GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO V710

CORE STATE Navi 32
VRAM 28 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz
TDP 158 W
BUS WIDTH 224 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T400

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
853
N/A
geekbench_opencl
116,460
17,039
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
15,976

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA T400

Reviewing the test figures for NVIDIA T400 from NVIDIA and AMD Radeon PRO V710 by AMD, the picture of close frame rates develops. Not one card leads steadily in every titles. The alternating of victories indicates underlying balance. Buyers face a genuine choice between them. Both graphics cards deliver capable visual performance.

Based on a engineering standpoint, NVIDIA T400 from NVIDIA and AMD Radeon PRO V710 by AMD possess equivalent hardware. Graphics memory capacity, compute processors, and interface width are virtually aligned. This technical parity accounts for the matched test results. No possesses a significant technical lead. The matchup is fair.

When gaming capability is remarkably comparable, value and capabilities turn the main considerations. Evaluate RT performance quality, reconstruction features, TDP, and driver stability when selecting between NVIDIA T400 from NVIDIA and AMD Radeon PRO V710 by AMD. All these elements can influence the scales. Think completely. This complete perspective counts.

Finally, builders could decide based on ecosystem preference instead of benchmark scores solely. Either NVIDIA T400 from NVIDIA and AMD Radeon PRO V710 by AMD achieve solid visual capability for the given tiers. The selection rests on individual requirements. Either option is solid. Users shouldn't go amiss here.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO V710
T400
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,456
384 -88.9%
Shaders
3,456
384 -88.9%
TMUs
216
24 -88.9%
ROPs
96
16 -83.3%
Compute Units
54
SM Count
6
Clocks
Base Clock
1900 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
28 GB
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
28,672
2,048 -92.9%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
224 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
504.0 GB/s
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
1024 KB
L3 Cache
54 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
27.65 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
864.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
55.30 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
54
Power
TDP
158 W
30 W
TDP (W)
158
30 -81.0%
Suggested PSU
450 W
200 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 32
TU117
Codename
Wheat Nas
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
28,100 million
4,700 million
Die Size
346 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
81.2M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Single-slot
Outputs
No outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ampere
View Radeon PRO V710 Details View T400 Details