AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 575X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile occupy opposite ends of the mobile graphics spectrum, separated by six years of architecture evolution and a 40x difference in transistor count. Benchmark data from the FACT PACK shows the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile winning both head-to-head tests decisively, yet the Radeon Pro 575X holds a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs at 82 versus 80 for the NVIDIA part. This paradox—where the older card ranks better globally but loses every direct comparison—stems from the different benchmark suites each card was tested with, and it makes for a nuanced analysis of what each product actually delivers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two cards share only two common benchmark results in the FACT PACK: Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. In both, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile dominates with a margin that is nothing short of generational.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 against the Radeon Pro 575X’s 34,773. That is a deltaPct of -75.8% from the AMD card’s perspective, meaning the NVIDIA part outperforms it by roughly 314%. The raw compute advantage is staggering, and it reflects the massive difference in shading units—5,888 on the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile versus 2,048 on the Radeon Pro 575X—as well as the memory bandwidth gap of 672.0 GB/s versus 217.0 GB/s.

Geekbench Vulkan tells a similar story. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile posts 139,213, while the Radeon Pro 575X manages 37,919, a deltaPct of -72.8%. Here the NVIDIA card leads by about 267%. Vulkan workloads tend to scale well with raw geometry throughput and memory bandwidth, both of which favor the newer GPU. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s texture rate of 266.2 GTexel/s is nearly double the Radeon Pro 575X’s 140.3 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate of 115.8 GPixel/s versus 35.07 GPixel/s explains why it pulls ahead so sharply.

The head-to-head tally shows the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile winning both tests, leaving the Radeon Pro 575X with zero wins. However, the Radeon Pro 575X does have its own benchmark suite—Geekbench Metal—where it scores 44,655. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile was not tested in Metal, so no direct comparison exists there, but that score contributes to the AMD card’s average benchmark score of 39,116. The NVIDIA card’s average benchmark score is 35,435, which is dragged down by its Passmark results, including a 151 in DirectX 10, 237 in DirectX 11, 102 in DirectX 12, and 259 in DirectX 9. These low Passmark scores are likely due to driver or workload scaling issues, not representative of the card’s true compute potential, but they do affect its aggregate percentile.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575X has an average benchmark score of 39,116, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile averages 35,435. Despite this, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins both shared head-to-head tests by wide margins.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits within 2.4% of its nearest rivals. It trails the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 by 0.2%, trails the AMD Radeon Pro Duo by 1.2%, leads the NVIDIA A2 by 2.1%, and trails the NVIDIA T1000 by 2.4%.

Q: What is the Radeon Pro 575X’s closest competitor?

A: The Radeon Pro 575X leads the AMD Radeon Pro 580X by 1.1% and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A by 1.1%, while trailing the AMD Radeon Pro 575 by 1.1% and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile by 1.1%.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro 575X support ray tracing?

A: No. The FACT PACK lists no RT cores for the Radeon Pro 575X, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores.

Q: What DirectX version does each card support?

A: The Radeon Pro 575X supports DirectX 12 (12_0), while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes additional features beyond the base 12_0 profile.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a transistor density of 118.3M per mm², compared to the Radeon Pro 575X’s 24.6M per mm², a nearly 5x difference that reflects the newer 5 nm process node versus 14 nm.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is vast. The AMD Radeon Pro 575X uses the Ellesmere chip built on GCN 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 5,700 million transistors onto a 232 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.6M per mm². GCN 4.0 is a scalar-oriented design that emphasizes raw FP32 throughput, and the card delivers 4.489 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 running at the same rate (1:1).

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, by contrast, uses the GB205 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, for a density of 118.3M per mm². Blackwell 2.0 is a fundamentally different design, with dedicated RT cores and tensor cores—46 and 184 respectively—that enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. Its FP32 output is 17.04 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 1:1 at 17.04 TFLOPS.

The memory subsystem differs just as dramatically. The Radeon Pro 575X uses 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 217.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, achieving 672.0 GB/s. Despite a narrower bus, the newer GDDR7 memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective) on the GDDR5, which more than compensates for the narrower interface.

The API support also differs. The Radeon Pro 575X supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, adding newer feature levels and extensions. Both cards use a PCIe x16 interface, but the Radeon Pro 575X is limited to PCIe 3.0, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0, offering four times the theoretical bandwidth.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Radeon Pro 575X has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The NVIDIA card also adds 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, neither of which exist on the AMD part.

Memory capacity is 4 GB versus 12 GB, with GDDR5 versus GDDR7, and bus widths of 256-bit versus 192-bit. The bandwidth difference is 217.0 GB/s versus 672.0 GB/s. The Radeon Pro 575X has a TDP of 150 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W—a counterintuitive result given the NVIDIA card’s superior performance, enabled by the more efficient 5 nm process.

The process node is 14 nm versus 5 nm, with foundries GlobalFoundries versus TSMC. Transistor count is 5,700 million versus 31,100 million, and die size is 232 mm² versus 263 mm². The transistor density difference of 24.6M / mm² versus 118.3M / mm² highlights how much more tightly packed the newer process is.

The Radeon Pro 575X has a pixel rate of 35.07 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 140.3 GTexel/s. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a pixel rate of 115.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 266.2 GTexel/s. The Radeon Pro 575X’s memory clock is listed as 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective), while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz, a boost clock of 1447 MHz, and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

The Radeon Pro 575X is end-of-life, released on 2019-03-17, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is active, released on 2025-02-28. The NVIDIA card’s predecessor is listed as GeForce 40 Mobile, while the AMD card has no predecessor or successor listed. Both are IGP slot width with no power connectors, and both have display outputs described as portable device dependent.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins decisively in every shared benchmark, but its wins extend beyond raw scores. Its 12 GB of GDDR7 memory with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth makes it suitable for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and modern workloads that exceed the Radeon Pro 575X’s 4 GB capacity. The presence of RT cores and tensor cores means it can handle ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated tasks, which the Radeon Pro 575X cannot do at all. Its 5 nm process and 60 W TDP deliver far better performance-per-watt, making it a more practical choice for thin-and-light mobile devices despite its superior compute.

The Radeon Pro 575X wins in a narrower sense. Its 82nd percentile vs all GPUs is higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 80th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 39,116 exceeds the NVIDIA card’s 35,435. This suggests that in the specific tests where it excels—notably Geekbench Metal at 44,655—it performs above its class. For legacy applications that rely on OpenCL or Vulkan 1.3, the Radeon Pro 575X is still functional, but its 150 W TDP and older GDDR5 memory make it less efficient. The card’s 256-bit bus width does give it a memory bandwidth advantage per bit compared to the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 192-bit bus, but that is irrelevant given the GDDR7’s speed advantage.

In practical terms, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear choice for any modern workload: its 46 RT cores enable ray tracing, its 184 tensor cores accelerate machine learning, and its 12 GB VRAM handles large models. The Radeon Pro 575X is confined to older DirectX 12 (12_0) workloads and lacks any hardware acceleration beyond basic compute. The data shows that while the Radeon Pro 575X holds its own against GPUs from its era—beating the Radeon Pro 580X by 1.1% and the MX570 A by 1.1%—it cannot compete with a GPU from a completely different architectural generation. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s nearest rivals include the Quadro GV100 and Radeon Pro Duo, both of which it trails by less than 1.2%, placing it in a performance class far above the Radeon Pro 575X.