GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7500

CORE STATE Navi 33

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1700 MHz

TDP 70 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

GPU

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

CORE STATE DG1

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

58,213

14,315

geekbench_vulkan

68,634

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

125

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

200

N/A

passmark_g2d

1,174

N/A

passmark_g3d

13,368

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

5,910

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Analyzing the test figures for AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (AMD) and Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics, a definite pattern develops. AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (AMD) consistently produces stronger performance in every testing. The benchmark superiority spans from substantial to outstanding based on the particular title. Such steadiness points to inherent architectural improvements. Consumers prioritizing rendering performance should take note.

Game performance tests across different titles repeatedly advantage AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (AMD). From esports titles to heavy games, AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (AMD) maintains its edge. This frame rate reliability in diverse workloads proves underlying technical improvements. Players should count on strong performance independent of game type. The versatility is notable.

For buyers weighing a purchase decision, AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (AMD) emerges as the advised choice. The steady gaming lead over Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics positions it the smarter purchase for performance-oriented builders. Weigh your individual needs, but the evidence leads toward AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (AMD). Form an smart choice. The frame rate difference is significant and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO W7500

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,792

768 -57.1%

Shaders

1,792

768 -57.1%

TMUs

112

48 -57.1%

ROPs

24 -62.5%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1500 MHz

300 MHz

Boost Clock

1700 MHz

1650 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

2133 MHz 4.3 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

4,096 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

LPDDR4X

Memory Bus

128 bit

Bandwidth

256.0 GB/s

68.26 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

2 MB

1024 KB

L3 Cache

32 MB

16 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

108.8 GPixel/s

39.60 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

190.4 GTexel/s

79.20 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

12.19 TFLOPS

2.534 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

380.8 GFLOPS (1:32)

633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

24.37 TFLOPS (2:1)

5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Matrix Cores

—

Power

TDP

70 W

25 W

TDP (W)

25 -64.3%

Suggested PSU

250 W

200 W

Power Connectors

None

—

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Generation 12.1

GPU Name

Navi 33

DG1

Codename

Hotpink Bonefish

—

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)

Xe Graphics

Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Transistors

13,300 million

—

Die Size

204 mm²

95 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Density

65.2M / mm²

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

Single-slot

IGP

Length

216 mm 8.5 inches

—

Height

115 mm 4.5 inches

—

Outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Launch Price

429 USD

—

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

Graphics

Successor

—

Alchemist

View Radeon PRO W7500 Details View Iris Xe MAX Graphics Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7500

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons