AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT has an average benchmark score of 18685, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014. The Pro card sits 0.3% above the AMD Radeon RX 560X and 0.8% above the AMD FirePro D500, while the RX 9060 trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by 0.7%.

Q: In which benchmark does the RX 9060 show its largest advantage?

A: The largest single win for the RX 9060 is in PassMark DirectX 11, where it scores 182 versus 85 for the Pro 5700 XT, a 53.3% lead. The RX 9060 also wins PassMark DirectX 9 by 45.4% (280 vs 153) and PassMark GPU Compute by 41.7% (9919 vs 5787).

Q: Where does the Pro 5700 XT outperform the RX 9060?

A: The Pro 5700 XT wins two head-to-head tests: Geekbench Vulkan with 56593 versus 39476 (a 43.4% advantage) and PassMark DirectX 12 with 59 versus 44 (a 34.1% lead).

Q: How do the memory configurations differ?

A: The Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The Pro 5700 XT uses a 7 nm process with 10,300 million transistors on a 251 mm² die. The RX 9060 uses a 4 nm process with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die.

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture units?

A: The Pro 5700 XT has 2560 shading units and 160 texture mapping units. The RX 9060 has 1792 shading units and 112 texture mapping units. Both have 64 ROPs.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits clearly by workload type. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 dominates in seven of the nine head-to-head tests, winning all PassMark DirectX 9, 10, and 11 tests, plus PassMark G2D, G3D, GPU Compute, and Geekbench OpenCL. This makes it the stronger choice for general 3D rendering, 2D desktop acceleration, compute workloads, and legacy DirectX titles.

The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT wins only two tests, but they are significant in specific contexts. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 56593 versus 39476 for the RX 9060 (a 43.4% advantage) indicates superior Vulkan API performance, which matters for cross-platform games and Vulkan-based applications. Its PassMark DirectX 12 win (59 vs 44, a 34.1% lead) suggests better low-level DX12 efficiency despite the RX 9060 supporting the newer DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set.

The RX 9060 also wins the aggregate PassMark G3D test by 28.8% (17631 vs 12547), confirming its overall rasterization strength. In compute-heavy tasks, the RX 9060 leads PassMark GPU Compute by 41.7% (9919 vs 5787) and Geekbench OpenCL by 32.6% (88183 vs 59467). The Pro 5700 XT’s only compute-oriented win is in Vulkan, where its older architecture still excels.

For users prioritizing modern API efficiency and compute throughput, the RX 9060 is the clear winner. For those specifically needing Vulkan performance or older DX12 titles, the Pro 5700 XT retains a meaningful edge.

Architecture Differences

The two cards represent different generations of AMD GPU design. The Pro 5700 XT uses the Navi 10 chip built on RDNA 1.0, part of the Radeon Pro Mac (Navi Series) generation. The RX 9060 uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0, part of the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation with the codename Strix Point.

The process technology advanced from 7 nm to 4 nm, both from TSMC. The transistor count jumped from 10,300 million to 29,700 million, while the die size shrank from 251 mm² to 199 mm². This results in a transistor density of 41.0 million per square millimeter for the Pro 5700 XT versus 149.2 million per square millimeter for the RX 9060.

The RX 9060 adds 28 ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the Pro 5700 XT. Both cards lack dedicated tensor cores. The RX 9060 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Pro 5700 XT is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory architecture differs substantially. The Pro 5700 XT uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, while the RX 9060 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The RX 9060 has higher effective memory speed at 18 Gbps versus 12 Gbps for the Pro card, but the Pro card’s wider bus yields higher total bandwidth (384.0 GB/s vs 288.0 GB/s).

Clock speeds favor the RX 9060 significantly. Its base clock is 1700 MHz, boost clock is 2990 MHz, and game clock is 2400 MHz. The Pro 5700 XT has a base clock of 1243 MHz and boost clock of 1499 MHz, with no game clock specified. The RX 9060’s FP32 performance reaches 21.43 TFLOPS versus 7.675 TFLOPS for the Pro card, a nearly threefold increase. FP16 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1) for the RX 9060 versus 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Pro card.

Specification Differences

The RX 9060 is a newer, more power-efficient design despite having fewer shading units (1792 vs 2560) and fewer TMUs (112 vs 160). Both cards have 64 ROPs, but the RX 9060 achieves higher pixel and texture rates: 191.4 GPixel/s and 334.9 GTexel/s versus 95.94 GPixel/s and 239.8 GTexel/s for the Pro 5700 XT.

