AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and the AMD Radeon Pro 575 are separated by seven years of GPU architecture, and the benchmark data reflects that gulf clearly. The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers a 399.5% higher OpenCL score and a 442.9% higher Vulkan score in direct head-to-head tests, while the Radeon Pro 575 holds its own only in the context of its own ecosystem, where it posts a Metal score of 46192. This comparison is not a close contest; it is a study in generational progression, where the data shows a decisive performance hierarchy favoring the newer NVIDIA part across every shared workload.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER than the AMD Radeon Pro 575 in OpenCL?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 172795 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the Radeon Pro 575 scores 34596. This represents a 399.5% advantage for the NVIDIA card, making it roughly five times faster in this compute workload.

Q: Which card wins in the Vulkan benchmark, and by how much?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER wins decisively with a score of 205624, compared to the Radeon Pro 575’s 37878. The delta is 442.9%, meaning the NVIDIA card is over five times faster in this API test.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon Pro 575 have any benchmark where it outperforms the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: In the head-to-head data, the Radeon Pro 575 wins zero tests. However, it does have a Geekbench Metal score of 46192, which is a benchmark the RTX 4070 SUPER does not have a comparable score for in this data set, so it cannot be directly compared.

Q: How do the two cards rank among all GPUs based on average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER sits in the 83rd percentile with an average score of 43223, while the Radeon Pro 575 sits in the 82nd percentile with an average score of 39555. Despite the huge gap in raw scores, their percentile rankings are only one point apart.

Q: What is the closest rival to the RTX 4070 SUPER in terms of average score?

A: The closest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, which has an average score of 43262. This is only 0.1% higher than the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 43223, making the two statistically equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the closest rival to the Radeon Pro 575 in terms of average score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575X is the nearest rival with an average score of 39116, which is 1.1% lower than the Radeon Pro 575’s 39555. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is also close, matching the 39555 average score with a 0% delta.

The Verdict

The data points to a single conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the overwhelmingly superior GPU for any workload measured by these benchmarks. In every shared test, it more than quadruples the AMD Radeon Pro 575’s output, with deltas of 399.5% in OpenCL and 442.9% in Vulkan. For users running compute or graphics tasks that leverage these APIs, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the only rational choice from this pair.

The AMD Radeon Pro 575, however, is not without a niche. Its Geekbench Metal score of 46192 shows it retains some utility in Apple-centric environments, where Metal is the primary graphics API. Given its 150 W TDP and MXM Module form factor, it was designed for portable or compact Mac systems. Users constrained to that ecosystem, or those requiring a low-power embedded solution, would still find it functional, but they should expect performance that is a fraction of what the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers.

For anyone building or upgrading a desktop system with PCIe 4.0 support and a 550 W power supply recommendation, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the clear winner. Its 12 GB GDDR6X memory, 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, and 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute dwarf the Radeon Pro 575’s 4 GB GDDR5, 217.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 4.489 TFLOPS. The verdict is unambiguous: the RTX 4070 SUPER wins on raw performance, while the Radeon Pro 575 only makes sense in its specific legacy or low-power deployment context.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two direct comparisons in the data are Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan, and both are one-sided affairs. Starting with OpenCL, the RTX 4070 SUPER posts a score of 172795, while the Radeon Pro 575 manages only 34596. The 399.5% delta means the NVIDIA card delivers nearly five times the compute throughput in this general-purpose GPU workload. This is consistent with the massive architectural gap between the two, as the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly 7.9 times the Radeon Pro 575’s 4.489 TFLOPS, though the benchmark delta is lower due to other factors.

The Vulkan test shows an even larger gap. The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 205624, compared to the Radeon Pro 575’s 37878, resulting in a 442.9% advantage. This suggests the NVIDIA card excels particularly well in modern graphics API workloads, likely benefiting from its Ada Lovelace architecture’s dedicated RT and tensor cores, which the Radeon Pro 575 lacks entirely. The Radeon Pro 575 does have a Geekbench Metal score of 46192, but since the RTX 4070 SUPER has no corresponding Metal benchmark in this data set, no direct comparison is possible.

