AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Arc B770 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear split between these two workstation-class GPUs. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has two benchmark entries in the database: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 81528 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 92688. Its average benchmark score sits at 87108. The Intel Arc B770 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and zero wins in head-to-head comparisons. This absence of data for the Intel part means the comparison relies entirely on the AMD card's measured results and their relationships to the wider GPU landscape.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 achieves a 93rd percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database. That places it above the vast majority of recorded graphics hardware. Its closest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 with an average score of 87445, which is 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD card. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX scores 85637, putting it 1.7 percent behind the Radeon PRO W7600. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile averages 91134, which is 4.4 percent ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 averages 91671, a 5 percent advantage over the AMD card. These deltas show the W7600 sits in a tight competitive cluster, trading blows with professional NVIDIA parts within a narrow performance band.

The Intel Arc B770 has no measured scores, no rival comparisons, and no percentile ranking beyond a default 50th percentile placeholder with a zero average. The database contains no evidence of its compute performance in OpenCL or Vulkan workloads. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and both the wins counter for the AMD card and the Intel card stand at zero. The data cannot confirm any performance lead for either product in direct comparisons because no paired measurements exist.

What the data does show is that the Radeon PRO W7600 delivers measured compute results that place it directly alongside the NVIDIA RTX A4500 family and the Quadro GP100. The 81528 OpenCL score and 92688 Vulkan score indicate strong compute throughput for professional workloads. The Vulkan result runs 13.7 percent higher than the OpenCL result on the same card, suggesting the architecture performs favorably under Vulkan's lower-level API access. The average score of 87108 sits nearly equidistant between the CMP 40HX below it and the Quadro GP100 above it, confirming the W7600 occupies a specific performance tier rather than an outlier position.

The Verdict

The data points to one straightforward conclusion: the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the only product in this comparison with recorded performance evidence. It delivers measured OpenCL and Vulkan scores that rank it in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 87108. The Intel Arc B770 has zero recorded benchmarks, a zero average score, and no rival data to establish any performance position. Any decision between these two cards based on the database favors the AMD part because it has verifiable results while the Intel part has none.

The Radeon PRO W7600's measured performance places it within 5 percent of the NVIDIA RTX A4500 and within 0.4 percent of the NVIDIA Quadro GP100. That positioning confirms it competes with established professional workstation cards. The Intel Arc B770 cannot be positioned against those same rivals because the database contains no scores for it. The percentile ranking of 50 for the Intel card is a placeholder value, not a measured outcome, and should not be interpreted as a performance indicator.

Users requiring immediate, confirmed compute performance from recorded data should select the AMD Radeon PRO W7600. Its 81528 OpenCL score and 92688 Vulkan score provide concrete evidence of capability. The Intel Arc B770's lack of any benchmark entries means no performance claim can be substantiated from the database at this time. The verdict from the recorded measurements is unambiguous: the AMD card has demonstrated performance, the Intel card has not.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, implementing the RDNA 3.0 architecture under the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel Arc B770 uses the BMG-G31 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, implementing the Xe2-HPG architecture. It belongs to the Battlemage generation, specifically the Arc 7 series, with its predecessor listed as Alchemist. The Intel die measures 368 mm², which is 164 mm² larger than the AMD die, though Intel's transistor count is listed as unknown, so no density comparison is possible.

The AMD card features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel card doubles those base counts: 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. It also includes 32 ray tracing cores, matching the AMD count exactly. Neither card lists tensor cores in the database. The AMD card's pixel rate is 156.2 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 312.3 GTexel/s. The Intel card's pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, nearly double the AMD figures in both cases.

The FP32 compute figures tell a different story. The AMD card delivers 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel card delivers 19.66 TFLOPS. The AMD card holds a 1.7 percent advantage despite having half the shading units. For FP16, the AMD card delivers 39.98 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while the Intel card delivers 39.32 TFLOPS at the same 2:1 ratio. Again, the AMD card leads by a narrow margin. This suggests the AMD architecture extracts more compute throughput per shading unit than the Intel design, or the clock differences compensate for the unit disparity.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz. The Intel Arc B770 has a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The Intel card runs 380 MHz higher at base but 40 MHz lower at boost. Memory configurations diverge significantly. The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. The Intel card has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 2000 MHz, translating to 16 Gbps effective. The Intel card offers double the capacity, double the bus width, and 77.8 percent more bandwidth, though at slightly lower effective memory speed.

