AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 Comparison

Both AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 are built on the same underlying RDNA 3.0 architecture and use the identical Navi 33 chip, yet they are tuned for very different purposes. The data shows that the RX 7600 is the clear performance leader in most compute and graphics workloads, while the PRO W7500 holds a significant edge in Vulkan performance and 2D workloads, making the choice between them dependent on your specific software and priorities.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a higher average benchmark score of 16415, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 sits at 15171. This places the PRO W7500 in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the RX 7600's 57th percentile.

Q: How do the two cards compare in raw FP32 performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is substantially higher than the PRO W7500's 12.19 TFLOPS. This difference is also reflected in the FP16 rates, where the RX 7600 achieves 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) versus the PRO W7500's 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1).

Q: Which card wins in Vulkan benchmarks?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins decisively in the Geekbench Vulkan test, scoring 68634 compared to the RX 7600's 34401. This is a 99.5% advantage for the PRO W7500, making it the standout choice for Vulkan-based applications.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a TDP of 70 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W, needs a single 8-pin connector, and calls for a 450 W PSU.

Q: Do both cards support the same modern APIs?

A: Yes, both the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. They also both use a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Q: What is the memory configuration on each card?

A: Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, but the RX 7600 has a higher memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s compared to the PRO W7500's 256.0 GB/s. The memory clock is also higher on the RX 7600 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Architecture Differences

Both cards are fabricated on the same 6 nm process at TSMC, with an identical die size of 204 mm² and a transistor count of 13,300 million, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2M / mm². They share the same Navi 33 chip and the "Hotpink Bonefish" codename, but the internal configurations differ significantly.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is equipped with 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, alongside 28 ray tracing cores. In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 packs more hardware: 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. This higher core count directly contributes to the RX 7600's superior texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s versus the PRO W7500's 190.4 GTexel/s, and a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s versus 108.8 GPixel/s.

Clock speeds are another major divider. The PRO W7500 runs at a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1700 MHz, while the RX 7600 operates at a base of 1720 MHz and boosts to 2655 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz. These higher clocks, combined with more cores, explain the RX 7600's much higher FP32 throughput.

The two cards also differ in physical design and power delivery. The PRO W7500 is a single-slot card measuring 216 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, with no power connector required. The RX 7600 is a dual-slot card that is slightly shorter at 204 mm, but it needs a single 8-pin power connector and has a substantially higher TDP of 165 W compared to the PRO W7500's 70 W. Display outputs also differ: the PRO W7500 offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the RX 7600 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a clear split in strengths, with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 winning 7 of the 9 head-to-head tests, while the PRO W7500 takes 2. The most striking result is in the Geekbench Vulkan test, where the PRO W7500 scores 68634 against the RX 7600's 34401, giving the PRO W7500 a massive 99.5% advantage. This is the single largest performance gap in either direction.

In OpenCL compute, the tables turn completely. The RX 7600 scores 88051 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 33.9% higher than the PRO W7500's 58213. A similar pattern emerges in Passmark GPU Compute, where the RX 7600 hits 8790 versus the PRO W7500's 5910, a 32.8% lead.

The RX 7600 also dominates across all DirectX tests. In Passmark DirectX 11, it scores 172 against 125 for the PRO W7500, a 27.3% advantage. DirectX 10 shows the RX 7600 at 84 versus 65, a 22.6% lead. DirectX 12 results are closer but still favor the RX 7600, with scores of 58 versus 46, a 20.7% difference. Even in the legacy DirectX 9 test, the RX 7600 wins 226 to 200, an 11.5% margin.

The overall Passmark G3D score also goes to the RX 7600, which posts 16634 compared to the PRO W7500's 13368, a 19.6% lead. The only other win for the PRO W7500 comes in the Passmark G2D test, where it scores 1174 against the RX 7600's 984, a 19.3% advantage. This 2D performance win, alongside the Vulkan result, suggests the PRO W7500 has specialized strengths outside of mainstream gaming and compute workloads.

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Radeon RX 7600 as the better choice for general-purpose graphics and compute performance. Its wins in OpenCL, all DirectX versions, and Passmark G3D make it the stronger card for gaming, content creation, and most GPU-accelerated applications. The RX 7600's higher core count, faster clocks, and greater memory bandwidth translate into real-world performance gains across the majority of tested workloads.

However, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is not without its merits. Its 99.5% advantage in Vulkan performance is extraordinary, and its higher average benchmark score (16415 vs 15171) and better percentile ranking (59th vs 57th) indicate that it holds its own in specific professional scenarios. The PRO W7500's significantly lower power draw (70 W vs 165 W), single-slot design, and lack of power connectors make it far easier to integrate into dense or power-constrained systems.

For most users, the RX 7600 is the practical pick. It offers superior performance in nearly every metric that matters for gaming and mainstream computing, and its launch MSRP of 269 USD is lower than the PRO W7500's 429 USD. The PRO W7500 should be considered only if your workflow heavily relies on Vulkan or if the physical and power constraints of a professional environment are paramount. Otherwise, the RX 7600 delivers more performance for less money and power.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 | AMD Radeon RX 7600 |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 1720 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 2655 MHz |

| Game Clock | null | 2250 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 112 | 128 |

| ROPs | 64 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 28 | 32 |

| Pixel Rate | 108.8 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 190.4 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 70 W | 165 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 450 W |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Dimensions (LxHxW) | 216 mm x 115 mm x 20 mm | 204 mm x 115 mm x null |

| Release Date | 2023-08-02 | 2023-05-24 |

| Launch MSRP | 429 USD | 269 USD |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the winner in all compute-heavy and DirectX-based workloads. Its 33.9% lead in OpenCL and 32.8% lead in GPU compute make it the go-to for general-purpose compute tasks, machine learning inference, and rendering. The RX 7600's dominance in DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 tests, with advantages ranging from 11.5% to 27.3%, solidifies its position as the better card for gaming and any DirectX-based professional application. The overall Passmark G3D score, which favors the RX 7600 by 19.6%, confirms its superiority in 3D rendering and graphics-intensive workloads.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins where it counts for specific professional use cases. Its 99.5% Vulkan performance advantage is a major differentiator, making it the preferred choice for Vulkan-based game engines, compute APIs, and professional visualization tools that leverage this API. The PRO W7500 also excels in 2D workloads, with a 19.3% higher Passmark G2D score, which could benefit applications that rely heavily on 2D rendering, UI acceleration, or multi-display desktop environments. Additionally, its lower TDP and single-slot form factor make it the better option for compact workstations, server racks, or systems where power and space are at a premium. The PRO W7500's higher average benchmark score and percentile ranking also suggest it may offer more consistent performance in professional validation suites, even if its peak performance in gaming is lower.