AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Pro 570X

CORE STATE Ellesmere
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1105 MHz
TDP 150 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE GCN 4.0
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2019
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2610 MHz
TDP 285 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
40,066
N/A
geekbench_opencl
27,604
199,267
geekbench_vulkan
28,859
53,683
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
5,569
passmark_directx_10
N/A
181
passmark_directx_11
N/A
278
passmark_directx_12
N/A
119
passmark_directx_9
N/A
360
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,225
passmark_g3d
N/A
31,811
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
18,372

Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

The AMD Radeon Pro 570X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER occupy vastly different tiers of the graphics hardware spectrum, separated by five years of architecture evolution and a 7x gap in average benchmark scores. The data shows a complete dominance by the NVIDIA card in every shared test, though the AMD part’s remaining strength lies in its integrated form factor and legacy compatibility.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two cards were directly compared in only two benchmark suites, and the results are decisively one-sided. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scored 199,267 points against the AMD Radeon Pro 570X’s 27,604 points. That represents a 86.1% deficit for the AMD card, meaning the NVIDIA part delivers roughly 7.2 times the raw compute throughput in this API. The gap is so large that the AMD card’s score barely registers as a fraction of the NVIDIA result.

The Vulkan benchmark shows a narrower but still commanding margin. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER posted 53,683 points, while the Radeon Pro 570X managed 28,859. The delta here is 46.2%, which means the NVIDIA card is nearly double the performance of the AMD card in Vulkan workloads. While this is a smaller relative gap than OpenCL, it still represents a decisive victory for the Ada Lovelace architecture. Notably, the AMD card’s Vulkan score is actually higher than its OpenCL score, suggesting the GCN 4.0 architecture handles Vulkan’s explicit API model relatively well, but the absolute performance ceiling remains far lower.

Looking at the broader benchmark context, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s average benchmark score of 31,087 places it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (31,676 average, 1.9% higher), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (31,532, 1.4% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (31,206, 0.4% higher). This places the card in a tight cluster of professional and enthusiast-level GPUs, with its performance essentially matching the previous-generation flagship TITAN RTX. The AMD Radeon Pro 570X also sits in the 76th percentile with an average score of 32,176, but its nearest rivals are entirely different: the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 (32,540, 1.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (32,456, 0.9% higher), and the AMD FirePro S10000 (32,388, 0.7% higher). Both cards occupy the same percentile band, but the AMD part achieves this through a much lower absolute score, indicating the benchmark distribution is denser at lower performance levels.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins every head-to-head benchmark in this comparison, and its advantage is most pronounced in compute-heavy OpenCL workloads. The 86.1% lead in OpenCL suggests the card is better suited for general-purpose GPU computing, scientific simulations, and any workload that leverages the massive 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 46.2% lead in Vulkan indicates strong gaming and real-time rendering performance, where the Ada Lovelace architecture’s dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores provide additional acceleration for modern graphics APIs.

The AMD Radeon Pro 570X, by contrast, has no benchmark wins in this comparison. However, its data reveals a different kind of advantage: the card’s IGP slot width and lack of power connectors make it suitable for portable or integrated system designs. Its 150 W TDP is remarkably low compared to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 285 W, and its display outputs are described as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning it is designed for laptops or all-in-one systems where the NVIDIA card’s 310 mm length and triple-slot width would be physically impossible to install. The AMD card’s 4 GB GDDR5 memory, while small, is adequate for legacy professional workloads that do not require large framebuffers.

For users prioritizing raw performance, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only choice. For users constrained by physical space, power delivery, or the need for a mobile form factor, the Radeon Pro 570X remains a functional option, albeit one with drastically lower performance. The AMD card’s end-of-life production status and 2019 release date further indicate it is a legacy product, while the NVIDIA card, despite also being end-of-life, is a much more recent release (2024-01-23).

