AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

The database comparison between the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile covers two very different product categories: a desktop workstation card built for professional rendering and compute, and a mobile GPU designed for high-performance laptops. The recorded data shows that the NVIDIA part wins both shared benchmark tests, but the AMD card holds its own in specific architectural strengths. The Radeon PRO W7600 sits at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile ranks at the 80th percentile. However, the NVIDIA card's average benchmark score of 35435 is heavily influenced by its Passmark results, which are not shared with the AMD part. The two Geekbench tests, which both cards have in common, tell a clearer story about raw compute performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data includes two tests: Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins both, with a 2-0 record in the comparison. In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA card scores 143870, while the Radeon PRO W7600 scores 81528. That is a delta of -43.3 percent for the AMD part, meaning the NVIDIA GPU delivers roughly 76 percent more performance in this test. The OpenCL workload is compute-heavy and scales with shading units, memory bandwidth, and driver optimization. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 5888 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, producing 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon PRO W7600 uses 2048 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, producing 288.0 GB/s. The combination of more than double the shading units and more than double the memory bandwidth explains the large gap in OpenCL.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the NVIDIA card scores 139213, and the AMD card scores 92688. The delta is -33.4 percent for the AMD part. The Vulkan test is more balanced than OpenCL, but the NVIDIA GPU still leads by a substantial margin. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores likely contribute to its Vulkan advantage, though the database does not isolate those effects. The Radeon PRO W7600 has 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, which limits its performance in workloads that use those units. The AMD card does post a higher pixel rate at 156.2 GPixel/s, compared to 115.8 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA part, and a higher texture rate at 312.3 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s. These fillrate advantages do not translate into wins in the shared benchmarks, but they indicate different design priorities. The Radeon PRO W7600 also has a higher FP32 throughput at 19.99 TFLOPS, compared to 17.04 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Despite that raw compute advantage, the NVIDIA card wins both tests, which suggests that memory bandwidth and driver efficiency matter more in these specific workloads.

The average benchmark scores in the database require careful interpretation because they do not cover the same set of tests. The Radeon PRO W7600 has an average score of 87108 based on its two Geekbench results. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an average score of 35435, but that figure includes nine tests: two Geekbench results and seven Passmark tests. The Passmark scores for the NVIDIA card are low in absolute terms, such as 151 in DirectX 10, 237 in DirectX 11, 102 in DirectX 12, 259 in DirectX 9, 981 in G2D, 24004 in G3D, and 10101 in GPU compute. These Passmark numbers drag down the NVIDIA card's average, making a direct comparison of average scores misleading. The nearest rivals in the database confirm this context. The Radeon PRO W7600 sits near the NVIDIA RTX A4500, which posts an average score of 91671 and a delta of -5 percent relative to the AMD card. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits near the NVIDIA Quadro GV100, which posts an average score of 35520 and a delta of -0.2 percent relative to the NVIDIA mobile part. The two cards simply occupy different segments of the database's performance distribution.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has an average benchmark score of 87108, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an average score of 35435. However, the averages are not directly comparable because the AMD card has only two recorded benchmarks, while the NVIDIA card has nine, including seven Passmark tests that score much lower than its Geekbench results.

Q: Which GPU wins the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins with a score of 143870, compared to 81528 for the AMD Radeon PRO W7600. The delta is -43.3 percent for the AMD card.

Q: How large is the gap in Geekbench Vulkan?

A: The NVIDIA card scores 139213, and the AMD card scores 92688. The delta is -33.4 percent for the AMD card, meaning the NVIDIA part leads by roughly a third in this test.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip has a higher transistor density at 118.3M per mm², compared to 65.2M per mm² for the AMD chip.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute rating?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is rated at 19.99 TFLOPS for FP32, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at 17.04 TFLOPS. The AMD card also has a higher FP16 rating at 39.98 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA card delivers 17.04 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and are built for different physical environments. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip, based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation and is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip, based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, and belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, and has a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The NVIDIA chip packs more than twice the transistors into a die that is only about 29 percent larger, which reflects the density advantage of the smaller process node.

