AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 570X and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 represent two distinct eras of GPU design, separated by a generational leap in architecture, process technology, and raw capability. The data available paints a clear picture of a decisive performance hierarchy, but the specific nature of each card’s strengths and the context of their intended use cases reveal a more nuanced story than simple benchmark scores might suggest.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are unequivocal in their verdict: the Radeon RX 6700 dominates the Radeon Pro 570X in every single test where they are directly compared. The three available head-to-head benchmarks, all from the Geekbench suite, show a consistent and massive performance gap.

In the Geekbench Metal test, the RX 6700 scores 122,223, while the Pro 570X manages 40,066. This represents a delta of -67.2% for the older card, meaning the RX 6700 is roughly three times faster. This is the largest single-score disparity in the comparison.

The Geekbench OpenCL test tells a similar story, with the RX 6700 achieving 97,841 against the Pro 570X's 27,604. The delta here is -71.8%, the most significant relative difference between the two cards in any test. This suggests the RX 6700’s architectural efficiency is particularly well-suited to general-purpose compute workloads.

Finally, in the Geekbench Vulkan test, the RX 6700 scores 83,974 compared to the Pro 570X's 28,859, a -65.6% delta. While this is the smallest percentage gap of the three, it still represents a monumental lead for the newer card. Across all three tests, the RX 6700 wins a clean sweep, taking all 3 head-to-head wins and leaving the Pro 570X with zero.

The sheer magnitude of these deltas, all exceeding 65%, indicates that this is not a close contest. It is a complete generational overthrow. The performance per clock and per shading unit of the RDNA 2.0 architecture in the RX 6700 simply outclasses the older GCN 4.0 design in the Pro 570X.

Where Each One Wins

Given the head-to-head results, it is tempting to say the RX 6700 wins everywhere. However, looking at the broader benchmark profile and the cards' specifications, a more differentiated picture emerges for specific use cases.

The Radeon RX 6700 wins in every computationally demanding scenario. Its dominance in Metal, OpenCL, and Vulkan makes it the clear choice for modern gaming, 3D rendering, video editing, and any GPU-accelerated compute task. The data shows a staggering lead in raw throughput, with its FP32 compute at 11.29 TFLOPS versus the Pro 570X's 3.960 TFLOPS. Its advantage in texture rate (352.8 GTexel/s vs 123.8 GTexel/s) and pixel rate (156.8 GPixel/s vs 35.36 GPixel/s) further cements its superiority in rasterization-heavy workloads. Furthermore, its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 makes it future-proof for the latest APIs, while the Pro 570X is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3.

The Radeon Pro 570X finds its niche in a very specific, legacy-oriented context. Its "IGP" slot width and "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs suggest it was designed for integration into Apple Mac systems. Its only potential advantage is its lower power draw, with a 150 W TDP compared to the RX 6700's 175 W. In a thermally constrained, all-in-one system, this lower power envelope could be a factor. However, this is a narrow advantage. In terms of raw capability, the Pro 570X's 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, while having a wider 256-bit bus, offers significantly less capacity and bandwidth (217.0 GB/s) than the RX 6700's 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus (320.0 GB/s). The Pro 570X is simply outclassed in every measurable performance metric, making its only "win" a qualitative one related to power efficiency and legacy system compatibility.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: choose the AMD Radeon RX 6700 for any task that requires performance. Its benchmark scores are between 3 and 3.5 times higher than the Pro 570X across the board. The RX 6700’s average benchmark score of 30,433, while its percentile rank is 75, places it in a different performance class entirely. Its nearest rivals, according to the data, include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and the AMD Radeon RX 6800, which gives context to its position in the market. The Pro 570X, with an average score of 32,176 and a percentile rank of 76, is actually ranked slightly higher by percentile, but this is a statistical artifact of its limited benchmark profile and the specific GCN-era workload distribution. Its nearest rivals, like the AMD FirePro S10000 and Intel Arc Pro A30M, are from a different era or performance tier.

The choice is clear for almost any user. The RX 6700 is a modern, high-performance GPU that excels in gaming, content creation, and compute. Its only drawback is its higher power requirement. The Pro 570X is a legacy part that should only be considered if you are repairing or upgrading a specific system that requires its unique form factor and power profile. For any new build or upgrade, the RX 6700 is the only logical choice based on the data. The performance gap is so vast that the Pro 570X cannot be recommended for any performance-sensitive workload.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 570X has a higher average benchmark score of 32,176 compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6700's 30,433. However, this is due to the different benchmark suites run on each card, as the RX 6700 wins all shared tests by a wide margin.

Q: How much faster is the RX 6700 in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The RX 6700 scores 97,841, which is 71.8% higher than the Pro 570X's score of 27,604 in the Geekbench OpenCL test.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two cards?

A: The RX 6700 has a memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s, which is significantly higher than the 217.0 GB/s offered by the Pro 570X.

Q: Which card supports the newer version of DirectX?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the AMD Radeon Pro 570X only supports DirectX 12 (12_0).

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the RX 6700 based on average score?

A: The RX 6700's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 70HX, with a delta of -0.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, with a delta of 1.6%.

Q: Does the Pro 570X have any advantages based on the data?

A: The Pro 570X has a lower TDP at 150 W compared to the RX 6700's 175 W, and it is designed as an IGP for portable devices, suggesting a niche for legacy Apple Mac systems.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Radeon Pro 570X utilizes the GCN 4.0 architecture, based on the Ellesmere chip, produced on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture, based on the Navi 22 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a much more advanced 7 nm node. This process shrink allows the RX 6700 to pack 17,200 million transistors into a 335 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 51.3M / mm². The Pro 570X, meanwhile, has 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, for a density of 24.6M / mm². This nearly 2.1x difference in transistor density is a key driver of the performance gap.

The architectural differences extend to core design. The RX 6700 features 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 36 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Pro 570X is equipped with 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no ray tracing hardware. The RDNA 2.0 architecture also handles FP16 compute differently, with a 2:1 ratio achieving 22.58 TFLOPS, while GCN 4.0 executes FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, matching its FP32 rate of 3.960 TFLOPS.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal a comprehensive upgrade for the RX 6700. The most obvious difference is the process node: 7 nm for the RX 6700 versus 14 nm for the Pro 570X. This leads to significant differences in the memory subsystem. The RX 6700 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, while the Pro 570X has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus. The effective memory speed is also drastically different: 16 Gbps for the RX 6700 versus 6.8 Gbps for the Pro 570X.

Clock speeds are another major differentiator. The RX 6700 has a base clock of 1941 MHz, a game clock of 2174 MHz, and a boost clock of 2450 MHz. The Pro 570X is significantly slower, with a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1105 MHz. The power profiles also differ, with the RX 6700 having a 175 W TDP and requiring a single 8-pin power connector, while the Pro 570X has a 150 W TDP and uses no power connectors, being an IGP. The RX 6700 is a dual-slot card with dimensions of 267 mm x 110 mm x 40 mm, while the Pro 570X's dimensions are listed as null.

The interface and output capabilities also differ. The RX 6700 uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Pro 570X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 and its display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent." The API support is also newer on the RX 6700, with DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, compared to the Pro 570X's DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Finally, they are from different generations, with the Pro 570X from the "Radeon Pro Mac (500X Series)" and the RX 6700 from the "Navi II (RX 6000)" generation.