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is immense. The AMD Radeon Pro 570X uses the Ellesmere chip built on GCN 4.0 architecture, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It contains 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.6M per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.1M per mm². This represents a 5x increase in transistor count and a 4.9x increase in density, demonstrating the massive scaling enabled by the newer process node.

The shading resources are similarly lopsided. The AMD card has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The NVIDIA card has 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. These translate to a pixel rate of 35.36 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 123.8 GTexel/s for AMD, versus 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s for NVIDIA — an 7x advantage in both metrics. The FP32 compute is 3.960 TFLOPS for AMD versus 44.10 TFLOPS for NVIDIA, an 11.1x gap. Both cards run FP16 at the same rate as FP32 (1:1), but the NVIDIA card’s absolute FP16 performance is equally dominant.

The memory subsystems are also generations apart. The AMD card uses 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 217.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s — 3.1 times more bandwidth. The NVIDIA card’s memory clock is 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) versus AMD’s 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective), and while the AMD clock is higher, the GDDR6X’s double data rate and wider effective throughput win decisively.

Feature-wise, the differences are stark. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The Radeon Pro 570X has neither. The NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the AMD card supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface versus the AMD card’s PCIe 3.0 x16, and the NVIDIA card requires a 600 W suggested PSU and a 16-pin power connector, while the AMD card draws power from the motherboard with no external connectors.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 570X has a higher average benchmark score of 32,176 compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 31,087. However, this is misleading because the AMD card’s only benchmarks are Geekbench tests, while the NVIDIA card includes PassMark and 3DMark tests that are more demanding.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in OpenCL?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 86.1% higher than the Radeon Pro 570X’s 27,604. This is the largest performance gap between the two cards.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, while the Radeon Pro 570X has 4 GB of GDDR5. The NVIDIA card also has 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth versus 217.0 GB/s for the AMD card.

Q: Do both cards support ray tracing?

A: No. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 dedicated RT cores, while the Radeon Pro 570X has no ray tracing hardware. The NVIDIA card also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, while the AMD card supports only DirectX 12 (12_0).

Q: Which card is physically larger?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. The Radeon Pro 570X is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no specified dimensions and no power connectors.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 799 USD. The Radeon Pro 570X has no listed MSRP.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon Pro 570X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |

| Transistors | 5,700 million | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | 232 mm² | 379 mm² |

| Base Clock | 1000 MHz | 2340 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 672.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 8448 |

| TMUs | 112 | 264 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT Cores | None | 66 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 264 |

| Pixel Rate | 35.36 GPixel/s | 250.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.8 GTexel/s | 689.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.960 TFLOPS | 44.10 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 3.960 TFLOPS (1:1) | 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 150 W | 285 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Triple-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |

| Release Date | 2019-03-17 | 2024-01-23 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |

| Launch MSRP | None | 799 USD |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro 570X
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
8,448 +371.4%
Shaders
1,792
8,448 +371.4%
TMUs
112
264 +135.7%
ROPs
32
96 +200.0%
Compute Units
28
—
SM Count
—
66
Clocks
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2340 MHz
Boost Clock
1105 MHz
2610 MHz
Memory Clock
1695 MHz 6.8 Gbps effective
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
16,384 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
256 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
217.0 GB/s
672.3 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
35.36 GPixel/s
250.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
123.8 GTexel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.960 TFLOPS
44.10 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
247.5 GFLOPS (1:16)
689.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
3.960 TFLOPS (1:1)
44.10 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
—
66
Tensor Cores
—
264
Power
TDP
150 W
285 W
TDP (W)
150
285 +90.0%
Suggested PSU
—
600 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Ellesmere
AD103
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac (500X Series)
GeForce 40
Process Size
14 nm
5 nm
Transistors
5,700 million
45,900 million
Die Size
232 mm²
379 mm²
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
TSMC
Density
24.6M / mm²
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.3
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.7
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Triple-slot
Length
—
310 mm 12.2 inches
Height
—
140 mm 5.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
799 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
—
GeForce 30
Successor
—
GeForce 50
View Radeon Pro 570X Details View GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Details