AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pairing, and the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600, however, has two geekbench scores on record: 81528 in OpenCL and 92688 in Vulkan, producing an average benchmark score of 87108. This places the AMD part at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals bracket it closely: the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 sits 0.4% above with an average score of 87445, while the NVIDIA CMP 40HX trails by 1.7% at 85637. On the upper side, the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile leads by 4.4% and the RTX A4500 by 5%.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile shows an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking, with no rivals listed. This indicates that the database currently lacks any measured workload performance for this integrated part. Without recorded scores, a direct numerical comparison between the two products is not possible from the available data. The AMD card's recorded performance establishes it as a mid-to-high tier workstation part, while the Intel part's position remains undefined by measurement.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply at the architectural level. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The chip is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm².

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip based on Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation. Intel fabricates this part on a 3 nm process. The transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown in the database, and no density figure is available. The process node difference is substantial: 6 nm for AMD versus 3 nm for Intel.

Core configurations differ dramatically. The AMD part contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 2 ray tracing cores. The AMD part thus carries 8 times the shading units, 8 times the TMUs, 8 times the ROPs, and 16 times the ray tracing cores. Neither part lists tensor cores.

Clock behavior also contrasts. The AMD card runs at a base clock of 1720 MHz and boosts to 2440 MHz. The Intel integrated GPU runs at a 300 MHz base and boosts to 2500 MHz. The AMD part has a higher base clock by a wide margin, while the Intel part has a slightly higher boost clock by 60 MHz. The Intel part's extremely low base clock is typical of integrated graphics that scale dynamically.

Memory architecture is another fundamental split. The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. The Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, meaning its performance scales with whatever system memory is installed. The AMD card's dedicated memory provides predictable bandwidth, while the Intel part's memory performance is variable.

Power and physical design differ as much as the silicon. The AMD card has a 130 W TDP, is single-slot, requires one 6-pin power connector, and suggests a 300 W power supply. It uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and measures 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Intel part has a 25 W TDP, is an IGP with no power connector, no suggested PSU, and uses an IGP bus interface. Its dimensions are not recorded, and its display outputs are portable device dependent. The AMD card provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Both parts share identical API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card was released on 2023-08-02, while the Intel part has a release date of 2026-04-15. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega; the Intel part's predecessor is the HD Graphics-M.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The AMD card's average benchmark score of 87108 places it between the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 at 87445 (0.4% higher) and the NVIDIA CMP 40HX at 85637 (1.7% lower). The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile and RTX A4500 sit 4.4% and 5% higher respectively.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile have any recorded benchmark results?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmarks for the Intel part, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. Its 50th percentile ranking reflects its middle position among all GPUs, but this is not based on measured scores.

Q: What is the transistor density difference between the two parts?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per mm², based on 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The Intel part's transistor count and die size are both listed as unknown, so no density figure can be computed.

Q: How do the memory systems differ?

A: The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, meaning its memory performance depends on the host system's RAM configuration.

Q: What are the TDP figures for each part?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a 130 W TDP. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a 25 W TDP. The AMD card requires a 300 W suggested power supply and a 6-pin connector, while the Intel IGP needs no power connector.

Q: Which part has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD card has 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 2 ray tracing cores. The AMD card therefore has 16 times the ray tracing hardware of the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two parts:

