AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro 570X
RTX A2000 12 GB
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
NVIDIA’s RTX A2000 12 GB and AMD’s Radeon Pro 570X represent two very different eras of workstation graphics, and the benchmark data reflects a generational gulf. The RTX A2000 lands in the 79th percentile of all GPUs, while the Radeon Pro 570X sits at the 76th percentile, but that overall similarity masks a decisive performance gap in the one direct comparison available.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The only shared benchmark between the two cards is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is a landslide. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB scores 66,998 points, while the AMD Radeon Pro 570X manages 27,604 points. That works out to a 142.7% advantage for the NVIDIA card—more than double the raw compute output. In practical terms, the RTX A2000 delivers a 39,394-point lead, a margin so large that it dwarfs the entire average benchmark score of the AMD card.
Wider context sharpens the picture. The RTX A2000’s average benchmark score across all tests is 34,154, which places it within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 560 XT (34,133) and just 0.6% behind the NVIDIA TITAN V (34,355). The Radeon Pro 570X, by contrast, averages 32,176 across its tests, sitting 0.7% behind the AMD FirePro S10000 (32,388) and 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (32,456). So while both cards occupy similar mid-pack territory in the broader GPU hierarchy, the RTX A2000 edges toward the top of that band while the Radeon Pro 570X hovers near the bottom.
The head-to-head tally is unambiguous: the RTX A2000 wins the only contested benchmark, giving it 1 win to 0 for the Radeon Pro 570X. No other direct comparisons exist in the data, so the OpenCL result stands as the definitive measure of relative compute capability. The 142.7% delta is not a marginal improvement—it is a categorical shift in performance class, akin to comparing a modern mid-range card to an entry-level product from several generations prior.
Architecture Differences
The architectural chasm between these two GPUs explains the benchmark gap. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA106 chip, fabricated on Samsung’s 8 nm process. AMD’s Radeon Pro 570X uses the older GCN 4.0 architecture with the Ellesmere chip, produced on GlobalFoundries’ 14 nm node. That process difference alone accounts for a substantial density advantage: the RTX A2000 packs 12,000 million transistors into a 276 mm² die, yielding 43.5 million transistors per square millimeter. The Radeon Pro 570X squeezes 5,700 million transistors into 232 mm², for a density of just 24.6M / mm².
Core counts follow the same trajectory. The RTX A2000 fields 3,328 shading units, 104 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. The Radeon Pro 570X counters with 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. NVIDIA’s card also brings dedicated hardware that AMD’s card lacks entirely: 26 ray tracing cores and 104 tensor cores. The Radeon Pro 570X has no RT cores and no tensor cores, reflecting its GCN-era design that predates dedicated acceleration for those workloads.
Memory configurations diverge sharply as well. The RTX A2000 carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 570X offers only 4 GB of GDDR5 on a wider 256-bit bus, but that wider interface cannot compensate for the older memory type—it tops out at 217.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card provides triple the capacity and roughly 33% more bandwidth, a combination that matters for large datasets and texture-heavy workloads.
Clock speeds tell a more nuanced story. The Radeon Pro 570X runs at a 1000 MHz base and 1105 MHz boost, while the RTX A2000 has a much lower 562 MHz base and 1200 MHz boost. The AMD card’s higher base clock reflects its simpler architecture, but the NVIDIA card’s boost clock edges ahead. Effective memory speeds also favor NVIDIA: 12 Gbps versus 6.8 Gbps. The resulting throughput figures are lopsided—the RTX A2000 produces 7.987 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 7.987 TFLOPS of FP16, while the Radeon Pro 570X manages 3.960 TFLOPS in both. Pixel and texture rates mirror this: 57.60 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s for NVIDIA, versus 35.36 GPixel/s and 123.8 GTexel/s for AMD.