The memory subsystems differ substantially. The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 12 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 192-bit bus and 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock figures also diverge: the AMD card runs its memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the NVIDIA card runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. The higher effective speed and wider bus give the NVIDIA card a clear bandwidth advantage. The compute unit counts show a similar pattern. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The NVIDIA card has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. The NVIDIA part also has 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, while the AMD part has 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores.

The FP16 performance tells an interesting story about architectural intent. The AMD card delivers 39.98 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, meaning it can process two FP16 operations per FP32 operation. The NVIDIA card delivers 17.04 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput matches its FP32 throughput. This difference suggests the AMD card is optimized for workloads that benefit from packed FP16 math, while the NVIDIA card prioritizes balanced throughput across precisions. Clock speeds also differ significantly. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz. The NVIDIA card's lower clocks are typical for a mobile part constrained by power, but its wider architecture compensates in most workloads.

The physical specifications reflect the different target platforms. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is a single-slot desktop card with a 241 mm length, 115 mm height, and a 1x 6-pin power connector. It has a 130 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 300 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an integrated graphics processor for laptops, with no slot width specified, no power connector, and a 60 W TDP. The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The AMD card offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the NVIDIA card's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop design. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data points to two different buyers. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the stronger performer in the shared benchmarks, winning both Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan by margins of 43.3 percent and 33.4 percent, respectively. Its 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than double the AMD card's 288.0 GB/s. It also has more shading units, more ray tracing cores, and the only tensor cores in this comparison. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the choice for workloads that rely on memory bandwidth, ray tracing, or tensor-based operations, and it does so at a 60 W TDP, which suits mobile platforms.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is not without advantages. It delivers higher FP32 throughput at 19.99 TFLOPS and much higher FP16 throughput at 39.98 TFLOPS, compared to 17.04 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card in both precisions. It also posts higher pixel and texture rates: 156.2 GPixel/s and 312.3 GTexel/s, versus 115.8 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA part. These figures indicate that the AMD card can handle fillrate-bound rasterization tasks efficiently, and its 93rd percentile ranking among all GPUs is higher than the NVIDIA card's 80th percentile. The AMD card also has a higher average benchmark score of 87108, though that figure only reflects its two Geekbench results.

The release timeline and predecessor information add context. The AMD card was released on 2023-08-02 and succeeds the Radeon Pro Vega, while the NVIDIA card was released on 2025-02-28 and succeeds the GeForce 40 Mobile series. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The NVIDIA card has no recorded launch MSRP. For users who need a desktop workstation card with DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and a single-slot form factor, the Radeon PRO W7600 fits that role. For users who need maximum compute performance in a power-constrained mobile package, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the better choice based on the recorded benchmark data.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every major specification category. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses a 6 nm process, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 5 nm process. Transistor counts are 13,300 million for the AMD chip and 31,100 million for the NVIDIA chip. Die sizes are 204 mm² and 263 mm², respectively, with transistor densities of 65.2M per mm² and 118.3M per mm². The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz, while the NVIDIA card has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the AMD card and 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective for the NVIDIA card.

Memory capacity differs at 8 GB of GDDR6 for the AMD card versus 12 GB of GDDR7 for the NVIDIA card. Bus widths are 128 bit and 192 bit, and bandwidth figures are 288.0 GB/s and 672.0 GB/s. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. Pixel rates are 156.2 GPixel/s for the AMD card and 115.8 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA card. Texture rates are 312.3 GTexel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 19.99 TFLOPS for the AMD card and 17.04 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card. FP16 performance is 39.98 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio for the AMD card and 17.04 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio for the NVIDIA card.

Power and physical specifications also differ. The AMD card has a 130 W TDP, while the NVIDIA card has a 60 W TDP. The AMD card is single-slot with a 1x 6-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The NVIDIA card is an IGP with no power connector and no suggested PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for the AMD card and PCIe 5.0 x16 for the NVIDIA card. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1 for the AMD card and portable device dependent for the NVIDIA card. Dimensions are recorded for the AMD card at 241 mm length and 115 mm height, while the NVIDIA card has no recorded dimensions. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 599 USD, and the NVIDIA card has no launch MSRP recorded.