AMD Radeon Pro Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has a higher average benchmark score of 29,945, while the AMD Radeon Pro Duo records 35,860. Despite the lower average, the Radeon Pro Duo sits at the 80th percentile among all GPUs, whereas the RTX 3070 Ti is at the 75th percentile.
Q: How do the two compare in OpenCL performance?
A: In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 119,718, which is 70% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro Duo's 35,860. The delta percentage is -70, indicating the AMD card trails significantly in this workload.
Q: What are the closest rivals to the AMD Radeon Pro Duo?
A: The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 with an average score of 35,520 (1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile at 35,435 (1.2% higher), the NVIDIA T1000 at 36,289 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 5300M at 36,529 (1.8% lower).
Q: What are the closest rivals to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?
A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile at 29,928 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30,095 (0.5% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti at 29,783 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 at 30,433 (1.6% lower).
Q: Which GPU has more shading units?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has 6,144 shading units, compared to the AMD Radeon Pro Duo's 4,096 shading units. This represents a 50% increase in shading unit count for the NVIDIA card.
Q: What is the memory configuration difference?
A: The AMD Radeon Pro Duo uses 4 GB of HBM memory on a 4096-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti uses 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 608.3 GB/s bandwidth.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Radeon Pro Duo is built on the Capsaicin chip using GCN 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 28 nm process at TSMC. It packs 8,900 million transistors into a 596 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 14.9 million per square millimeter. This dual-GPU design is notable for its era, having been released in April 2016 as part of the Radeon Pro GCN generation.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti uses the GA104 chip with Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. It contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, resulting in a much higher transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. This newer design, released in May 2021, belongs to the GeForce 30 series.
Architecturally, the two cards differ fundamentally in their feature sets. The Radeon Pro Duo has no dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, relying purely on its 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. In contrast, the RTX 3070 Ti includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores alongside its 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs.
The memory subsystems also reveal architectural divergence. The Radeon Pro Duo uses HBM memory with a massive 4096-bit bus, achieving 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 3070 Ti employs GDDR6X on a narrower 256-bit bus but reaches higher bandwidth at 608.3 GB/s. The API support differs as well, with the AMD card supporting DirectX 12 (12_0), while the NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), indicating newer feature levels.
Process technology advances are evident in the specifications. The Radeon Pro Duo's 28 nm node is three generations behind the RTX 3070 Ti's 8 nm node. This translates to nearly triple the transistor density on the newer card. The power delivery also reflects this shift, with the AMD card drawing 350 W through three 8-pin connectors, while the NVIDIA card consumes 290 W via a single 12-pin connector.
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data shows a single head-to-head benchmark, the Geekbench OpenCL test, where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins decisively with a 70% higher score. However, examining the broader benchmark landscape from each card's individual results provides more context.
The AMD Radeon Pro Duo's only recorded benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL at 35,860 points. This places it at the 80th percentile among all GPUs, which is higher than the RTX 3070 Ti's 75th percentile. The Radeon Pro Duo's nearest rivals include professional and mobile GPUs, suggesting its strength lies in compute-oriented workloads where its dual-GPU HBM design can be leveraged.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti shows a much wider benchmark profile. It excels in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 139,541, which is higher than its OpenCL score of 119,718. The PassMark G3D score of 23,356 indicates strong general 3D performance, while the PassMark GPU Compute score of 11,601 shows moderate compute capability. Its DirectX 9 score of 261 and DirectX 10 score of 155 are notably higher than its DirectX 11 score of 192 and DirectX 12 score of 91, which is an unusual pattern.
In terms of raw compute throughput, the RTX 3070 Ti delivers 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16, while the Radeon Pro Duo provides 8.192 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16. The NVIDIA card also has a substantial advantage in pixel rate, at 169.9 GPixel/s versus 64.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate, at 339.8 GTexel/s versus 256.0 GTexel/s.
The Radeon Pro Duo's advantage lies in its higher percentile ranking and its position among professional rivals. Its 80th percentile suggests it competes well in a broad field, whereas the RTX 3070 Ti's 75th percentile places it slightly lower overall despite higher absolute scores in most tests.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification category. The process node is the most fundamental difference: 28 nm for AMD versus 8 nm for NVIDIA. This drives the transistor count difference, with 8,900 million on the AMD side and 17,400 million on the NVIDIA side. Die size reverses this trend, with the AMD card larger at 596 mm² versus 392 mm² for NVIDIA.
Memory capacity differs by 4 GB, with the Radeon Pro Duo offering 4 GB HBM and the RTX 3070 Ti offering 8 GB GDDR6X. Bus width is dramatically different: 4096 bit for AMD versus 256 bit for NVIDIA. Bandwidth favors NVIDIA at 608.3 GB/s compared to 512.0 GB/s for AMD.