• Process node: 6 nm (AMD) versus 3 nm (Intel)
• Foundry: TSMC versus Intel
• Transistors: 13,300 million versus unknown
• Die size: 204 mm² versus unknown
• Transistor density: 65.2M / mm² versus null
• Base clock: 1720 MHz versus 300 MHz
• Boost clock: 2440 MHz versus 2500 MHz
• Memory clock: 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus system shared
• Memory size: 8 GB versus system shared
• Memory type: GDDR6 versus system shared
• Bus width: 128 bit versus system shared
• Bandwidth: 288.0 GB/s versus system dependent
• Shading units: 2048 versus 256
• TMUs: 128 versus 16
• ROPs: 64 versus 8
• RT cores: 32 versus 2
• Pixel rate: 156.2 GPixel/s versus 20.00 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 312.3 GTexel/s versus 40.00 GTexel/s
• FP32: 19.99 TFLOPS versus 1,280.0 GFLOPS (1.28 TFLOPS)
• FP16: 39.98 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 2.560 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 130 W versus 25 W
• Slot width: Single-slot versus IGP
• Power connectors: 1x 6-pin versus none
• Suggested PSU: 300 W versus null
• Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 versus IGP
• Display outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 versus portable device dependent
• Dimensions: 241 mm length, 115 mm height versus null
• Release date: 2023-08-02 versus 2026-04-15
• Predecessor: Radeon Pro Vega versus HD Graphics-M
• Launch MSRP: 599 USD versus null
• Benchmark scores: geekbench_opencl 81528, geekbench_vulkan 92688 versus none
• Percentile: 93rd versus 50th
• Average benchmark score: 87108 versus 0

Identical specifications include DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4, and production status of Active.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in every measured or quantified category in the database. Its FP32 throughput of 19.99 TFLOPS is over 15 times the Intel part's 1,280.0 GFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 156.2 GPixel/s is 7.8 times the Intel part's 20.00 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 312.3 GTexel/s is 7.8 times the Intel part's 40.00 GTexel/s. Its FP16 throughput of 39.98 TFLOPS dwarfs the Intel part's 2.560 TFLOPS.

The AMD card's 288.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth provides consistent memory performance, whereas the Intel part's system dependent bandwidth cannot guarantee any particular throughput. The AMD card's 8 GB GDDR6 allocation is fixed and dedicated, while the Intel part shares system memory with the CPU and other components.

The AMD card's 32 ray tracing cores versus the Intel part's 2 suggests substantially higher ray tracing throughput, though no ray tracing benchmark scores are available in the database. The AMD card also carries 8 times the shading units, TMUs, and ROPs of the Intel part.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile wins in efficiency-related specifications. Its 25 W TDP is 105 W lower than the AMD card's 130 W TDP. It requires no power connector and no suggested PSU, making it suitable for systems without dedicated power delivery. Its 3 nm process node is two generations ahead of the AMD card's 6 nm node, though the database does not provide transistor counts to assess the density advantage. Its boost clock of 2500 MHz is 60 MHz higher than the AMD card's 2440 MHz boost, though the base clock is far lower.

The Intel part's integrated nature means it occupies no slot space, has no length or height dimensions, and uses a portable device dependent display configuration. This positions it for thin-and-light systems where the AMD card's 241 mm length and single-slot footprint would not fit.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation of use cases. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is a dedicated workstation GPU with measured performance at the 93rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its recorded geekbench scores of 81528 in OpenCL and 92688 in Vulkan, averaging 87108, place it within 5% of several NVIDIA workstation parts. Its 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 288.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth, and 32 ray tracing cores make it suitable for compute-heavy and graphics-intensive workloads where consistent, predictable performance is required. Its 130 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU indicate a system with dedicated power delivery.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no measured benchmarks in the database, so its actual performance cannot be quantified. Its specifications show an integrated part with 25 W TDP, no power connector, and system dependent memory. Its 256 shading units and 2 ray tracing cores place it in a fundamentally different performance class than the AMD card's 2048 shading units and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part's 3 nm process and 2500 MHz boost clock suggest it may offer competitive efficiency for its class, but the database provides no performance data to confirm this.

For users needing a discrete workstation GPU with verified benchmark results, the database points to the AMD Radeon PRO W7600. For systems requiring an integrated graphics solution with minimal power draw and no dedicated memory, the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile fits that role, though its performance remains unmeasured. The AMD card's launch MSRP is 599 USD. The two parts target different segments, and the data supports choosing based on the workload requirements and system constraints rather than direct competition.