AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 are both built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, yet they target completely different segments of the GPU market. The W7500 is a professional workstation card with a 70 W power target, while the RX 7700 is a consumer gaming card with a 200 W power target. The benchmark data reveals a decisive performance gap, with the RX 7700 winning all eight head-to-head comparisons, but the W7500’s strengths lie in its efficiency and professional feature set.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data from the head-to-head comparisons is unequivocal: the AMD Radeon RX 7700 outperforms the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 in every single test. The most significant margin appears in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the RX 7700 scores 2865 points, though the W7500 has no comparable score listed. Looking at the shared benchmarks, the largest percentage gap is in PassMark DirectX 12, where the RX 7700’s score of 96 is 52.1% higher than the W7500’s 46. This suggests the RX 7700 has a particularly strong advantage in modern, low-level graphics APIs.

Compute workloads show a similarly large divide. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 7700 scores 106028, which is 45.1% ahead of the W7500’s 58213. The PassMark GPU Compute test tells a similar story, with the RX 7700’s 10963 score representing a 46.1% lead over the W7500’s 5910. These numbers indicate that the RX 7700 is not just faster for gaming, but also for general-purpose compute tasks.

The gap narrows somewhat in older and simpler benchmarks, but the RX 7700 still wins clearly. In PassMark DirectX 10, the RX 7700’s 92 is 29.3% higher than the W7500’s 65. The PassMark DirectX 11 test shows a 32.8% advantage for the RX 7700, with scores of 186 versus 125. Even in PassMark DirectX 9, a legacy API, the RX 7700’s 261 is 23.4% ahead of the W7500’s 200.

The closest contest is in PassMark G2D, a 2D graphics test. Here, the RX 7700’s 1206 is only 2.7% higher than the W7500’s 1174, suggesting that for basic desktop rendering, the two cards are nearly equivalent. The PassMark G3D score, which is a more comprehensive 3D benchmark, shows a 36.3% lead for the RX 7700, with 20974 versus 13368. Overall, the average benchmark score favors the RX 7700, but the W7500 actually occupies a higher percentile rank among all GPUs, sitting at the 59th percentile versus the RX 7700’s 58th, due to the distribution of scores from other cards.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is significantly faster, scoring 106028 compared to the AMD Radeon PRO W7500’s 58213, a 45.1% difference.

Q: How do the two cards compare in DirectX 12 performance?

A: The RX 7700 leads by a wide margin, with a PassMark DirectX 12 score of 96 versus the W7500’s 46, which is a 52.1% higher score for the RX 7700.

Q: Is the W7500 competitive in any benchmark?

A: The only benchmark where the two are close is PassMark G2D, where the W7500 scores 1174 and the RX 7700 scores 1206, a margin of just 2.7% in favor of the RX 7700.

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark scores?

A: The RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852, while the PRO W7500 has a higher average score of 16415, despite losing every head-to-head test.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 ranks in the 59th percentile, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 ranks in the 58th percentile.

Q: Does the RX 7700 win in compute performance?

A: Yes, the RX 7700’s PassMark GPU Compute score of 10963 is 46.1% higher than the W7500’s 5910.

Architecture Differences

The two cards share the RDNA 3.0 architecture but are built on different chips and process nodes. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 uses the larger Navi 32 chip, built on a more advanced 5 nm process. This process advantage contributes to the RX 7700’s higher transistor density of 81.2M / mm², compared to the W7500’s 65.2M / mm². The RX 7700 packs 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, while the W7500 has 13,300 million transistors on a smaller 204 mm² die.

The compute resources are also substantially different. The RX 7700 features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It also has 40 ray tracing cores. The W7500 is a smaller design, with 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The FP32 compute throughput reflects this: the RX 7700 delivers 25.18 TFLOPS, more than double the W7500’s 12.19 TFLOPS. A notable difference is in FP16 performance; the RX 7700 achieves 25.18 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the W7500 reaches 24.37 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, indicating a different execution strategy for half-precision workloads.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but they differ in their codenames and generations. The W7500 is part of the Radeon Pro Navi line (Navi III Series) with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish," while the RX 7700 belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, codenamed "Wheat Nas." The W7500’s predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, whereas the RX 7700’s predecessor is Navi II.

Specification Differences

The most obvious differences are in power and physical design. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a TDP of 70 W and requires no power connectors, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 has a TDP of 200 W and needs two 8-pin power connectors. The recommended power supply also differs, with the W7500 requiring a 250 W PSU and the RX 7700 needing a 550 W PSU. The W7500 is a single-slot card measuring 216 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The RX 7700 is a dual-slot card, measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width.

Memory configurations are another key differentiator. The W7500 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The RX 7700 doubles this to 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a much higher bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The memory clock speeds also differ, with the W7500 running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) and the RX 7700 at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective). The PCIe interface is different as well: the W7500 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the RX 7700 uses the full PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs vary, with the W7500 offering 4x DisplayPort 2.1 and the RX 7700 providing 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

Clock speeds also favor the RX 7700 significantly. The W7500 has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1700 MHz. The RX 7700 has a base clock of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The pixel rate and texture rate follow suit, with the RX 7700 achieving 236.1 GPixel/s and 393.4 GTexel/s, versus the W7500’s 108.8 GPixel/s and 190.4 GTexel/s. The release dates are far apart, with the W7500 launching on 2023-08-02 and the RX 7700 on 2025-09-17. The W7500 has a launch MSRP of 429 USD.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is clear: the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the superior performer in every single head-to-head test. Its wins range from a modest 2.7% in PassMark G2D to a dominant 52.1% in PassMark DirectX 12. For any workload that relies on raw graphics or compute throughput, the RX 7700 is the stronger choice. The RX 7700’s 16 GB of memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth also provide a substantial advantage in memory-intensive tasks.

However, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 should not be dismissed. Its 70 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it a far more efficient card, suitable for systems with limited power budgets or space constraints, given its single-slot design. The W7500 also has a higher average benchmark score of 16415 and a higher percentile ranking (59th) compared to the RX 7700 (58th), though this is due to the specific composition of their respective competitor pools. The W7500’s professional positioning, with 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and a lower PSU requirement, suggests it is intended for professional multi-display setups where absolute performance is secondary to reliability and efficiency.

Where Each One Wins

For gamers and enthusiasts, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the clear winner. Its massive advantages in DirectX 11 (32.8%), DirectX 12 (52.1%), and G3D (36.3%) benchmarks translate directly to higher frame rates in modern games. The 200 W TDP and dual-slot cooler are acceptable trade-offs for the performance gains. The RX 7700 also wins in compute-heavy applications, with leading scores in Geekbench OpenCL and PassMark GPU Compute, making it suitable for content creation and scientific workloads that are not bound by professional certification requirements.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins in scenarios where power efficiency and physical footprint are paramount. Its 70 W TDP and single-slot design allow it to fit into compact workstations without complex cooling or power delivery. The lack of external power connectors simplifies installation. For tasks like 2D desktop work, the W7500 is nearly as fast as the RX 7700, with only a 2.7% deficit in the G2D test. Its 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support high-resolution multi-monitor configurations, and its professional Radeon Pro lineage, with a predecessor of Radeon Pro Vega, indicates a focus on certified stability. Users who prioritize a low-power, low-profile professional card over raw performance will find the W7500 to be the appropriate choice, while those who need maximum speed will prefer the RX 7700.