Aggregate scores reinforce the head-to-head results. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s average benchmark score is 43223, while the Radeon Pro 575’s is 39555. Interestingly, the RTX 4070 SUPER’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43262, -0.1% delta) and the RTX 4090 Mobile (43667, -1% delta), placing it in the same performance tier as those products. The Radeon Pro 575 sits alongside the RTX A500 Mobile (39568, 0% delta) and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40063, -1.3% delta), showing it is competitive with older or lower-tier workstation parts, but not with modern high-end GPUs.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ on nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 4070 SUPER is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Radeon Pro 575 uses a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. This manufacturing difference leads to a stark contrast in transistor density: the NVIDIA chip packs 35,800 million transistors into 294 mm², yielding 121.8M transistors per mm², whereas the AMD chip contains just 5,700 million transistors across 232 mm², for a density of 24.6M per mm².

Memory configurations are also worlds apart. The RTX 4070 SUPER offers 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, achieving 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 575, by contrast, has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a wider 256-bit bus, yet still only reaches 217.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card’s memory clock is 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective), while the AMD card’s is 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective), showing that the older GDDR5 standard cannot match the newer GDDR6X in throughput.

Compute resources follow the same pattern. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 7168 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, while the Radeon Pro 575 has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The NVIDIA card also includes 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores, features completely absent from the AMD part. Pixel rate is 198.0 GPixel/s for the RTX 4070 SUPER versus 35.07 GPixel/s for the Radeon Pro 575, and texture rate is 554.4 GTexel/s versus 140.3 GTexel/s.

Power and form factor further differentiate the pair. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a 220 W TDP, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length. The Radeon Pro 575 has a 150 W TDP, uses no external power connectors, and comes as an MXM Module, making it suitable for portable or proprietary systems. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the AMD card uses PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 4070 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Radeon Pro 575’s outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4070 SUPER is based on the AD104 chip using NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture, which is a modern design tailored for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. It features 56 dedicated RT cores and 224 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style features, though the latter is not explicitly benchmarked here. The architecture also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compliant with current-generation graphics APIs.

The Radeon Pro 575 uses the Ellesmere chip with AMD’s GCN 4.0 architecture, which predates dedicated ray tracing and tensor hardware. It has no RT cores or tensor cores, relying entirely on its 2048 shading units for compute. This limits its feature set to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3, which lack some of the advanced features of DirectX 12 Ultimate. The GCN 4.0 architecture is also significantly older, as evidenced by the 14 nm process versus the 5 nm process of the RTX 4070 SUPER.

FP16 performance is identical to FP32 on both cards at a 1:1 ratio, meaning neither has a dedicated half-precision boost. However, the sheer scale of the NVIDIA card’s FP32 output—35.48 TFLOPS versus 4.489 TFLOPS—means it outperforms the AMD card in every compute scenario, regardless of precision. The RTX 4070 SUPER also supports OpenGL 4.6, matching the Radeon Pro 575, but its newer Vulkan 1.4 support offers better compatibility with modern engines. The Radeon Pro 575’s generation is listed as "Radeon Pro Mac (500 Series)," indicating its design was optimized for Apple’s ecosystem, which explains its Metal support and MXM form factor.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 SUPER wins in every directly comparable workload. Its 172795 OpenCL score and 205624 Vulkan score are both over four times higher than the Radeon Pro 575’s corresponding results. For users running machine learning, video rendering, or high-end gaming, the data shows the NVIDIA card is the superior choice. Its 12 GB memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth also make it better suited for large datasets or high-resolution textures, where the Radeon Pro 575’s 4 GB capacity would quickly become a bottleneck.

The Radeon Pro 575’s only potential edge lies in its Metal benchmark score of 46192, which has no direct NVIDIA equivalent in this data set. This suggests it retains some relevance for macOS applications that rely on Metal for GPU acceleration. Its 150 W TDP and MXM Module form factor also make it a lower-power, more compact option, ideal for systems where space and thermal constraints are paramount. For users with legacy Mac Pro systems or portable workstations that require an MXM card, the Radeon Pro 575 is the only one of the two that physically fits.

In terms of percentile ranking, the two cards are surprisingly close: the RTX 4070 SUPER is in the 83rd percentile, while the Radeon Pro 575 is in the 82nd. This indicates that while the absolute performance gap is enormous, the Radeon Pro 575 still outperforms a significant portion of the GPU landscape, likely because many GPUs are integrated or low-end parts. However, this does little to close the gap in real-world tasks; for any user who can accommodate the RTX 4070 SUPER’s larger size and higher power draw, the data unequivocally favors the NVIDIA card.