AMD Radeon Pro Duo
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Radeon Pro Duo Specifications
GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD Radeon Pro Duo GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
Pro Duo Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon Pro Duo's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon Pro Duo by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's Radeon Pro Duo Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon Pro Duo's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Radeon Pro Duo by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the Pro Duo, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
Pro Duo Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon Pro Duo against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 3.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Radeon Pro Duo is built on AMD's GCN 3.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Pro Duo will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD Radeon Pro Duo determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon Pro Duo to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Radeon Pro Duo by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon Pro Duo are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon Pro Duo. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Radeon Pro Duo Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon Pro Duo by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
About AMD Radeon Pro Duo
AMD Radeon Pro Duo is an end-of-life, dual-GPU workstation card built on the 28 nm GCN 3.0 architecture, designed around the "Capsaicin" chip with 8,900 million transistors on a 596 mm² die. Its benchmark standing relies on a single OpenCL score, placing it at the 80th percentile of all tested GPUs, a position that reflects its specialized compute focus rather than broad gaming prowess. The data shows a product that was formidable at launch but now sits in a narrow performance band, trading blows with modern mid-range and last-generation high-end parts.
Benchmark Performance
The sole benchmark result available is the Geekbench OpenCL score of 35,860, which serves as the average benchmark score for this card. This figure places the Radeon Pro Duo at the 80th percentile among all GPUs in the database, indicating that it outperforms the majority of tested hardware in compute workloads. However, the nearest rival data reveals a tightly contested field, with the card neither dominating nor being outpaced by a significant margin.
Against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, which scores 35,787, the Radeon Pro Duo leads by a mere 0.2%. This delta is effectively a statistical tie, suggesting that in raw OpenCL compute, the 2016 dual-GPU card can match a 2020 flagship gaming GPU. The AMD Radeon 880M, an integrated graphics solution, scores 35,646, placing it 0.6% behind the Pro Duo; this performance parity is remarkable given the 880M's intended market segment. Conversely, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE scores 36,101, which is 0.7% higher, and the NVIDIA T1000 leads with 36,282, a 1.2% advantage over the Pro Duo.
These deltas, ranging from -1.2% to +0.6%, demonstrate that the Radeon Pro Duo's compute performance is firmly anchored in a mid-tier band. The card does not exhibit a clear win or loss against any listed rival; instead, it sits within a 2% window of performance difference across all four comparisons. This clustering suggests that the dual-GPU configuration provides a compute throughput that is competitive with modern single-GPU solutions, but without the architectural efficiency gains of newer designs. For context, the 8.192 TFLOPS FP32 rating and the 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) capability indicate a balanced compute profile, but the benchmark data shows that this raw throughput translates into a score that modern mid-range parts can match or slightly exceed.
Power and Cooling
The Radeon Pro Duo carries a thermal design power of 350 W, a figure that directly dictates its cooling and power delivery requirements. This TDP is substantial for a dual-GPU card, and the hardware reflects that demand: the card is dual-slot in width and requires three 8-pin power connectors. The suggested power supply rating is 750 W, which provides sufficient headroom for the card's peak draw along with a typical system's other components.
Cooling is handled through a dual-slot design, which is a standard form factor for high-TDP cards of this era. The 350 W TDP means that adequate case airflow is necessary, but the dual-slot cooler is designed to dissipate that heat within a single expansion bay. The physical dimensions are 277 mm in length (10.9 inches) and 111 mm in height (4.4 inches), so case compatibility must be checked against these measurements. The power connector arrangement of three 8-pin inputs is a clear indicator of the card's appetite for electricity, and users must ensure their power supply has the requisite cables and wattage capacity. The data does not specify base or boost clocks, which is notable for power analysis, but the TDP and connector requirements are the primary constraints for system integration. The 750 W PSU recommendation is a hard guideline; going below this rating risks instability under load, especially when considering the rest of the system's draw.
Memory Subsystem
Memory capacity is listed as 4 GB of HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) on a 4096-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock is specified as 500 MHz, which translates to 1000 Mbps effective data rate. This configuration is unusual by modern standards: the capacity is low, but the bus width is extremely wide, which was a hallmark of early HBM implementations.
