AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between these two graphics solutions. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 delivers an average benchmark score of 87,108, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, giving it an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 scores 81,528 points. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 92,688 points. These figures stand without any comparable measurements for the Intel part, as the database contains no benchmark entries for it.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 sits among a tight cluster of professional and workstation GPUs. It trails the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 by 0.4 percent, with that rival posting an average score of 87,445. It leads the NVIDIA CMP 40HX by 1.7 percent, which records 85,637. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile sits 4.4 percent ahead at 91,134, and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 leads by 5 percent at 91,671. These deltas confirm that the AMD card competes directly with established workstation offerings rather than being an outlier in either direction.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, by contrast, has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark results to compare. Its 50th percentile placement reflects a mid-pack standing among all GPUs, but without measured scores, the database cannot quantify its position relative to the AMD part.

The performance difference in raw compute is substantial. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 delivers 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile delivers 588.8 GFLOPS. That represents a difference of more than 33 times in raw floating-point capability. The gap in pixel processing is similarly wide: 156.2 GPixel/s versus 9.2 GPixel/s, a factor of roughly 17. Texture throughput shows 312.3 GTexel/s against 18.4 GTexel/s, a factor of about 17 as well.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has an average benchmark score of 87,108. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, resulting in an average of 0.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It trails the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 by 0.4 percent, leads the NVIDIA CMP 40HX by 1.7 percent, trails the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile by 4.4 percent, and trails the NVIDIA RTX A4500 by 5 percent.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W and requires a 300 W suggested power supply, using a single 6-pin power connector. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W and uses no power connectors.

Q: Which GPU supports more display outputs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile's display outputs are portable device dependent.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon PRO W7600?

A: Its launch MSRP is 599 USD. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in every measurable performance category. Its 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units provide the hardware foundation for its dominant scores. The 32 ray tracing cores add dedicated acceleration for workloads that use DirectX 12 Ultimate features. The GPU posts 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.98 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), making it suitable for compute-heavy professional applications.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 25 W TDP compares to 130 W for the AMD card, a fivefold difference in power draw. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and no slot width, designed for portable devices. Its 3 nm process node, manufactured by Intel, contrasts with the 6 nm TSMC node of the AMD part. The Intel GPU uses system shared memory, eliminating the need for dedicated VRAM and simplifying system design.

For ray tracing workloads, the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 32 dedicated RT cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a single RT core. The AMD card also supports a 128-bit memory bus with 288.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth, while the Intel part relies entirely on system memory with bandwidth that the database lists as system dependent.

The AMD card's 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs make it suitable for multi-monitor professional setups. The Intel part's display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning its connectivity options depend entirely on the host laptop or handheld device.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm Intel process with unknown transistor count and die size.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz, with memory speed listed as system shared.

Memory configurations are fundamentally different. The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth.

Compute resources show a wide gap. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. The Intel part has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 1 RT core. Neither GPU has tensor cores listed.

Physical specifications also diverge. The AMD card is single-slot, 241 mm or 9.5 inches long and 115 mm or 4.5 inches high, using a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and a 1x 6-pin power connector. The Intel part is an IGP with no dimensions, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The AMD card has a 130 W TDP; the Intel part has a 25 W TDP.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card was released on 2023-08-02, while the Intel part has a release date of 2026-04-15. The AMD card lists the Radeon Pro Vega as its predecessor, while the Intel part lists HD Graphics-M as its predecessor.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture, a discrete GPU design manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. Its codename is Hotpink Bonefish, and it belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The chip integrates 13,300 million transistors across a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, an integrated GPU design manufactured by Intel on a 3 nm process. Its chip is Wildcat Lake, belonging to the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation. The database does not list transistor count, die size, or transistor density for this part.

The AMD architecture dedicates substantial silicon to parallel compute. Its 2048 shading units process FP32 workloads at 19.99 TFLOPS and FP16 at 39.98 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The 32 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing. The 128 TMUs and 64 ROPs support texture and pixel processing at rates of 312.3 GTexel/s and 156.2 GPixel/s respectively.

The Intel architecture operates with far fewer resources. Its 128 shading units deliver 588.8 GFLOPS FP32 and 1,177.6 GFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The single RT core provides minimal ray tracing capability. The 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs yield 18.4 GTexel/s and 9.2 GPixel/s.

Memory architecture differs by design philosophy. The AMD card uses dedicated GDDR6 with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, isolating graphics memory from the rest of the system. The Intel part shares system memory, which simplifies the host device design but makes bandwidth dependent on the system's memory configuration.

The AMD card's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides a direct connection to the host system, while the Intel IGP communicates through the processor's integrated memory and display paths. Both support the same API versions, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the AMD card's larger compute and memory resources give it more headroom for demanding workloads.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the clear choice for compute-heavy professional workloads. Its average benchmark score of 87,108 places it in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are all NVIDIA workstation parts within a 5 percent range. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth supports large datasets, and the 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs enable multi-monitor configurations. The 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 32 RT cores provide substantial compute resources for rendering, simulation, and machine learning inference tasks.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile serves an entirely different purpose. With a 25 W TDP and no power connectors, it fits into portable devices where power efficiency matters more than raw performance. Its system shared memory eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM, and its IGP form factor requires no slot space. The 3 nm process node represents a modern manufacturing approach, and the Xe3-LPG architecture targets integrated use cases rather than discrete workstation performance.

The database contains no benchmark results for the Intel part, so direct performance comparisons rely on specifications. Those specifications show a 33-fold difference in FP32 throughput, a 17-fold difference in pixel rate, and a 17-fold difference in texture rate in favor of the AMD card. The AMD card also leads in memory bandwidth by a wide margin, though the Intel part's system dependent bandwidth makes a direct comparison impossible.

For users selecting a discrete workstation GPU, the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 delivers verified performance within 5 percent of NVIDIA RTX A4500-class parts. For users integrating graphics into a portable device, the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile offers a low-power integrated solution with modern API support. The two GPUs target different markets, and the recorded data supports the AMD card for professional graphics workloads while the Intel part serves power-constrained mobile designs.