Power and physical design differ just as fundamentally. The RTX A2000 consumes 70 W TDP and occupies a dual-slot form factor, drawing power entirely from the PCIe slot with no auxiliary connectors. The Radeon Pro 570X is rated at 150 W TDP and is classified as an integrated graphics processor (IGP), designed for portable devices with display outputs that are “Portable Device Dependent.” The NVIDIA card is a standalone 167 mm long, 69 mm tall add-in board with four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs; the AMD chip has no listed dimensions and relies on the host device for display connectivity.
API support also reflects the generational gap. The RTX A2000 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon Pro 570X tops out at DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA card’s higher DirectX feature level and newer Vulkan version indicate broader compatibility with modern rendering techniques, including the ray tracing features that its hardware explicitly accelerates.
FAQ
Q: Which card performs better in Geekbench OpenCL?
A: The NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB scores 66,998 versus 27,604 for the AMD Radeon Pro 570X, a 142.7% advantage for NVIDIA.
Q: Does the Radeon Pro 570X have ray tracing or tensor cores?
A: No. The Radeon Pro 570X lists no RT cores and no tensor cores, while the RTX A2000 includes 26 RT cores and 104 tensor cores.
Q: How do their memory capacities compare?
A: The RTX A2000 offers 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 570X has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: What are the power requirements for each card?
A: The RTX A2000 has a 70 W TDP and no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Radeon Pro 570X has a 150 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU listed.
Q: Which card supports newer graphics APIs?
A: The RTX A2000 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon Pro 570X supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.
Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare to their nearest rivals?
A: The RTX A2000 averages 34,154, within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 560 XT and 0.6% behind the NVIDIA TITAN V. The Radeon Pro 570X averages 32,176, 0.7% behind the AMD FirePro S10000 and 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE.
The Verdict
The data points to a single conclusion: the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB is the superior workstation GPU in every measurable category. Its 142.7% OpenCL lead over the Radeon Pro 570X is the headline number, but the supporting evidence is just as one-sided. The RTX A2000 offers more than three times the memory capacity, higher bandwidth, nearly double the FP32 throughput, and dedicated RT and tensor cores. It also consumes less than half the power (70 W versus 150 W) while delivering that performance, making it the more efficient choice for any compute task.
The Radeon Pro 570X is not without its niches. Its IGP designation and portable-device-dependent display outputs suggest it was designed for integration into laptops or all-in-one systems where discrete card dimensions are irrelevant. Its 256-bit memory bus and higher base clock (1000 MHz versus 562 MHz) hint at a design tuned for specific legacy workloads, and its 76th percentile ranking shows it was a competent card in its era. But the benchmark results do not support recommending it for any task where the RTX A2000 is available.
For professionals choosing between these two, the RTX A2000 is the clear pick for rendering, compute, and any workload that can leverage its tensor cores or ray tracing hardware. The Radeon Pro 570X should only be considered if the system requires an IGP form factor and cannot accommodate a dual-slot discrete card. Even then, the performance penalty—less than half the OpenCL score—is severe. The RTX A2000’s 79th percentile ranking versus the Radeon’s 76th understates the gap; in direct comparison, this is not a contest.
Specification Differences
| Specification | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | AMD Radeon Pro 570X |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Foundry | Samsung | GlobalFoundries |
| Transistors | 12,000 million | 5,700 million |
| Die Size | 276 mm² | 232 mm² |
| Transistor Density | 43.5M / mm² | 24.6M / mm² |
| Base Clock | 562 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1105 MHz |
| Memory Clock | 1500 MHz / 12 Gbps effective | 1695 MHz / 6.8 Gbps effective |
| Memory Size | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
| Shading Units | 3328 | 1792 |
| TMUs | 104 | 112 |
| ROPs | 48 | 32 |
| RT Cores | 26 | None |
| Tensor Cores | 104 | None |
| Pixel Rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | 35.36 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 123.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 | 7.987 TFLOPS | 3.960 TFLOPS |
| FP16 | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 3.960 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| TDP | 70 W | 150 W |
| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Dimensions | 167 mm x 69 mm | Not listed |
| Release Date | 2021-11-22 | 2019-03-17 |
| Launch MSRP | 449 USD | None |