AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and the Intel Arc G3. The AMD part has two benchmark entries in the database: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 81528 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 92688. These combine for an average benchmark score of 87108, placing the card at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs in the database.

The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark entries at all. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it sits at the 50th percentile. This means there is no measured performance data for the Intel part that can be compared directly against the AMD card. The absence of scores for the Arc G3 is itself informative: any quantitative comparison between these two products must rely entirely on the AMD card’s recorded results and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600’s nearest rivals in the database are all NVIDIA professional or mining cards. The NVIDIA Quadro GP100 posts an average score of 87445, which is 0.4% higher than the W7600. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX scores 85637, putting it 1.7% below the W7600. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile scores 91134, which is 4.4% above the W7600, and the desktop RTX A4500 scores 91671, 5.0% above. These deltas show the W7600 performing in a tight band around the Quadro GP100 and CMP 40HX, while trailing the two RTX A4500 variants by roughly 4 to 5 percentage points.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two parts is substantial. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation (Navi III Series). The process node is 6 nm, produced at TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation for Panther Lake. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, and no transistor density figure is recorded.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of just 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD card’s memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Intel part uses system shared memory, with the memory clock listed as System Shared and bandwidth described as System Dependent.

Compute resources are heavily in AMD’s favor. The W7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc G3 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. These figures mean the AMD card has 60% more shading units, 3.2 times the TMUs, 3.2 times the ROPs, and 3.2 times the ray tracing cores.

Pixel and texture throughput follow directly. The W7600 delivers 156.2 GPixel/s and 312.3 GTexel/s. The Arc G3 delivers 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. In floating point, the AMD card reaches 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.98 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The Intel part reaches 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The AMD card is roughly 3.25 times faster in both FP32 and FP16 throughput.

Power and physical design diverge completely. The W7600 has a TDP of 130 W, is a single-slot card, uses one 6-pin power connector, and suggests a 300 W power supply. It measures 241 mm in length (9.5 inches) and 115 mm in height (4.5 inches). The Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 W, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. Its dimensions are not recorded. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8; the Intel part is an IGP with no bus interface beyond that designation.

Display outputs also differ. The W7600 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1. The Arc G3’s display outputs are described as Portable Device Dependent, reflecting its integration into a mobile processor package.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has tensor cores listed. The AMD card’s production status is Active, and the Intel part is also Active. The release dates are far apart: the W7600 launched on 2023-08-02, while the Arc G3 is dated 2026-05-31.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is a discrete workstation GPU with measured benchmark scores at the 93rd percentile. The Intel Arc G3 is an integrated GPU with no recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile placement, which the database effectively treats as a neutral midpoint due to the absence of results.

For raw compute, the AMD card delivers 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Intel part. That is a 3.25x advantage in the most directly comparable metric. The W7600 also has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Arc G3 relies on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. Any workload that saturates memory bandwidth will strongly favor the discrete card.

The power envelope tells the opposite story. The Arc G3 draws 25 W, which is 105 W less than the W7600’s 130 W TDP. The Intel part requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU rating, making it suitable for compact, low-power mobile devices. The AMD card needs a 6-pin connector and a 300 W PSU recommendation.

The choice depends on the use case. For a workstation with room for a single-slot card, a PCIe 4.0 x8 slot, and a 300 W PSU, the W7600 offers measured performance and a 93rd percentile standing. For an ultraportable or integrated system where power draw and physical space are the constraints, the Arc G3 fits where a discrete card cannot. The database contains no evidence that the Arc G3 can match the W7600 in any compute benchmark, because no such data exists.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | Intel Arc G3 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | Panther Lake |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe3-LPG |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) |

| Process node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Die size | 204 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 65.2M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 1720 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2440 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Memory size | 8 GB | System Shared |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading units | 2048 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 128 | 40 |

| ROPs | 64 | 20 |

| RT cores | 32 | 10 |

| Pixel rate | 156.2 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 312.3 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 19.99 TFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 39.98 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 130 W | 25 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | null |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |

| Display outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| Dimensions | 241 mm x 115 mm | null |

| Release date | 2023-08-02 | 2026-05-31 |

| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | null |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 delivers 19.99 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc G3 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. The AMD card is approximately 3.25 times faster in this metric.

Q: What memory configuration does each use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc G3 uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD card has a 130 W TDP, requires a single 6-pin power connector, and lists a 300 W suggested PSU. The Intel part has a 25 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Are both GPUs compatible with DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and the Intel Arc G3 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Arc G3. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50.

Q: What does the AMD Radeon PRO W7600’s benchmark score mean relative to NVIDIA rivals?

A: The W7600’s average benchmark score is 87108. The NVIDIA Quadro GP100 is 0.4% higher, the NVIDIA CMP 40HX is 1.7% lower, the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile is 4.4% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 is 5.0% higher.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in every measured and spec-based compute category. It has higher shading unit count (2048 versus 1280), more TMUs (128 versus 40), more ROPs (64 versus 20), and more RT cores (32 versus 10). Its pixel rate of 156.2 GPixel/s is 3.25 times the Arc G3’s 48.00 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 312.3 GTexel/s is 3.25 times the Arc G3’s 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 19.99 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 39.98 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS.

The AMD card also wins on memory. Dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed resource, whereas the Intel part’s system shared memory means bandwidth depends entirely on the host system’s memory configuration. The W7600’s 128-bit bus and 18 Gbps effective memory speed are concrete figures; the Arc G3’s memory characteristics are undefined in the database.

The Intel Arc G3 wins on power and integration. Its 25 W TDP is 105 W lower than the AMD card’s 130 W. It requires no power connectors, no slot space, no PSU recommendation, and no external dimensions. The 3 nm Intel process node is smaller than the 6 nm TSMC node, though no transistor or die size data exists for the Intel part to quantify the benefit. The Arc G3’s 300 MHz base clock is dramatically lower, but its 2400 MHz boost clock is close to the AMD card’s 2440 MHz boost. That boost figure indicates the Intel part can reach near-competitive clock speeds when conditions allow, despite the lower base.

For a desktop workstation with a PCIe 4.0 x8 slot and a 300 W PSU, the W7600 is the only one of the two with measured performance data. The Arc G3 is an IGP, meaning it cannot be installed in a discrete slot at all. Any workload involving ray tracing, high pixel fill, or high texture throughput will favor the AMD card by a factor of roughly 3.25 based on the recorded specifications.

For a battery-powered portable device, the Arc G3’s 25 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it the only viable option among these two. The W7600’s 130 W TDP, single-slot footprint, and 6-pin connector exclude it from such systems. The Arc G3’s display outputs being Portable Device Dependent further indicates its design target: integrated graphics for mobile platforms.

The release dates also separate them. The W7600 launched on 2023-08-02, while the Arc G3 is dated 2026-05-31. The Intel part is newer by a wide margin, but the database contains no benchmark results to show whether that newer design translates into competitive performance. The AMD card’s 93rd percentile ranking and measured average score of 87108 stand as the only quantitative performance evidence in this comparison.