Compute unit counts show NVIDIA's advantage in shading units (6,144 vs 4,096), ROPs (96 vs 64), and RT cores (48 vs 0). However, AMD leads in texture mapping units, with 256 versus 192 for NVIDIA. Tensor cores exist only on NVIDIA, with 192 present.
Clock speeds differ as well. The AMD card lists a memory clock of 500 MHz (1000 Mbps effective), while the NVIDIA card has a base clock of 1575 MHz, boost clock of 1770 MHz, and memory clock of 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The AMD card's base and boost clocks are not recorded.
Power requirements favor NVIDIA, with a 290 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU, compared to AMD's 350 W TDP and 750 W suggested PSU. The power connector configurations differ, with AMD requiring three 8-pin connectors and NVIDIA requiring one 12-pin connector.
Bus interface and display outputs also differ. AMD uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while NVIDIA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are identical in count (1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort) but differ in versions: HDMI 1.4a and DisplayPort 1.2 for AMD, versus HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a for NVIDIA.
Physical dimensions are similar in length, with the AMD card at 277 mm and the NVIDIA card at 267 mm, both at 111 mm or 112 mm height, and both dual-slot designs.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The only direct head-to-head benchmark recorded is Geekbench OpenCL. In this test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 119,718, while the AMD Radeon Pro Duo scores 35,860. The delta percentage is -70%, meaning the RTX 3070 Ti outperforms the Radeon Pro Duo by 70% in this specific workload.
This 70% advantage is substantial and consistent with the architectural differences. The RTX 3070 Ti's higher shading unit count, newer process node, and dedicated tensor cores likely contribute to this margin. The Radeon Pro Duo's dual-GPU design may not scale efficiently in OpenCL workloads, potentially explaining its lower score.
Beyond the head-to-head, comparing their individual benchmark suites provides additional context. The RTX 3070 Ti's Geekbench Vulkan score of 139,541 is even higher than its OpenCL score, suggesting the NVIDIA card benefits from Vulkan's lower overhead. The Radeon Pro Duo has no Vulkan benchmark recorded, so no direct comparison is possible.
The PassMark results for the RTX 3070 Ti show a G3D score of 23,356, which is its strongest direct 3D performance metric. The GPU Compute score of 11,601 is roughly half of the G3D score, indicating compute performance lags behind graphics performance on this card.
The Radeon Pro Duo's nearest rival data places it in a competitive field. The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 is only 1% ahead, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 1.2% ahead. The NVIDIA T1000 trails by 1.2%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5300M trails by 1.8%. This clustering suggests the Radeon Pro Duo's OpenCL performance is well-matched to these mid-range and professional cards.
For the RTX 3070 Ti, the nearest rivals are tightly packed. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is 0.1% ahead, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 0.5% behind, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 is 1.6% behind. This tight grouping indicates the RTX 3070 Ti sits at a competitive performance level for its generation.
The Verdict
The benchmark data clearly favors the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in raw performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 70% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro Duo's, and it offers higher compute throughput, pixel rate, and texture rate. The RTX 3070 Ti also has double the memory capacity, higher bandwidth, and a more modern feature set including ray tracing and tensor cores.
The AMD Radeon Pro Duo's case rests on its higher percentile ranking. At the 80th percentile, it outperforms the RTX 3070 Ti's 75th percentile in the overall GPU landscape. This suggests that while the RTX 3070 Ti wins in specific benchmarks, the Radeon Pro Duo may have strengths in workloads not captured by the recorded tests.
For users prioritizing compute performance in OpenCL-based applications, the RTX 3070 Ti is the clear choice based on the data. Its 119,718 OpenCL score dwarfs the Radeon Pro Duo's 35,860, and its nearest rivals confirm it sits in a strong competitive position.
For users who value the Radeon Pro Duo's professional lineage, its 80th percentile ranking and tight competition with the Quadro GV100 and RTX 5070 Ti Mobile suggest it remains relevant in specific professional workflows. However, with only one benchmark recorded, its overall performance profile is less defined than the RTX 3070 Ti's.
The RTX 3070 Ti is the more versatile card, with multiple benchmark records spanning DirectX 9 through 12, Vulkan, OpenCL, and PassMark tests. The Radeon Pro Duo, with its single benchmark and end-of-life status since 2016, appears more specialized.
In practical terms, the RTX 3070 Ti offers superior memory capacity, bandwidth, and compute resources, making it the stronger candidate for most modern workloads. The Radeon Pro Duo's dual-GPU HBM configuration may have advantages in specific legacy or niche applications, but the recorded data does not demonstrate these advantages.
The verdict is straightforward: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins the head-to-head comparison based on the benchmark data, with a 70% advantage in the only direct comparison available. The AMD Radeon Pro Duo remains competitive in percentile ranking, but its absolute performance is significantly lower.