Power consumption is nearly identical: the Pro 5700 XT has a TDP of 130 W, and the RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W. Both recommend a 300 W power supply. However, the Pro 5700 XT is an integrated GPU (IGP) with no power connectors and no display outputs, while the RX 9060 is a dual-slot card with one 8-pin connector and outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a.

The bus interface differs: the Pro 5700 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RX 9060 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The release dates are five years apart, with the Pro card launching on 2020-08-03 and the RX 9060 on 2025-08-04. The Pro 5700 XT is end-of-life, while the RX 9060 is active production. The RX 9060 lists its predecessor as Navi III.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RX 9060 wins seven of nine head-to-head tests, and its victories are decisive. Its largest margin comes in PassMark DirectX 11, where it scores 182 versus 85, a 53.3% advantage. This suggests strong compatibility with DX11 titles, a common workload for older games and many productivity applications.

In PassMark DirectX 9, the RX 9060 leads 280 versus 153, a 45.4% margin. This legacy API performance indicates the newer architecture handles older code paths efficiently. The PassMark GPU Compute test shows a 41.7% lead (9919 vs 5787), reinforcing the RX 9060’s compute superiority. Geekbench OpenCL follows with a 32.6% win (88183 vs 59467).

The RX 9060 also wins PassMark G3D by 28.8% (17631 vs 12547) and PassMark DirectX 10 by 26.9% (104 vs 76). PassMark G2D shows a 19.2% lead (1002 vs 810), indicating faster 2D desktop operations.

The Pro 5700 XT wins two tests with substantial margins. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 56593 versus 39476 represents a 43.4% advantage, the largest win for either card in any test. This suggests that RDNA 1.0 has exceptionally strong Vulkan driver optimization or that the RX 9060’s Vulkan implementation underperforms. The Pro card also wins PassMark DirectX 12 by 34.1% (59 vs 44), showing that its DX12 path is more efficient despite lacking the Ultimate feature set.

When considering the average benchmark scores, the Pro 5700 XT’s overall average of 18685 is higher than the RX 9060’s 16014, a 16.7% difference. However, this average includes the Pro card’s Geekbench Vulkan and DX12 wins, which are not present in the RX 9060’s benchmark suite. The RX 9060’s percentile rank is 59 versus 63 for the Pro card.

The Verdict

The data points to different buyers for each card. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the stronger overall performer for modern gaming and compute workloads. It wins the majority of benchmarks, especially in DirectX 9, 10, and 11, plus OpenCL and compute tests. Its 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 28 ray tracing cores, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support make it the more future-proof choice. The RX 9060 also offers faster pixel and texture rates and a smaller, denser 4 nm die, indicating better architectural efficiency.

The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the better choice for specific Vulkan-centric workloads. Its 43.4% Geekbench Vulkan advantage is substantial and suggests that applications using the Vulkan API will run faster on this older card. Its 34.1% DirectX 12 win also indicates better raw DX12 performance in certain scenarios. The Pro card’s 16 GB memory capacity, double that of the RX 9060, provides more headroom for memory-intensive tasks such as large texture packs or professional visualization workloads, despite lower bandwidth.

For users running a mix of modern games, productivity software, and compute tasks, the RX 9060 is the pragmatic pick. Its seven benchmark wins, including all legacy DirectX tests and OpenCL, cover a wider range of real-world usage. The fact that it achieves this with fewer shading units (1792 vs 2560) and less memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s vs 384.0 GB/s) demonstrates the efficiency gains of RDNA 4.0 over RDNA 1.0.

For users whose primary applications rely on Vulkan or specific DX12 paths, the Pro 5700 XT remains relevant despite being end-of-life. Its higher average benchmark score (18685 vs 16014) and higher percentile rank (63 vs 59) reflect its strong showing in those two tests. However, its lack of display outputs and IGP form factor limit its use to systems with integrated graphics support, whereas the RX 9060 is a standard dual-slot card with modern display outputs.

The final recommendation: choose the RX 9060 for general purpose gaming, compute, and modern API support. Choose the Pro 5700 XT only if Vulkan performance is the primary requirement and the 16 GB memory capacity outweighs the RX 9060’s broader benchmark dominance.