AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Arc B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between these two graphics solutions. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 holds an average benchmark score of 16415, while the Intel Arc B370 records an average of 1184. This difference places the AMD card in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, whereas the Intel part sits in the 5th percentile. The delta between the two is substantial, with the AMD part delivering roughly 13.9 times the average score of the Intel solution.

Looking at the specific workloads covered in the database, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 shows results across multiple test suites. Its Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 58213, and its Geekbench Vulkan score climbs to 68634. In PassMark testing, the card posts 13368 in G3D, 5910 in GPU compute, 1174 in G2D, and legacy DirectX scores of 200 in DirectX 9, 125 in DirectX 11, 65 in DirectX 10, and 46 in DirectX 12. The Intel Arc B370, by contrast, has only one recorded benchmark result: 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

The Intel Arc B370's nearest rivals in the database are older discrete parts such as the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 1186 and is 0.2% ahead, and the ATI Radeon HD 5770, which scores 1190 and is 0.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500, meanwhile, competes with a much higher tier of hardware. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell with an average score of 16408, a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT trails by 0.3% with 16361, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M trails by 0.4% with 16351. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 leads the AMD card by 0.5% with 16504.

The benchmark gap between the two products is not marginal; it is a full performance tier separation. The AMD card's lowest PassMark subscore, 46 in DirectX 12, still reflects a workload-specific result rather than an overall capability statement. The Intel part's single 3DMark run indicates a much lower overall compute and graphics throughput profile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, under the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The chip is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-M generation for Panther Lake platforms. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. The database does not record a transistor count, die size, or density for this part.

The AMD card uses 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation pipelines, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel part carries 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists despite the internal differences.

The AMD card is a discrete solution with a 70 W TDP, a single-slot form factor, no power connectors, and a suggested power supply of 250 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and outputs through 4x DisplayPort 2.1. The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, an IGP slot width, no power connectors, no suggested PSU rating, and an IGP bus interface. Its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins in every recorded benchmark category where data exists for both products. More precisely, it wins in every category where the Intel part has no competing result and in the one category where both have data, the Intel part's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 stands alone, with no comparable AMD result recorded in the head-to-head table.

From a workload perspective, the AMD card shows strength across compute-heavy applications. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 58213 and Vulkan score of 68634 indicate substantial throughput for general purpose GPU compute tasks. PassMark GPU compute at 5910 reinforces this. The legacy DirectX scores, including 200 in DirectX 9 and 125 in DirectX 11, suggest that older graphics workloads run at a reasonable level, though the DirectX 12 score of 46 is notably lower relative to other subscores.

The Intel Arc B370, with its single recorded result, cannot claim a win in any measured category. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 places it near the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770, both of which slightly exceed it. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500's average score of 16415 places it in a completely different competitive bracket, one where the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT.

The use-case split is therefore not about which card wins which workload. It is about capability tiers. The AMD card is positioned for professional and compute-oriented tasks where high throughput matters. The Intel part, as an integrated solution with system-shared memory, is designed for power-constrained mobile or embedded contexts, not for competing with discrete workstation GPUs.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 | Intel Arc B370 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | Panther Lake |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe3-LPG |

| Process node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Die size | 204 mm² | unknown |

| Base clock | 1500 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost clock | 1700 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Memory | 8 GB GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory bus | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading units | 1792 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 112 | 40 |

| ROPs | 64 | 20 |

| Ray tracing cores | 28 | 10 |

| Pixel rate | 108.8 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 190.4 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 70 W | 25 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |

| Display outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | null |

The AMD card has a lower boost clock than the Intel part, 1700 MHz versus 2400 MHz, but its much higher core counts and dedicated memory more than compensate. The Intel part's memory subsystem is entirely system-shared, meaning bandwidth and capacity depend on the host platform. The AMD card provides 8 GB of GDDR6 over a 128 bit bus with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part's memory bandwidth is listed as system dependent.

The AMD card's FP32 throughput of 12.19 TFLOPS is roughly double the Intel part's 6.144 TFLOPS. FP16 follows the same pattern at 24.37 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS, both using a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate and texture rate also favor the AMD card by more than 2x in both cases.

The release dates differ substantially. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 launched on 2023-08-02 with a launch MSRP of 429 USD. The Intel Arc B370 carries a release date of 2026-01-26 and has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has an average benchmark score of 16415, while the Intel Arc B370 has an average of 1184.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370's nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186, which is 0.2% ahead, and the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190, which is 0.5% ahead. The AMD FirePro M2000 trails by 1.4% with a score of 1168.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc B370 has 10.

Q: What process nodes are used for each chip?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a TDP of 70 W. The Intel Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation of roles. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is a discrete workstation GPU with a 59th percentile ranking, an average score of 16415, and a nearest-rival field populated by NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. It delivers 12.19 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 256.0 GB/s of dedicated memory bandwidth, and a 70 W TDP in a single-slot form factor with four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor with a 5th percentile ranking and an average score of 1184. Its nearest rivals are decade-old discrete parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770. It provides 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, relies entirely on system shared memory, and consumes 25 W.

For workloads that require sustained compute throughput, dedicated VRAM, or professional display output capabilities, the AMD card is the only one of the two with the recorded specifications to support such demands. The Intel part's single benchmark result and system-dependent memory make it unsuitable for direct comparison in those categories. The choice between them is not a matter of preference; the recorded measurements place the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 in a different performance class entirely.