GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO V620

CORE STATE Navi 21
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
128,580
30,607
geekbench_vulkan
144,364
28,964
passmark_directx_10
N/A
31
passmark_directx_11
N/A
33
passmark_directx_12
N/A
29
passmark_directx_9
N/A
69
passmark_g2d
N/A
625
passmark_g3d
N/A
5,433
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
2,157

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO V620 vs Intel Arc A310

Analyzing the test results for Intel's Arc A310 and AMD's AMD Radeon PRO V620, the pattern of similar capability unfolds. None of the card excels steadily across every games. The alternating of leads indicates inherent equality. Those confront a actual selection in this matchup. Both cards offer solid rendering capability.

Instead of dwelling on minor benchmark advantages, interested consumers should examine alternative considerations. Power efficiency, acoustics, materials, and support quality usually are important greater than minor frame rate differences. The elements should sway the decision. Weigh further than only frame rates. The entire value proposition counts.

Looking at a engineering standpoint, Intel's Arc A310 and AMD's AMD Radeon PRO V620 have equivalent specifications. Memory amount, processing count, and memory throughput are tightly equivalent. This technical balance accounts for the matched score data. Neither has a substantial engineering lead. This matchup is fair.

In conclusion, the comparison between Intel's Arc A310 and AMD's AMD Radeon PRO V620 concludes in a virtual stalemate. Frame rate variations are minor and improbable to affect real-world sessions. Direct your decision on value, software choices, and personal capability priorities. Each are solid options. This balance is actual.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO V620
A310
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,608
768 -83.3%
Shaders
4,608
768 -83.3%
TMUs
288
32 -88.9%
ROPs
128
16 -87.5%
Compute Units
72
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
32 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
4,096 -87.5%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
124.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L3 Cache
128 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
28.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
20.28 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,267.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
40.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
72
6 -91.7%
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
300 W
30 W
TDP (W)
300
30 -90.0%
Suggested PSU
700 W
200 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 21
DG2-128
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi II Series)
Alchemist (Arc 3)
Process Size
7 nm
6 nm
Transistors
26,800 million
7,200 million
Die Size
520 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.5M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
120 mm 4.7 inches
Outputs
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
Xe Graphics
Successor
Battlemage
View Radeon PRO V620 Details View Arc A310 Details