AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a stark contrast between these two mobile graphics solutions. In the two shared tests, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile dominates the AMD Radeon Pro 570X by margins that are difficult to overstate.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA part scores 143,870 against AMD's 27,604. That is a delta of 421.2%, meaning the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers more than five times the compute throughput in this workload. The gap is so wide that the AMD Radeon Pro 570X's score is closer to the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's Vulkan result (28,859) than it is to the NVIDIA OpenCL figure.

The Geekbench Vulkan test tells a similar story. NVIDIA posts 139,213, while AMD manages 28,859. The delta here is 382.4%, still a massive advantage for the newer GeForce part. Vulkan is a low-level API that tends to scale with raw hardware resources, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has those resources in abundance.

It is notably the AMD Radeon Pro 570X has one benchmark result that does not appear in the NVIDIA data set: Geekbench Metal, where it scores 40,066. However, this is a Mac-oriented API, and the NVIDIA part does not have a recorded Metal result in the database. For cross-platform comparisons, the OpenCL and Vulkan numbers are the only common ground, and they are overwhelmingly one-sided.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also shows a much higher average benchmark score across all recorded tests: 35,435 versus 32,176 for the AMD part. This 9.7% gap in average score is far smaller than the head-to-head deltas, which suggests the AMD card performs relatively better in its specific test set (Metal, OpenCL, Vulkan) than it does against the NVIDIA part directly. Still, the average score places the NVIDIA GPU in the 80th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD part sits in the 76th percentile.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each card provides additional context. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's closest competitor is the NVIDIA Quadro GV100, with an average score of 35,520, a delta of just -0.2%. The AMD Radeon Pro 570X's nearest rival is the AMD FirePro S10000 at 32,388, a delta of -0.7%. Both cards are essentially tied with their nearest rivals, but the absolute level of performance is clearly in NVIDIA's favor.

The Verdict

The data leaves no ambiguity: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the superior GPU for raw compute and graphics workloads. In the two tests where both cards have recorded results, the NVIDIA part leads by 421.2% and 382.4%, respectively. Those are not incremental gains; they represent a generational leap in mobile graphics performance.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also carries a higher average benchmark score, a higher percentile ranking, and a much more modern feature set. It is an active production part released in 2025, while the AMD Radeon Pro 570X is end-of-life and dates from 2019. For any user choosing between these two based on benchmark data, the NVIDIA card is the clear choice.

However, the AMD Radeon Pro 570X does have one advantage: its Geekbench Metal score of 40,066. In the database, this is the only test where the AMD card has a recorded result that the NVIDIA part cannot match, simply because no Metal score exists for the GeForce GPU. For users locked into Apple's Metal ecosystem, the AMD card remains a functional option, though its OpenCL and Vulkan scores suggest it would still trail the NVIDIA part significantly in those APIs.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the pick for anyone running OpenCL, Vulkan, or DirectX workloads. The AMD Radeon Pro 570X is only relevant in Metal-specific environments, and even then, its performance is modest by modern standards. The verdict is straightforward: NVIDIA wins on nearly every measurable axis.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is enormous, reflecting nearly six years of hardware evolution.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB205 chip. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 31,100 million transistors packed into a 263 mm² die. That works out to a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The AMD Radeon Pro 570X, by contrast, uses the Ellesmere chip with GCN 4.0 architecture, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It contains 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, giving a density of 24.6 million per square millimeter. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has roughly 5.5 times the transistor count on a slightly larger die, which explains its massive performance advantage.

Memory configurations are equally divergent. The NVIDIA part has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD card has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 217.0 GB/s. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile offers three times the capacity and more than three times the bandwidth, even with a narrower bus. Its memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the AMD card runs at 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective).

Core counts tell a similar story. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It also includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. The AMD Radeon Pro 570X has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no ray tracing or tensor cores at all. The NVIDIA part has more than three times the shading units and 2.5 times the TMUs, plus dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads that the AMD card simply lacks.

Clock speeds are the one area where AMD shows a nominal advantage. The Radeon Pro 570X runs at a base clock of 1000 MHz and boosts to 1105 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost of 1447 MHz. While the AMD card starts at a higher base frequency, the NVIDIA part boosts significantly higher, and its massive core count more than compensates for the lower base clock.

Power consumption also differs substantially. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at 60 W TDP, while the AMD Radeon Pro 570X is rated at 150 W. This is remarkable: the NVIDIA GPU delivers roughly five times the performance in OpenCL while consuming less than half the power. Both are integrated into portable devices with no dedicated power connectors, but the NVIDIA part is far more efficient per watt.

Interface support also favors NVIDIA. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the AMD card uses PCIe 3.0 x16. For API support, the NVIDIA part hits DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA GPU has access to the latest DirectX feature set and a newer Vulkan revision.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an average benchmark score of 35,435, compared to 32,176 for the AMD Radeon Pro 570X.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compare to its nearest rival?

A: Its closest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro GV100, which has an average score of 35,520. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile trails by just 0.2%.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 570X has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon Pro 570X have ray tracing cores?

A: No, the AMD card has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at 60 W TDP, while the Radeon Pro 570X is rated at 150 W TDP.

Q: Which GPU supports the newer PCIe interface?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Radeon Pro 570X uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every head-to-head test recorded in the database. It takes Geekbench OpenCL with a 421.2% delta and Geekbench Vulkan with a 382.4% delta. It also wins on raw specifications: more memory, higher bandwidth, more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores, a smaller process node, and a higher boost clock.

The AMD Radeon Pro 570X wins in one specific context: the Geekbench Metal benchmark, where it scores 40,066. This is the only test in the database where the AMD card has a result that the NVIDIA part does not match. For macOS environments that rely on Metal, the Radeon Pro 570X is a functional choice. It also has a higher base clock (1000 MHz versus 847 MHz), though its boost clock is lower (1105 MHz versus 1447 MHz).

For users running OpenCL or Vulkan workloads, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only rational option. The performance gap is so large that the AMD card cannot compete in any cross-platform compute scenario. For users in Apple's Metal ecosystem, the AMD card remains relevant, but its 4 GB memory capacity and 150 W TDP make it a less attractive option for demanding modern workloads.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also wins on efficiency. It delivers its massive performance advantage while drawing 60 W, compared to the AMD card's 150 W. This makes it the better choice for thin-and-light portable devices where thermal and power constraints are critical. The AMD Radeon Pro 570X, with its higher power draw and older architecture, is harder to justify in any scenario other than legacy Metal compatibility.

In summary, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the winner for compute, gaming, and modern API workloads. The Radeon Pro 570X is a niche product for Metal-specific environments, and even there, its performance is dated. The data is unambiguous: NVIDIA dominates this comparison.