600 firmly in the upper tier of workstation-class GPUs, with a particular strength in Vulkan workloads based on its 92688 Vulkan score versus 81528 OpenCL score.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, based solely on its recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, lands at the 36th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at exact parity, the Quadro K620 at 0.2 percent faster, the FirePro W600 at 0.8 percent slower, and the Radeon R7 M350 at 0.9 percent slower. The near-zero deltas against much older and lower-tier cards indicate the recorded workload did not showcase the card's architectural strengths.

For users selecting based on the database records, the AMD card wins on percentile ranking, compute benchmark scores, and efficiency metrics such as TDP (130 W versus 350 W) and physical size (single-slot versus dual-slot). It also offers four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, which suits multi-display professional setups. The NVIDIA card wins on raw specification counts: more shading units (8960 versus 2048), more texture mapping units (280 versus 128), more render output units (96 versus 64), more ray tracing cores (70 versus 32), tensor cores (280 versus none listed), higher memory capacity (16 GB versus 8 GB), higher memory bandwidth (896.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s), and higher FP32 throughput (43.94 TFLOPS versus 19.99 TFLOPS).

The architecture comparison shows NVIDIA using a denser 5 nm process with 120.6M transistors per mm² versus 65.2M for AMD, and a newer memory generation in GDDR7. These specification advantages do not translate into a higher percentile ranking in the database, which is a notable discrepancy. The AMD card's 93rd percentile versus the NVIDIA card's 36th percentile suggests that either the benchmark workloads favor the AMD architecture, or the NVIDIA card's recorded test does not represent its broader capabilities.

The database does not provide a shared workload for direct comparison, so the verdict depends on which metric the user prioritizes. For compute performance as measured by Geekbench and overall percentile standing, the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the stronger pick. For specification-driven workloads that demand maximum memory bandwidth, ray tracing hardware, and FP32 throughput, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER holds the advantage on paper. The launch MSRP for the AMD card is 599 USD, and for the NVIDIA card it is 749 USD. The data does not support a blanket recommendation for either card; it supports a workload-specific choice based on the metrics each card actually wins.