AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits cleanly between these two mobile graphics processors. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M does not win a single recorded head-to-head test. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti claims both available benchmark wins, and the margins are substantial.

Looking at the compute-focused results, the NVIDIA part dominates in Geekbench OpenCL scoring 212,363 against the AMD's 56,140. That is a 73.6% delta in favor of the RTX 5070 Ti, meaning the NVIDIA GPU delivers roughly three and a half times the raw compute throughput in this workload. The gap is not a narrow lead, it is a generational chasm in execution resources.

The Vulkan results tell a similar story. The RTX 5070 Ti posts 225,122 versus the W6600M's 67,652, a 69.9% advantage. Again, the NVIDIA part more than triples the AMD score. For any application that relies on Vulkan for rendering or compute, this is a decisive win for the GeForce product.

Context from the broader database matters here. The Radeon Pro W6600M sits at the 89th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 61,896. The RTX 5070 Ti, despite its dramatic head-to-head wins, sits at the 86th percentile with an average score of 49,957. The percentile difference appears counterintuitive, but it reflects the fact that the RTX 5070 Ti is being compared against a far wider field of desktop and workstation parts, many of which score higher in the specific test suites that contribute to the overall average. The AMD mobile part's average is boosted by its two strong showings in OpenCL and Vulkan, while the NVIDIA card's average includes a broader set of DirectX and Passmark tests where it faces stiffer competition from the full GPU population.

For use-case planning, the data indicates that the RTX 5070 Ti is the clear choice for Vulkan-heavy workloads and OpenCL compute tasks. The W6600M remains competitive only in the sense that it holds a high percentile ranking among all GPUs, but in direct comparison it trails in every recorded test.

The Verdict

The database points to a straightforward conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M in every benchmark where both have recorded scores. The RTX 5070 Ti wins both the OpenCL and Vulkan tests with margins exceeding 69%. Anyone choosing between these two for compute or rendering workloads should select the NVIDIA part without hesitation.

The closest rivals for each card reinforce this assessment. The W6600M's nearest competitors include the AMD Radeon 8050S (0.3% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (2.6% ahead of the W6600M), the Intel Arc Pro A60 (2.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (2.9% ahead). The W6600M is competitive within its own performance tier, trading blows with parts like the RTX 4090 and the Radeon 8050S. But that tier is far below where the RTX 5070 Ti operates.

The RTX 5070 Ti's nearest rivals tell a different story. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 sits 0.1% behind, the Intel Arc A550M trails by 0.4%, the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 2%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT trails by 3.1%. These are all high-end desktop-class parts, and the RTX 5070 Ti is positioned among them in average score. The W6600M, by contrast, is grouped with mid-range and older workstation parts.

For mobile workstations where Vulkan or OpenCL performance is the priority, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only rational pick based on the recorded data. The W6600M would only be appropriate if the workload does not overlap with these benchmark domains, but no such evidence exists in this database entry.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Geekbench OpenCL test provides the first and largest recorded margin. The RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 while the W6600M scores 56,140. The delta is 73.6% in favor of NVIDIA. This test exercises general-purpose GPU compute through the OpenCL framework, and the result reflects the massive difference in shading units (8,960 versus 1,792), texture mapping units (280 versus 112), and raw FP32 throughput (43.94 TFLOPS versus 7.290 TFLOPS). The NVIDIA part has roughly six times the FP32 compute capability, and the benchmark result tracks that resource advantage.

The Geekbench Vulkan test shows a slightly smaller but still enormous gap. The RTX 5070 Ti records 225,122 against the W6600M's 67,652, a 69.9% delta. Vulkan is a low-level graphics and compute API, and the NVIDIA part's superior geometry throughput, texture rate (686.6 GTexel/s versus 227.8 GTexel/s), and pixel rate (235.4 GPixel/s versus 130.2 GPixel/s) all contribute to the result. The RTX 5070 Ti also has 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, while the W6600M has 28 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, which may influence Vulkan workloads that include ray tracing extensions.

The W6600M's best recorded score is its Vulkan result of 67,652. That figure is still less than one third of the RTX 5070 Ti's Vulkan score. The OpenCL result for the AMD part is even weaker relative to the NVIDIA card. Across both tests, the NVIDIA GPU maintains a consistent advantage that suggests no workload overlap where the AMD part could close the gap.

Neither card wins a test that the other does not. The head-to-head table shows zero wins for the W6600M and two wins for the RTX 5070 Ti. The data is unambiguous.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M has a higher average benchmark score at 61,896 compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's 49,957.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti in OpenCL compute?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 73.6% higher than the W6600M's 56,140.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two cards?

A: The W6600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor density?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has a transistor density of 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter, while the W6600M has 46.7 million per square millimeter.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 Ti support tensor cores?

A: Yes, the RTX 5070 Ti includes 280 tensor cores. The W6600M has no tensor core count listed in the database.

Q: What is the release date difference between the two products?

A: The W6600M was released on June 7, 2021, and is marked as end-of-life. The RTX 5070 Ti was released on February 19, 2025, and is listed as active production.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M uses the Navi 23 chip built on RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC.

The transistor counts reflect the generational leap. The W6600M packs 11,060 million transistors into a 237 mm² die, yielding a density of 46.7 million transistors per square millimeter. The RTX 5070 Ti contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, achieving 120.6 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip has more than four times the transistor count and nearly three times the density.

Compute resource allocation differs dramatically. The W6600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has no tensor core counterpart on the AMD side, meaning workloads that leverage tensor operations (such as AI inference and certain rendering features) run exclusively on the RTX 5070 Ti.

FP32 and FP16 throughput also reveal different design philosophies. The W6600M delivers 7.290 TFLOPS FP32 and 14.58 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, favoring workloads that can use packed math. The RTX 5070 Ti delivers 43.94 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, meaning half-precision performance does not exceed single-precision output. The NVIDIA part is still roughly six times faster in FP32 and three times faster in FP16, but the ratio difference affects how each GPU handles mixed-precision workloads.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The W6600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, achieving 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has quadruple the memory bandwidth and double the capacity.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds differ substantially. The W6600M has a base clock of 1224 MHz and a boost clock of 2034 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. Memory clock for the AMD part is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. The NVIDIA part also runs at 1750 MHz but achieves 28 Gbps effective.

Power and physical requirements are not comparable. The W6600M has a TDP of 90 W, is an integrated graphics package (IGP), requires no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU rating. The RTX 5070 Ti has a TDP of 300 W, is a dual-slot card, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and carries a 700 W suggested PSU. Physical dimensions for the NVIDIA card are 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The AMD part lists no dimensions.

Bus interface and display outputs also differ. The W6600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16 while the RTX 5070 Ti uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The AMD card's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," while the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

API support is identical for DirectX (12 Ultimate, 12_2), OpenGL (4.6), and Vulkan (1.4), so software compatibility does not factor into the performance gap. Production status separates them further: the W6600M is end-of-life, while the RTX 5070 Ti is active with a successor already planned in the GeForce 60 series. The RTX 5070 Ti also has a recorded launch MSRP of 749 USD.