The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is a significant asset for compute workloads that are memory-bandwidth-bound, such as certain scientific simulations or large dataset processing. However, the 4 GB capacity presents a hard limitation for high-resolution gaming or modern professional workloads that require large framebuffers. At 4K resolution, textures and framebuffer data can easily exceed 4 GB, leading to potential stuttering or texture pop-in as data is swapped. The wide bus partially mitigates this by allowing faster data transfer once assets are in memory, but it cannot compensate for the absolute capacity shortfall. In benchmark terms, this memory subsystem contributes to the card's 80th percentile standing, but the capacity constraint is a bottleneck for contemporary applications that assume 8 GB or more as a baseline. The HBM type also means that memory is co-located on the package, reducing latency compared to traditional GDDR5, but this advantage is less relevant when capacity is exhausted.
Who Should Consider It
Given the 80th percentile ranking and the 0.2% delta against the RTX 3080, the Radeon Pro Duo is a card for compute-focused users who prioritize raw OpenCL throughput over modern feature support. For workloads that fit within the 4 GB memory limit, such as certain medical imaging, financial modeling, or early machine learning inference tasks, the card offers performance comparable to an RTX 3080, as indicated by the 0.2% lead in the benchmark data. Users running these specific tasks at 1080p or 1440p resolutions, where memory pressure is less severe, will find the card adequate.
Conversely, the 4 GB VRAM makes it unsuitable for 4K gaming or texture-heavy professional workflows. The data shows a 0.7% deficit against the RX 7900 GRE and a 1.2% deficit against the NVIDIA T1000, meaning that newer cards provide similar or slightly better compute performance with higher memory capacities and modern architectures. For users who need to run current software, the lack of support for newer APIs beyond DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170 may pose compatibility issues. This card is best suited for legacy compute pipelines or as a dedicated accelerator for a specific OpenCL-based application that is known to work with GCN 3.0. It is not a general-purpose gaming or content-creation card by modern standards, despite its historical positioning.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The Radeon Pro Duo has no dedicated ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, as these fields are null in the specifications. This absence is a defining characteristic of the GCN 3.0 architecture, which predates the hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI acceleration features found in later GPUs. The card's feature set is therefore limited to traditional compute and rasterization, with no support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects.
API support is capped at DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170. These are functional for many current games, but the lack of RT cores means any ray tracing workload will be handled by the shader units, which are 4096 in number. The 8.192 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) performance can be leveraged for compute-based effects, but this is inefficient compared to dedicated hardware. The card also has 256 texture mapping units and 64 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 64.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 256.0 GTexel/s. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 1.4a and 3x DisplayPort 1.2, which are older standards that limit maximum resolutions and refresh rates on modern monitors. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is sufficient for bandwidth but lacks the PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 throughput of newer platforms. In summary, the feature set is a snapshot of 2016-era professional graphics, with compute as the primary strength.
FAQ
Q: How does the Radeon Pro Duo compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in OpenCL performance?
A: The Radeon Pro Duo scores 35,860, which is 0.2% higher than the RTX 3080's 35,787, indicating near-identical compute performance in this specific benchmark.
Q: What is the memory capacity and bandwidth of this card?
A: It has 4 GB of HBM memory on a 4096-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a wide bus but a low capacity by modern standards.
Q: What power supply is recommended for the Radeon Pro Duo?
A: The suggested PSU rating is 750 W, and the card requires three 8-pin power connectors. Its TDP is 350 W.
Q: Does the Radeon Pro Duo support hardware ray tracing?
A: No, it has no ray tracing cores or tensor cores. Ray tracing effects would be handled via shader units, but the card's API support is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170.
Q: What is the performance difference between the Radeon Pro Duo and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE?
A: The RX 7900 GRE scores 36,101, which is 0.7% higher than the Pro Duo's 35,860, making the newer card slightly faster in OpenCL compute.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of this card?
A: The launch MSRP is 1,499 USD. The card is now end-of-life and was released on 2016-04-25.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD Radeon Pro Duo are below.
Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD Radeon Pro Duo handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby PerformersPopular AMD Radeon Pro Duo Comparisons
See how the Radeon Pro Duo stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs