AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile Comparison

The benchmark data presents a stark generational and performance-class divide between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16. While both cards occupy similar percentile positions among all GPUs (69th and 68th, respectively), their average benchmark scores tell a more nuanced story of different performance ecosystems. The NVIDIA card averages 23,518 points, while the AMD card averages 23,250 points, a difference of just over 1%. However, this aggregate similarity masks massive divergences in specific workloads, particularly in compute-oriented tests where the NVIDIA card demonstrates overwhelming superiority.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between these two GPUs is limited to two shared benchmark tests, and in both, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile achieves decisive victories. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the NVIDIA card scores 106,022 points against the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16’s 18,268 points. This represents a delta of 480.4% in favor of the NVIDIA chip, meaning it delivers roughly 5.8 times the raw compute performance in this particular workload. The magnitude of this gap is exceptional, indicating that the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is in an entirely different performance tier for general-purpose GPU compute tasks.

The second shared test, Geekbench Vulkan, shows a similar but slightly less extreme outcome. The NVIDIA card scores 100,027 points, while the AMD card manages 21,832 points. The delta here is 358.2%, placing the NVIDIA GPU approximately 4.6 times ahead of the AMD part. Both results underscore a fundamental point: in cross-platform compute benchmarks, the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile’s Ampere architecture with its dedicated tensor cores and higher shading unit count simply overwhelms the older GCN 5.0 design in the Radeon Pro Vega 16.

Beyond these direct comparisons, the data shows the NVIDIA card has a much broader benchmark footprint. The RTX 3070 Ti Mobile scores 17,727 in Passmark G3D, 7,504 in Passmark GPU Compute, and 2,572 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 100,027 is nearly identical to its OpenCL result, suggesting consistent performance across different API environments. In contrast, the AMD card’s highest recorded score is 29,650 in Geekbench Metal, a test for which the NVIDIA card has no equivalent entry. This Metal result is notable because it represents the AMD card’s best-case scenario, yet it still falls far short of the NVIDIA card’s OpenCL and Vulkan numbers.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile has an average benchmark score of 23,518, compared to the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16’s average of 23,250. The NVIDIA card leads by 268 points, a margin of roughly 1.2%.

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA card in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti Mobile scores 106,022 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 18,268. This gives the NVIDIA card a 480.4% advantage, meaning it is nearly six times faster in this specific test.

Q: Does the AMD card win any of the shared benchmarks?

A: No. In the two head-to-head benchmarks (Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan), the NVIDIA card wins both. The AMD card’s wins total is zero, while the NVIDIA card has two wins.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile sits in the 69th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 sits in the 68th percentile. Despite their similar rankings, the benchmark scores within that percentile range differ substantially by workload.

Q: How does the AMD card perform in its best test?

A: The Radeon Pro Vega 16’s strongest result is 29,650 in Geekbench Metal. This is its only benchmark above 22,000 points, and it is a test that has no NVIDIA equivalent in the data, making direct comparison impossible.

Q: What do the nearest rival comparisons show for each card?

A: The NVIDIA card’s closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, which scores 23,628, just 0.5% higher. The AMD card’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA P106-100, which scores 23,249, a 0% difference. Both cards are tightly clustered with their direct competitors.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile wins decisively in every workload where both cards have data. Its 480.4% lead in OpenCL and 358.2% lead in Vulkan indicate that for general-purpose compute, scientific workloads, and Vulkan-based gaming or rendering, the NVIDIA card is the clear choice. The card’s Passmark G3D score of 17,727 further suggests strong performance in DirectX-based gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions and detail settings. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,572 points confirms solid modern API performance.

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 has no benchmark victories against the NVIDIA card, but its data suggests specific niches. Its Geekbench Metal score of 29,650 is its standout result, indicating that in Metal-optimized applications—primarily found in macOS environments—the card can deliver respectable performance. The card’s Vulkan score of 21,832 and OpenCL score of 18,268 are both far lower than the NVIDIA card’s equivalents, but they still represent functional performance for lighter workloads. The AMD card’s lower power envelope and integrated form factor (listed as IGP) suggest it is designed for portability and efficiency rather than raw throughput.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification category. The NVIDIA card features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD card has 4 GB of HBM2 memory on a much wider 1024-bit bus, but its bandwidth is lower at 307.2 GB/s. The NVIDIA card has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, compared to the AMD card’s 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. This represents a 5.75x difference in shading units, explaining the massive compute performance gap.

Clock speeds also differ, with the NVIDIA card boosting to 1,410 MHz versus the AMD card’s 1,190 MHz. The NVIDIA card’s base clock is 915 MHz, while the AMD card’s is 815 MHz. Memory clock rates are similarly divergent: the NVIDIA card runs at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), while the AMD card runs at 1,200 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 115 W, while the AMD card draws 75 W. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the AMD card uses PCIe 3.0 x16. The NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the AMD card supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is generational. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung. It contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The architecture includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. Its FP32 and FP16 performance are both rated at 16.60 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is characteristic of Ampere’s design.

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses the older GCN 5.0 architecture with the Vega 12 chip, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. Its transistor count and die size are not listed in the data, but its shading unit count of 1,024 is a fraction of the NVIDIA card’s. The AMD card has no ray tracing cores or tensor cores, meaning it lacks hardware support for these modern features. Its FP32 performance is 2.437 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 4.874 TFLOPS, showing a 2:1 ratio. The AMD card’s pixel rate is 38.08 GPixel/s and texture rate is 76.16 GTexel/s, compared to the NVIDIA card’s 135.4 GPixel/s and 259.4 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card also has a higher transistor count and smaller process node, reflecting its newer design and manufacturing technology.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous about raw performance: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is in a different league from the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 for compute and graphics workloads. With a 480.4% lead in OpenCL and a 358.2% lead in Vulkan, the NVIDIA card is the only reasonable choice for users who need maximum performance in these areas. Its higher shading unit count, larger memory pool, and support for ray tracing and tensor cores make it a future-proof option for modern games and applications. The NVIDIA card’s 69th percentile ranking, its 2,572-point 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score, and its 17,727-point Passmark G3D score all point to a GPU that can handle demanding tasks with ease.

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, however, is not without its place. Its 68th percentile ranking is nearly identical to the NVIDIA card’s, and its average score of 23,250 is only 1.2% lower. The AMD card’s 29,650-point Geekbench Metal score suggests it is optimized for Apple ecosystem applications, and its 75 W TDP makes it a more power-efficient option for thin-and-light systems. Users who prioritize Metal performance or battery life over raw compute should consider the AMD card, but they must accept its limitations: no ray tracing, no tensor cores, and significantly lower performance in OpenCL and Vulkan. For anyone who needs maximum performance in a mobile workstation or gaming laptop, the NVIDIA card is the clear winner based on every shared benchmark in the data.