Power specifications differ as well. The AMD card has a TDP of 130 W, uses a single 6 pin power connector, and requires a 300 W suggested power supply. It is a single slot card. The Intel card has a TDP of 225 W, uses one 6 pin and one 8 pin power connector, and requires a 550 W suggested power supply. It is a dual slot card. The Intel card consumes 95 W more power and demands a substantially larger power supply. The AMD card measures 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height, while the Intel card has no dimensions recorded in the database.

The bus interface differs: the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Intel card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. That gives the Intel card twice the PCIe lane bandwidth for host communication. Display outputs also differ. The AMD card provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1. The Intel card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The AMD card has a release date of August 2, 2023, and a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The Intel card has a release date of December 31, 2025, and no launch MSRP recorded. The AMD card lists its predecessor as Radeon Pro Vega and its production status as Active. The Intel card lists its predecessor as Alchemist and has no production status recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher measured benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has recorded Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 81528 and 92688 respectively, with an average benchmark score of 87108. The Intel Arc B770 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average of 0.

Q: How does the Radeon PRO W7600 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD card sits 0.4 percent behind the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, 1.7 percent ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 40HX, 4.4 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile, and 5 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX A4500 in average benchmark scores.

Q: What are the memory capacity and bandwidth differences?

A: The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card provides double the capacity and 77.8 percent more bandwidth.

Q: How do FP32 compute performances compare?

A: The AMD card delivers 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel card delivers 19.66 TFLOPS. The AMD card leads by approximately 1.7 percent despite having half the shading units (2048 versus 4096).

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD card has a 130 W TDP, uses a single 6 pin connector, and requires a 300 W suggested power supply. The Intel card has a 225 W TDP, uses one 6 pin and one 8 pin connector, and requires a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The AMD card has a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The Intel card's transistor count and density are listed as unknown, though its die size is 368 mm².

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in every category where recorded data exists. It has measured benchmark scores in both OpenCL and Vulkan, giving it a confirmed performance position in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs. Its FP32 compute of 19.99 TFLOPS edges out the Intel card's 19.66 TFLOPS. Its FP16 compute of 39.98 TFLOPS also leads the Intel card's 39.32 TFLOPS. The AMD card achieves these results with a 130 W TDP, a single slot cooler, and a single 6 pin power connector, making it the more power-efficient option based on the recorded specifications. Its smaller 204 mm² die and 6 nm process node also suggest lower manufacturing complexity compared to the Intel card's 368 mm² die on 5 nm.

The AMD card wins on power efficiency per the data. It delivers nearly identical FP32 throughput to the Intel card while consuming 95 W less power. It also wins on physical footprint, occupying a single slot versus the Intel card's dual slot design. The AMD card's 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs provide more display connectivity than the Intel card's combination of one HDMI and three DisplayPort outputs.

The Intel Arc B770 wins in areas where its specifications exceed the AMD card. It offers 16 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 256 bit bus versus 128 bit, and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. It doubles the shading units, texture mapping units, and raster operation units. Its pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s both approximately double the AMD card's figures. The Intel card also uses PCIe 4.0 x16 versus the AMD card's PCIe 4.0 x8, providing more host bandwidth. Its base clock of 2100 MHz exceeds the AMD card's 1720 MHz base clock.

The Intel card has a later release date of December 31, 2025, and lists Alchemist as its predecessor, indicating it represents a newer generation in Intel's product line. However, without any recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm whether these specification advantages translate into real performance wins. The Intel card's 16 GB memory and double bandwidth make it the apparent choice for memory-heavy workloads based on specifications alone, but the absence of measured data leaves that conclusion unverified. The AMD card's recorded wins in compute benchmarks and its established position among professional rivals give it the only confirmed performance victories in this comparison.