AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single direct head-to-head benchmark result between the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE: Geekbench OpenCL. In this test, the RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109 points, while the PRO W7600 scores 81,528 points. The delta is 1.9% in favor of the RX 7650 GRE, a narrow margin that places both cards within the same performance tier for compute workloads.

The RX 7650 GRE also holds an additional benchmark entry not shared by the PRO W7600: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 points. This result is not directly comparable to any PRO W7600 measurement, but it provides context for the RX 7650 GRE's gaming-oriented feature set.

When positioned against the broader GPU landscape, the two cards diverge noticeably in percentile ranking. The PRO W7600 sits at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the RX 7650 GRE ranks at the 83rd percentile. This percentile gap reflects the PRO W7600's higher average benchmark score of 87,108 points compared to the RX 7650 GRE's 42,723 points. The difference in average scores is substantial, but it is important to note that the averages are drawn from different benchmark sets, with the PRO W7600's average dominated by two strong Geekbench results and the RX 7650 GRE's average pulled down by the lower 3DMark Steel Nomad score.

The nearest rival data reinforces the positioning of each card. The PRO W7600's closest competitors include the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 (average score 87,445, delta -0.4%), the NVIDIA CMP 40HX (85,637, delta 1.7%), the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile (91,134, delta -4.4%), and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 (91,671, delta -5%). The RX 7650 GRE's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43,223, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43,268, delta -1.3%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43,301, delta -1.3%). These rival sets show that the PRO W7600 competes in a higher average-score bracket, while the RX 7650 GRE sits in a lower one.

Architecture Differences

Both cards share the same underlying silicon: the Navi 33 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, with the Hotpink Bonefish codename and RDNA 3.0 architecture. Transistor count is identical at 13,300 million, and the die size is the same at 204 mm², yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². Both cards use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The shading unit count, texture mapping units, and raster operation units are also identical: 2,048 shaders, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Both cards feature 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores.

The architectural divergence begins with clock speeds. The PRO W7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz, with no game clock listed. The RX 7650 GRE has the same base clock of 1720 MHz but a higher boost clock of 2695 MHz, plus a game clock of 2350 MHz. This 255 MHz boost advantage translates into higher fill rates and compute throughput for the RX 7650 GRE. The pixel rate for the PRO W7600 is 156.2 GPixel/s, while the RX 7650 GRE reaches 172.5 GPixel/s. Texture rates follow the same pattern: 312.3 GTexel/s for the PRO W7600 versus 345.0 GTexel/s for the RX 7650 GRE.

Peak FP32 performance is 19.99 TFLOPS for the PRO W7600 and 22.08 TFLOPS for the RX 7650 GRE. The FP16 numbers differ in ratio: the PRO W7600 delivers 39.98 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. This indicates that the PRO W7600 has a dedicated path for accelerated FP16 compute, whereas the RX 7650 GRE processes FP16 at the same rate as FP32.

The cards differ in their power and physical design. The PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W, is single-slot, uses a 1x 6-pin power connector, and recommends a 300 W PSU. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, is dual-slot, uses a 1x 8-pin power connector, and recommends a 450 W PSU. The PRO W7600 measures 241 mm in length (9.5 inches), while the RX 7650 GRE is shorter at 204 mm (8 inches). Both are 115 mm in height (4.5 inches). Display outputs differ: the PRO W7600 offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the RX 7650 GRE offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. Both use a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7650 GRE wins the only shared benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, by 1.9%. This small margin, combined with its higher boost clock and peak compute rates, indicates that the RX 7650 GRE is the faster card in raw compute tasks that scale with clock speed. Its higher pixel rate (172.5 GPixel/s vs. 156.2 GPixel/s) and texture rate (345.0 GTexel/s vs. 312.3 GTexel/s) also suggest an edge in rasterization-heavy workloads. The RX 7650 GRE's additional 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 points is a separate data point that further supports its gaming-oriented capabilities.

The PRO W7600, despite losing the sole head-to-head test, holds advantages that matter in professional contexts. Its FP16 throughput of 39.98 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio is nearly double that of the RX 7650 GRE's 22.08 TFLOPS at 1:1. This makes the PRO W7600 substantially faster for workloads that leverage packed FP16 operations, such as certain machine learning inference tasks or image processing pipelines. The PRO W7600 also commands a higher percentile rank (93rd vs. 83rd) and a higher average benchmark score (87,108 vs. 42,723), though the latter comparison is complicated by differing test suites.

The power profile favors the PRO W7600. Its 130 W TDP is 40 W lower than the RX 7650 GRE's 170 W, and it uses a single 6-pin connector instead of an 8-pin, with a recommended PSU of 300 W versus 450 W. This makes the PRO W7600 easier to integrate into compact or power-constrained systems. The single-slot form factor also differentiates it from the RX 7650 GRE's dual-slot design, which is relevant for dense multi-GPU configurations.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a boost clock of 2695 MHz, compared to the AMD Radeon PRO W7600's boost clock of 2440 MHz. Both share a base clock of 1720 MHz.

Q: What is the performance difference in the shared Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109 points, while the PRO W7600 scores 81,528 points. The RX 7650 GRE wins by 1.9%.

Q: Do the cards have the same memory configuration?

A: Yes. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: How do their FP16 compute rates compare?

A: The PRO W7600 delivers 39.98 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The PRO W7600 has a significant advantage in packed FP16 workloads.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W, uses a 1x 6-pin power connector, and recommends a 300 W PSU. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, uses a 1x 8-pin power connector, and recommends a 450 W PSU.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The PRO W7600 ranks at the 93rd percentile, while the RX 7650 GRE ranks at the 83rd percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE |

|---|---|---|

| Boost clock | 2440 MHz | 2695 MHz |

| Game clock | Not listed | 2350 MHz |

| Pixel rate | 156.2 GPixel/s | 172.5 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 312.3 GTexel/s | 345.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 performance | 19.99 TFLOPS | 22.08 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 39.98 TFLOPS (2:1) | 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 130 W | 170 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 450 W |

| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) |

| Display outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Release date | 2023-08-02 | 2025-02-06 |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | Navi III (RX 7000) |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | Navi II |

| Successor | None | Navi IV |

| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | 279 USD |

The RX 7650 GRE also includes a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark score of 2,336 points, which the PRO W7600 lacks. Both cards share the same process node (6 nm), foundry (TSMC), transistor count (13,300 million), die size (204 mm²), memory configuration (8 GB GDDR6, 128-bit, 288.0 GB/s), shading units (2,048), TMUs (128), ROPs (64), ray tracing cores (32), base clock (1720 MHz), memory clock (2250 MHz), bus interface (PCIe 4.0 x8), API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4), and dimensions height (115 mm).